Overall Winner: Paige AI·65/ 100

Kepler Vision vs Paige AI

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

K
Kepler Vision

🇳🇱 Netherlands · Harro Stokman

SeedAI HealthcareEst. 2017

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

N/A

30
Awaira Score30/100

1-50 employees

Full Kepler Vision Profile →
Winner
P
Paige AI

🇺🇸 United States · Leo Grady

Series CAI HealthcareEst. 2018

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$125M

65
Awaira Score65/100

100-500 employees

Full Paige AI Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Kepler Vision and Paige AI compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Kepler Vision Technologies develops AI fall detection and activity recognition software for elderly care environments, using computer vision models that process video from ceiling-mounted cameras in care facilities to detect falls, assess resident activity patterns, and alert care staff to incidents requiring immediate response. Paige AI develops AI-powered pathology software that assists pathologists in identifying cancer and other diseases in digital whole-slide images.

Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation at this time. Paige AI has raised $125M in disclosed funding.

Kepler Vision has 1 year more market experience, having been founded in 2017 compared to Paige AI's 2018 founding. In terms of growth stage, Kepler Vision is at Seed while Paige AI is at Series C — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Kepler Vision operates out of 🇳🇱 Netherlands while Paige AI is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Paige AI leads with a score of 65, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricKepler VisionPaige AI
💰Valuation
N/A
N/A
📈Total Funding
N/A
$125M
📅Founded
2017
2018WINS
🚀Stage
Seed
Series C
👥Employees
1-50
100-500
🌍Country
Netherlands
United States
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
30
65WINS

Key Differences

📅

Market experience: Kepler Vision has 1 year more (founded 2017 vs 2018)

🚀

Growth stage: Kepler Vision is at Seed vs Paige AI at Series C

👥

Team size: Kepler Vision has 1-50 employees vs Paige AI's 100-500

🌍

Market base: 🇳🇱 Kepler Vision (Netherlands) vs 🇺🇸 Paige AI (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Awaira Score: Paige AI scores 65/100 vs Kepler Vision's 30/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

K

Choose Kepler Vision if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2017
  • Netherlands-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Kepler Vision Technologies develops AI fall detection and activity recognition software for elderly care environments, using computer vision models that process video from ceiling-mounted cameras in care facilities to detect falls, assess resident activity patterns, and alert care staff to incidents requiring immediate response
P

Choose Paige AI if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 65/100 vs 30/100
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $125M
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Paige AI develops AI-powered pathology software that assists pathologists in identifying cancer and other diseases in digital whole-slide images

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Kepler Vision vs Paige AI

Is Kepler Vision bigger than Paige AI?
Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation, making a definitive size comparison difficult. Kepler Vision employs 1-50 people, while Paige AI has 100-500 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Kepler Vision or Paige AI?
Paige AI has raised $125M in disclosed funding across 0 known rounds. Kepler Vision's funding history is not publicly available.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Paige AI holds the higher Awaira Score at 65/100, compared to Kepler Vision's 30/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 35-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Kepler Vision vs Paige AI?
Kepler Vision was founded by Harro Stokman in 2017. Paige AI was founded by Leo Grady in 2018. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Kepler Vision do vs Paige AI?
Kepler Vision: Kepler Vision Technologies develops AI fall detection and activity recognition software for elderly care environments, using computer vision models that process video from ceiling-mounted cameras in care facilities to detect falls, assess resident activity patterns, and alert care staff to incidents requiring immediate response. The Amsterdam company platform is designed to operate without wearables or pressure sensors, relying entirely on camera-based analysis to provide unobtrusive monitoring.\n\nThe company is early stage with initial funding from Dutch innovation programmes and care sector partners. Kepler Vision has piloted its Night Nurse product in Dutch residential care facilities, where staff shortages create demand for AI monitoring tools that can maintain safety oversight overnight when staffing ratios are lowest. The platform is designed to comply with European privacy regulations governing personal data processing in care environments, using on-device processing to avoid transmitting identifiable video to cloud services.\n\nKepler Vision operates in the AI elder care market alongside CarePredict, SafelyYou, and camera-based monitoring startups targeting the intersection of computer vision and residential care. The European elder care AI market faces distinct regulatory challenges compared to the US, with GDPR-compliant video monitoring in care facilities requiring explicit consent frameworks and data minimisation approaches. The Netherlands position as a leader in healthcare technology innovation and its advanced residential care infrastructure make it a relevant test market for technology that addresses the growing caregiver shortage across European social care systems. Paige AI: Paige AI develops AI-powered pathology software that assists pathologists in identifying cancer and other diseases in digital whole-slide images. The platform received the first-ever FDA authorization for an AI-based primary diagnostic tool in pathology, a milestone that establishes regulatory precedent for clinical AI deployment in histopathology workflows.\n\nThe company raised approximately 125 million USD and partners with major academic medical centers and pathology laboratories to integrate its diagnostic AI into clinical workflows. Paige has expanded beyond prostate cancer detection into additional cancer types and is building a multi-cancer detection platform intended to function as a comprehensive AI layer across pathology departments.\n\nDigital pathology combined with AI represents one of the clearest near-term commercialization opportunities in medical AI, as the transition from glass slides to whole-slide imaging creates a digital substrate that AI can operate on at scale. Paige FDA clearance creates a significant regulatory moat that competitors must match before selling comparable diagnostic tools in the US market, giving the company a durable first-mover advantage in the AI-augmented pathology workflow.
Which company was founded first?
Kepler Vision was founded first in 2017, giving it 1 year of additional market experience. Paige AI was founded later in 2018. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Kepler Vision has approximately 1-50 employees, while Paige AI has approximately 100-500. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Kepler Vision and Paige AI competitors?
Yes, Kepler Vision and Paige AI are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Healthcare space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.