BioCatch vs Voyager Labs

BioCatch has a disclosed valuation of $1B, while Voyager Labs's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. BioCatch employs 100-500 people.

BioCatch has raised more in total funding at $213M, compared to Voyager Labs's $100M — a gap of $113M.

BioCatch holds the higher Awaira Score at 80/100, compared to Voyager Labs's 52/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 28-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.

BioCatch was founded by Avi Turgeman in 2011. Voyager Labs was founded by Avi Kirshenboim in 2012. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.

BioCatch: BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. The Tel Aviv company processes behavioural signals from hundreds of millions of user sessions monthly, building individual profiles that flag deviations indicating fraud.\n\nThe company raised approximately $213 million in venture funding including a Series D led by Tiger Global, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. BioCatch counts over 30 tier-one banks globally among its clients including American Express, NatWest, and Lloyds Banking Group, with deployments protecting online banking and mobile banking sessions from fraud that bypasses traditional authentication controls. The platform is particularly effective against malware-assisted fraud and social engineering scams where the genuine account holder is unknowingly manipulated.\n\nBioCatch competes in the behavioural biometrics and fraud intelligence market alongside ThreatMetrix (now LexisNexis Risk Solutions), Sift, and Sardine, as well as traditional fraud management platforms from FICO and SAS. Its differentiation is the depth of its behavioural feature engineering from passive interaction signals that do not require active user participation, creating a fraud layer that operates continuously without adding friction to legitimate user journeys. The growing prevalence of authorised push payment fraud and social engineering attacks in European banking has expanded the relevant use case for BioCatch beyond traditional account takeover detection. Voyager Labs: Voyager Labs builds AI investigation and intelligence software that aggregates and analyses open-source data from social media, news, and public records to support law enforcement, government intelligence agencies, and corporate security teams in conducting investigations and threat assessments. The Tel Aviv company platform applies natural language processing and social network analysis to large volumes of unstructured public data to identify patterns, connections, and entities relevant to security investigations.\n\nThe company raised approximately $100 million in venture funding from investors including Koch Disruptive Technologies and Viola Ventures. Voyager Labs has faced public scrutiny regarding deployments at the Los Angeles Police Department and other law enforcement agencies, with civil liberties organisations raising concerns about the scope of social media monitoring enabled by the platform. The company operates in the law enforcement intelligence technology market alongside Palantir, Babel Street, and Clearview AI.\n\nVoyager Labs operates in the contested market for AI-powered law enforcement and intelligence tools, a segment that has grown significantly as open-source intelligence capabilities have expanded with social media data volumes. The company faces ongoing regulatory and reputational challenges around the appropriate use of AI social media monitoring for law enforcement purposes, reflecting broader societal debates about surveillance technology. The intersection of capable AI investigation tools and civil liberties considerations creates a complex operating environment that distinguishes this market from commercial enterprise AI software procurement.

BioCatch was founded first in 2011, giving it 1 year of additional market experience. Voyager Labs was founded later in 2012. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.

Both BioCatch and Voyager Labs report similar employee counts of approximately 100-500. Team size is often a proxy for operational scale, though lean AI companies can punch well above their headcount.

Yes, BioCatch and Voyager Labs are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Security space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.