Classiq vs Neysa

Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation, making a definitive size comparison difficult. Classiq employs 1-50 people, while Neysa has 50-200 employees.

Classiq has raised more in total funding at $63M, compared to Neysa's $30M — a gap of $33M.

Neysa holds the higher Awaira Score at 55/100, compared to Classiq's 48/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 7-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.

Classiq was founded by Nir Minerbi in 2020. Neysa was founded by Shashank Samala in 2023. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.

Classiq: Classiq develops quantum computing software that automates the synthesis of quantum circuits from high-level algorithmic descriptions, allowing quantum algorithm developers to specify what computation should be performed without manually designing the low-level quantum gate sequences required to implement it. The Tel Aviv company platform generates optimised quantum circuits for specific hardware backends including IBM, Google, and IonQ quantum processors.\n\nThe company raised approximately $63 million in venture funding including a Series C from investors including HPE, NTT, and HSBC. Classiq targets financial services, pharmaceuticals, and logistics companies investigating quantum computing applications for optimisation, simulation, and machine learning, providing software tools that accelerate quantum algorithm development without requiring deep quantum physics expertise from application developers. The company has partnerships with IBM Quantum and NVIDIA cuQuantum for hybrid classical-quantum workflows.\n\nClassiq competes in the quantum software market alongside Qiskit (IBM), Cirq (Google), and commercial quantum software platforms including 1QBit and QC Ware. The company occupies the abstraction layer between algorithm description and hardware implementation, a segment that becomes increasingly valuable as quantum hardware matures and the bottleneck shifts from physical qubit availability to algorithm development productivity. The long timelines to commercial quantum advantage create both extended runway requirements and extended opportunity windows for quantum software infrastructure companies positioned ahead of hardware maturity. Neysa: Neysa builds cloud infrastructure purpose-built for AI workloads, offering GPU-accelerated compute, storage, and networking optimized for training and inference at scale. The platform targets enterprises and AI labs in India that need high-performance compute without the cost and complexity of hyperscaler lock-in.\n\nThe company raised approximately $30M in Series A funding and has attracted early adopters across the Indian AI startup ecosystem seeking affordable, low-latency GPU access. Neysa operates its own data centers with an emphasis on cost-per-token efficiency for large model training.\n\nAs Indian AI labs and enterprises scale their model development ambitions, Neysa sits at the center of a critical infrastructure gap. Domestic GPU cloud capacity is severely constrained relative to demand, and Neysa is one of the few India-headquartered players building the physical and software stack to address it.

Classiq was founded first in 2020, giving it 3 years of additional market experience. Neysa was founded later in 2023. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.

Classiq has approximately 1-50 employees, while Neysa has approximately 50-200. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.

Yes, Classiq and Neysa are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Infrastructure space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.