Aidence vs Deep Genomics
In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
🇳🇱 Netherlands · Jeroen Vendrig
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$20M
1-50 employees
🇨🇦 Canada · Brendan Frey
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$180M
100-500 employees
Analyst Summary
Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations
Both Aidence and Deep Genomics compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Aidence develops AI radiology software for lung cancer detection, building CE-marked and FDA-cleared deep learning algorithms that analyse CT scan images to identify and characterise pulmonary nodules requiring clinical follow-up. Deep Genomics applies deep learning to genetic medicine discovery, using AI models trained on genomic sequence data to predict the functional consequences of genetic variants, identify RNA splicing defects that underlie genetic diseases, and generate novel therapeutic candidates including antisense oligonucleotides and small molecules that correct disease-causing genetic variants.
Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation at this time. On the funding side, Deep Genomics has raised $180M in total — $160M more than Aidence's $20M.
Deep Genomics has 1 year more market experience, having been founded in 2015 compared to Aidence's 2016 founding. In terms of growth stage, Aidence is at Series B while Deep Genomics is at Series C — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.
Aidence operates out of 🇳🇱 Netherlands while Deep Genomics is based in 🇨🇦 Canada, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Deep Genomics leads with a score of 68, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Aidence | Deep Genomics |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | N/A |
📈Total Funding | $20M | $180MWINS |
📅Founded | 2016WINS | 2015 |
🚀Stage | Series B | Series C |
👥Employees | 1-50 | 100-500 |
🌍Country | Netherlands | Canada |
🏷️Category | AI Healthcare | AI Healthcare |
⭐Awaira Score | 45 | 68WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Deep Genomics has raised $160M more ($180M vs $20M)
Market experience: Deep Genomics has 1 year more (founded 2015 vs 2016)
Growth stage: Aidence is at Series B vs Deep Genomics at Series C
Team size: Aidence has 1-50 employees vs Deep Genomics's 100-500
Market base: 🇳🇱 Aidence (Netherlands) vs 🇨🇦 Deep Genomics (Canada)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment
Awaira Score: Deep Genomics scores 68/100 vs Aidence's 45/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Aidence if…
- ✓Netherlands-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Aidence develops AI radiology software for lung cancer detection, building CE-marked and FDA-cleared deep learning algorithms that analyse CT scan images to identify and characterise pulmonary nodules requiring clinical follow-up
Choose Deep Genomics if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 68/100 vs 45/100
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $180M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2015
- ✓Canada-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Deep Genomics applies deep learning to genetic medicine discovery, using AI models trained on genomic sequence data to predict the functional consequences of genetic variants, identify RNA splicing defects that underlie genetic diseases, and generate novel therapeutic candidates including antisense oligonucleotides and small molecules that correct disease-causing genetic variants