Overall Winner: Harrison.ai·68/ 100

Harrison.ai vs PathAI

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Winner
H
Harrison.ai

🇦🇺 Australia · Aengus Tran

Series CAI HealthcareEst. 2018

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$129M

68
Awaira Score68/100

100-500 employees

Full Harrison.ai Profile →
P
PathAI

🇺🇸 United States · Andy Beck

Series CAI HealthcareEst. 2016

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$255M

62
Awaira Score62/100

300 employees

Full PathAI Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Harrison.ai and PathAI compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Harrison. PathAI is an AI healthcare company founded in 2016 that develops digital pathology solutions and AI-powered diagnostic tools for pathology labs and healthcare institutions.

Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation at this time. On the funding side, PathAI has raised $255M in total — $126M more than Harrison.ai's $129M.

PathAI has 2 years more market experience, having been founded in 2016 compared to Harrison.ai's 2018 founding. Both companies are currently at the Series C stage of their journey.

Harrison.ai operates out of 🇦🇺 Australia while PathAI is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Harrison.ai leads with a score of 68, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricHarrison.aiPathAI
💰Valuation
N/A
N/A
📈Total Funding
$129M
$255MWINS
📅Founded
2018WINS
2016
🚀Stage
Series C
Series C
👥Employees
100-500
300
🌍Country
Australia
United States
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
68WINS
62

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: PathAI has raised $126M more ($255M vs $129M)

📅

Market experience: PathAI has 2 years more (founded 2016 vs 2018)

👥

Team size: Harrison.ai has 100-500 employees vs PathAI's 300

🌍

Market base: 🇦🇺 Harrison.ai (Australia) vs 🇺🇸 PathAI (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Awaira Score: Harrison.ai scores 68/100 vs PathAI's 62/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

H

Choose Harrison.ai if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 68/100 vs 62/100
  • Australia-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Harrison
P

Choose PathAI if…

  • Stronger investor backing — raised $255M
  • More market experience — founded in 2016
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • PathAI is an AI healthcare company founded in 2016 that develops digital pathology solutions and AI-powered diagnostic tools for pathology labs and healthcare institutions

Funding History

Harrison.ai raised $129M across 0 rounds. PathAI raised $255M across 3 rounds.

Harrison.ai

No public funding data available.

PathAI

Series C

Jan 2021

$165M

Series B

Jan 2019

$75M

Series A

Jan 2018

$15M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to PathAI

Khosla VenturesMayo Clinic

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Harrison.ai vs PathAI

Is Harrison.ai bigger than PathAI?
Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation, making a definitive size comparison difficult. Harrison.ai employs 100-500 people, while PathAI has 300 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Harrison.ai or PathAI?
PathAI has raised more in total funding at $255M, compared to Harrison.ai's $129M — a gap of $126M. Combined, the two companies have completed 3 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Harrison.ai holds the higher Awaira Score at 68/100, compared to PathAI's 62/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 6-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Harrison.ai vs PathAI?
Harrison.ai was founded by Aengus Tran in 2018. PathAI was founded by Andy Beck in 2016. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Harrison.ai do vs PathAI?
Harrison.ai: Harrison.ai develops AI radiology and pathology analysis software for clinical deployment, building FDA-cleared and TGA-registered algorithms for chest X-ray abnormality detection, CT pulmonary angiography analysis, and mammography screening under its Annalise.ai product brand. The Sydney company focuses on AI clinical decision support that helps radiologists prioritise worklists, detect abnormalities, and reduce reporting errors in high-volume radiology departments.\n\nThe company raised approximately $129 million including a Series C from investors including Blackbird Ventures, Skip Capital, and Telstra Ventures. Harrison.ai has deployed its Annalise.ai platform across Australian hospital networks and has received US FDA clearance for its chest X-ray AI product, enabling international commercial expansion beyond Australia. The company has published clinical validation studies demonstrating AI performance that is non-inferior to specialist radiologist reads on chest X-ray abnormality detection across multiple institutions.\n\nHarrison.ai competes in the AI radiology market against Aidoc, Lunit, Qure.ai, and Behold.ai, which all target radiologist workflow assistance and clinical alerting. The Australian healthcare market provides a strong home base given the National Health Service framework and centrally coordinated radiology procurement, while FDA clearance opens the substantially larger US radiology AI market. The company is considered one of Australia most promising medical AI companies and a flagship for the Australian healthcare technology ecosystem. PathAI: PathAI is an AI healthcare company founded in 2016 that develops digital pathology solutions and AI-powered diagnostic tools for pathology labs and healthcare institutions. The company specializes in machine learning algorithms designed to assist pathologists in analyzing tissue samples and identifying diseases, particularly cancer. PathAI's core technology platform leverages deep learning and computer vision to process histopathology images, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and workflow efficiency. The company's primary offering includes software that integrates with existing laboratory information systems, enabling pathologists to use AI-assisted analysis for specimen evaluation. PathAI has developed partnerships with major healthcare systems and diagnostic laboratories, demonstrating clinical utility in oncology and other pathology specialties. The platform addresses critical challenges in pathology including diagnostic consistency, workload management, and access to specialized expertise in underserved regions. PathAI has raised $255 million in total funding as of its Series C stage, with valuation not disclosed. The company operates in the competitive digital pathology and AI diagnostics space, alongside competitors offering similar computational pathology solutions. The digital pathology market is experiencing significant growth driven by increasing diagnostic demands, laboratory automation trends, and regulatory acceptance of AI-assisted tools. PathAI's trajectory reflects broader momentum in AI-enabled healthcare diagnostics and precision medicine applications. PathAI combines deep learning with pathology workflows to create clinically integrated AI tools that assist rather than replace human pathologists.
Which company was founded first?
PathAI was founded first in 2016, giving it 2 years of additional market experience. Harrison.ai was founded later in 2018. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Harrison.ai has approximately 100-500 employees, while PathAI has approximately 300. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Harrison.ai and PathAI competitors?
Yes, Harrison.ai and PathAI are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Healthcare space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.