Overall Winner: Hasura·70/ 100
H
HasuraWinner
VS

Hasura vs Qodo

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Winner
H
Hasura

🇮🇳 India · Tanmai Gopal

Series CAI Dev ToolsEst. 2017

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$100M

70
Awaira Score70/100

200-500 employees

Full Hasura Profile →
Q
Qodo

🇮🇱 Israel · Itamar Friedman

Series AAI Dev ToolsEst. 2022

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$50M

58
Awaira Score58/100

75 employees

Full Qodo Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Hasura and Qodo compete directly in the AI Dev Tools space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Hasura is an open-source platform that instantly generates GraphQL and REST APIs over databases, enabling developers to query, mutate, and subscribe to data changes without writing backend code, and has extended its platform to include AI-native API orchestration for connecting LLMs to enterprise data sources. Qodo is an Israeli AI development tools company founded in 2022 that focuses on code generation and quality assurance for software developers.

Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation at this time. On the funding side, Hasura has raised $100M in total — $50M more than Qodo's $50M.

Hasura has 5 years more market experience, having been founded in 2017 compared to Qodo's 2022 founding. In terms of growth stage, Hasura is at Series C while Qodo is at Series A — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Hasura operates out of 🇮🇳 India while Qodo is based in 🇮🇱 Israel, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Hasura leads with a score of 70, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricHasuraQodo
💰Valuation
N/A
N/A
📈Total Funding
$100MWINS
$50M
📅Founded
2017
2022WINS
🚀Stage
Series C
Series A
👥Employees
200-500
75
🌍Country
India
Israel
🏷️Category
AI Dev Tools
AI Dev Tools
Awaira Score
70WINS
58

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Hasura has raised $50M more ($100M vs $50M)

📅

Market experience: Hasura has 5 years more (founded 2017 vs 2022)

🚀

Growth stage: Hasura is at Series C vs Qodo at Series A

👥

Team size: Hasura has 200-500 employees vs Qodo's 75

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇳 Hasura (India) vs 🇮🇱 Qodo (Israel)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Dev Tools market segment

Awaira Score: Hasura scores 70/100 vs Qodo's 58/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

H

Choose Hasura if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 70/100 vs 58/100
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $100M
  • More market experience — founded in 2017
  • India-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Hasura is an open-source platform that instantly generates GraphQL and REST APIs over databases, enabling developers to query, mutate, and subscribe to data changes without writing backend code, and has extended its platform to include AI-native API orchestration for connecting LLMs to enterprise data sources
Q

Choose Qodo if…

  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Qodo is an Israeli AI development tools company founded in 2022 that focuses on code generation and quality assurance for software developers

Funding History

Hasura raised $100M across 0 rounds. Qodo raised $50M across 1 round.

Hasura

No public funding data available.

Qodo

Series A

Jan 2023

Lead: Khosla Ventures

$50M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Qodo

Khosla VenturesCopilot Collective

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Hasura vs Qodo

Is Hasura bigger than Qodo?
Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation, making a definitive size comparison difficult. Hasura employs 200-500 people, while Qodo has 75 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Hasura or Qodo?
Hasura has raised more in total funding at $100M, compared to Qodo's $50M — a gap of $50M. Combined, the two companies have completed 1 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Hasura holds the higher Awaira Score at 70/100, compared to Qodo's 58/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 12-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Hasura vs Qodo?
Hasura was founded by Tanmai Gopal in 2017. Qodo was founded by Itamar Friedman in 2022. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Hasura do vs Qodo?
Hasura: Hasura is an open-source platform that instantly generates GraphQL and REST APIs over databases, enabling developers to query, mutate, and subscribe to data changes without writing backend code, and has extended its platform to include AI-native API orchestration for connecting LLMs to enterprise data sources. The platform auto-generates a complete typed API layer from database schemas and supports authorization rules, remote joins, and event triggers for building real-time data-driven applications.\n\nThe company raised approximately $100M from investors including Lightspeed Venture Partners and Nexus Venture Partners, and has built a large open-source community of over 30,000 GitHub stars with enterprise customers spanning financial services, media, and technology companies. Hasura's data delivery network, Hasura DDN, extends the platform to distributed data architectures for large-scale enterprise deployments.\n\nAs AI applications require real-time, structured access to enterprise data, Hasura's API generation capabilities have found new relevance as the data connectivity layer for LLM-powered applications. The company's open-source distribution model has created strong developer adoption that translates into enterprise sales at a scale that would be difficult to achieve through outbound sales alone. Qodo: Qodo is an Israeli AI development tools company founded in 2022 that focuses on code generation and quality assurance for software developers. The company has raised $50M in total funding and operates at Series A stage, with valuation not disclosed. Qodo develops AI-powered tools designed to automate code generation, testing, and documentation tasks within the software development lifecycle. The platform leverages machine learning to analyze codebases and generate relevant test cases, reducing manual testing overhead and improving code coverage. The company positions itself within the broader AI developer tools category, competing alongside platforms offering code completion and automated testing solutions. Qodo's technology approach emphasizes understanding existing code patterns to generate contextually appropriate outputs. The company targets software development teams and enterprises seeking to accelerate development cycles while maintaining code quality standards. Its tools integrate into existing development environments to minimize friction in adoption. The Israeli tech ecosystem provides Qodo with access to engineering talent and venture capital networks. The company's Series A funding stage indicates investor confidence in its market opportunity within the expanding AI-assisted development tools sector. Growth trajectory reflects increasing enterprise demand for AI solutions that address developer productivity and code quality challenges. Qodo automates test generation and code quality assurance specifically for developers, addressing testing bottlenecks in software development pipelines.
Which company was founded first?
Hasura was founded first in 2017, giving it 5 years of additional market experience. Qodo was founded later in 2022. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Hasura has approximately 200-500 employees, while Qodo has approximately 75. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Hasura and Qodo competitors?
Yes, Hasura and Qodo are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Dev Tools space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.