BioCatch vs Snyk
In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
🇮🇱 Israel · Avi Turgeman
Valuation
$1B
Total Funding
$213M
100-500 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Guy Podjarny
Valuation
$7.4B
Total Funding
$1.3B
2000 employees
Analyst Summary
Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations
Both BioCatch and Snyk compete directly in the AI Security space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. Snyk is a developer security platform founded in 2015 that specializes in identifying and fixing vulnerabilities in open-source dependencies, container images, and infrastructure-as-code.
Snyk carries a valuation of $7.4B, which is 7.4x higher than BioCatch's $1B. On the funding side, Snyk has raised $1.3B in total — $1.1B more than BioCatch's $213M.
BioCatch has 4 years more market experience, having been founded in 2011 compared to Snyk's 2015 founding. In terms of growth stage, BioCatch is at Series D while Snyk is at Series G — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.
BioCatch operates out of 🇮🇱 Israel while Snyk is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, both companies are closely matched — BioCatch scores 80 and Snyk scores 82.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | BioCatch | Snyk |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $1B | $7.4BWINS |
📈Total Funding | $213M | $1.3BWINS |
📅Founded | 2011 | 2015WINS |
🚀Stage | Series D | Series G |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 2000 |
🌍Country | Israel | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Security | AI Security |
⭐Awaira Score | 80 | 82WINS |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Snyk is valued 7.4x higher ($7.4B vs $1B)
Funding gap: Snyk has raised $1.1B more ($1.3B vs $213M)
Market experience: BioCatch has 4 years more (founded 2011 vs 2015)
Growth stage: BioCatch is at Series D vs Snyk at Series G
Team size: BioCatch has 100-500 employees vs Snyk's 2000
Market base: 🇮🇱 BioCatch (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 Snyk (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Security market segment
Awaira Score: Snyk scores 82/100 vs BioCatch's 80/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose BioCatch if…
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions
Choose Snyk if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 82/100 vs 80/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($7.4B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $1.3B
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Snyk is a developer security platform founded in 2015 that specializes in identifying and fixing vulnerabilities in open-source dependencies, container images, and infrastructure-as-code
Funding History
BioCatch raised $213M across 0 rounds. Snyk raised $1.3B across 8 rounds.
BioCatch
No public funding data available.
Snyk
Series G
Apr 2023
Lead: Stripes
Series F
Oct 2021
Lead: Generation Investment Management
Series E
Apr 2021
Lead: Salesforce Ventures
Series D
Apr 2020
Lead: Stripes
Series C
Sep 2018
Lead: Felicis Ventures
Series B
Sep 2017
Lead: Accel Partners
Series A
Jan 2016
Lead: CRV
Seed
Jan 2015
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Snyk