Overall Winner: Nabla·73/ 100
VS
N
NablaWinner

Aidence vs Nabla

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

A
Aidence

🇳🇱 Netherlands · Jeroen Vendrig

Series BAI HealthcareEst. 2016

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$20M

45
Awaira Score45/100

1-50 employees

Full Aidence Profile →
Winner
N
Nabla

🇫🇷 France · Alexandre Lebrun

Series BAI HealthcareEst. 2018

Valuation

$180M

Total Funding

$30M

73
Awaira Score73/100

80 employees

Full Nabla Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Aidence and Nabla compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Aidence develops AI radiology software for lung cancer detection, building CE-marked and FDA-cleared deep learning algorithms that analyse CT scan images to identify and characterise pulmonary nodules requiring clinical follow-up. Nabla is a French AI health company founded in 2018 that develops artificial intelligence solutions for clinical documentation and patient care workflows.

Nabla carries a known valuation of $180M, while Aidence's valuation has not been publicly disclosed. On the funding side, Nabla has raised $30M in total — $10M more than Aidence's $20M.

Aidence has 2 years more market experience, having been founded in 2016 compared to Nabla's 2018 founding. Both companies are currently at the Series B stage of their journey.

Aidence operates out of 🇳🇱 Netherlands while Nabla is based in 🇫🇷 France, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Nabla leads with a score of 73, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricAidenceNabla
💰Valuation
N/A
$180M
📈Total Funding
$20M
$30MWINS
📅Founded
2016
2018WINS
🚀Stage
Series B
Series B
👥Employees
1-50
80
🌍Country
Netherlands
France
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
45
73WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Nabla has raised $10M more ($30M vs $20M)

📅

Market experience: Aidence has 2 years more (founded 2016 vs 2018)

👥

Team size: Aidence has 1-50 employees vs Nabla's 80

🌍

Market base: 🇳🇱 Aidence (Netherlands) vs 🇫🇷 Nabla (France)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Awaira Score: Nabla scores 73/100 vs Aidence's 45/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

A

Choose Aidence if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2016
  • Netherlands-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Aidence develops AI radiology software for lung cancer detection, building CE-marked and FDA-cleared deep learning algorithms that analyse CT scan images to identify and characterise pulmonary nodules requiring clinical follow-up
N

Choose Nabla if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 73/100 vs 45/100
  • More established by valuation ($180M)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $30M
  • France-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Nabla is a French AI health company founded in 2018 that develops artificial intelligence solutions for clinical documentation and patient care workflows

Funding History

Aidence raised $20M across 0 rounds. Nabla raised $30M across 1 round.

Aidence

No public funding data available.

Nabla

Seed

Jan 2018

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Aidence vs Nabla

Is Aidence bigger than Nabla?
Nabla has a disclosed valuation of $180M, while Aidence's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Nabla employs 80 people.
Which company raised more funding — Aidence or Nabla?
Nabla has raised more in total funding at $30M, compared to Aidence's $20M — a gap of $10M. Combined, the two companies have completed 1 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Nabla holds the higher Awaira Score at 73/100, compared to Aidence's 45/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 28-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Aidence vs Nabla?
Aidence was founded by Jeroen Vendrig in 2016. Nabla was founded by Alexandre Lebrun in 2018. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Aidence do vs Nabla?
Aidence: Aidence develops AI radiology software for lung cancer detection, building CE-marked and FDA-cleared deep learning algorithms that analyse CT scan images to identify and characterise pulmonary nodules requiring clinical follow-up. The Amsterdam company tools assist radiologists in national lung cancer screening programmes and in routine clinical CT reading, providing AI-generated nodule measurements, growth tracking, and malignancy risk scores that reduce reader variability and improve early detection rates.\n\nThe company raised approximately $20 million in venture funding and has deployed its Veye Chest algorithm across multiple European radiology networks and hospital systems participating in national lung cancer screening initiatives. Aidence received CE marking for its software as a medical device and has published clinical validation studies demonstrating performance that is non-inferior to specialist radiologist reads on lung nodule detection tasks.\n\nAidence competes in the AI radiology market alongside Annalise AI, Enlitic, Behold.ai, and Lunit, all of which target chest X-ray and CT reading assistance. The lung cancer screening market has expanded significantly as multiple European countries and the United States have implemented or planned national screening programmes for high-risk smokers, creating a growing workflow automation opportunity for AI lung nodule detection tools. The company was acquired by Coreline Soft, a South Korean medical AI company, as part of a broader consolidation in the AI radiology market. Nabla: Nabla is a French AI health company founded in 2018 that develops artificial intelligence solutions for clinical documentation and patient care workflows. The company has raised $30M in total funding and operates at Series B stage with a valuation of $200M. Nabla's core offering focuses on AI-powered clinical documentation tools designed to reduce administrative burden on healthcare providers. The platform leverages natural language processing and machine learning to automate medical note-taking, allowing physicians to spend more time with patients rather than on paperwork. The company targets hospitals, clinics, and healthcare systems across Europe, with particular strength in the French market. Nabla's technology integrates with existing electronic health record systems and clinical workflows. The company competes in the growing digital health and healthcare AI sector alongside players focused on clinical automation and documentation efficiency. Nabla's approach emphasizes practical integration into existing healthcare infrastructure rather than building standalone applications. The company has demonstrated traction in European healthcare markets where administrative burden on clinicians remains significant. Its Series B funding stage indicates successful product-market fit validation and positions Nabla for expanded market reach and product development in the healthcare AI space. Nabla addresses the specific pain point of clinical documentation burden through AI automation, allowing European healthcare providers to improve operational efficiency.
Which company was founded first?
Aidence was founded first in 2016, giving it 2 years of additional market experience. Nabla was founded later in 2018. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Aidence has approximately 1-50 employees, while Nabla has approximately 80. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Aidence and Nabla competitors?
Yes, Aidence and Nabla are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Healthcare space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.