Overall Winner: Glean·82/ 100
VS
G
GleanWinner

6sense vs Glean

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

6
6sense

🇺🇸 United States · Amanda Kahlow

Series EEnterprise AIEst. 2013

Valuation

$5.2B

Total Funding

$426M

80
Awaira Score80/100

1500 employees

Full 6sense Profile →
Winner
G
Glean

🇺🇸 United States · Arvind Jain

Series EEnterprise AIEst. 2019

Valuation

$4.6B

Total Funding

$600M

82
Awaira Score82/100

500 employees

Full Glean Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both 6sense and Glean compete directly in the Enterprise AI space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. 6sense is an enterprise artificial intelligence platform that uses predictive analytics and machine learning to identify and engage high-value sales opportunities. Glean is an enterprise AI search and discovery platform founded in 2019 that helps organizations extract actionable insights from internal data.

6sense ($5.2B) is valued slightly higher than Glean ($4.6B). On the funding side, Glean has raised $600M in total — $174M more than 6sense's $426M.

6sense has 6 years more market experience, having been founded in 2013 compared to Glean's 2019 founding. Both companies are currently at the Series E stage of their journey.

Both companies are headquartered in 🇺🇸 United States, competing for the same regional talent and customer base. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, both companies are closely matched — 6sense scores 80 and Glean scores 82.

Metrics Comparison

Metric6senseGlean
💰Valuation
$5.2BWINS
$4.6B
📈Total Funding
$426M
$600MWINS
📅Founded
2013
2019WINS
🚀Stage
Series E
Series E
👥Employees
1500
500
🌍Country
United States
United States
🏷️Category
Enterprise AI
Enterprise AI
Awaira Score
80
82WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: 6sense is valued 1.1x higher ($5.2B vs $4.6B)

📈

Funding gap: Glean has raised $174M more ($600M vs $426M)

📅

Market experience: 6sense has 6 years more (founded 2013 vs 2019)

👥

Team size: 6sense has 1500 employees vs Glean's 500

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the Enterprise AI market segment

Awaira Score: Glean scores 82/100 vs 6sense's 80/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

6

Choose 6sense if…

  • More established by valuation ($5.2B)
  • More market experience — founded in 2013
  • 6sense is an enterprise artificial intelligence platform that uses predictive analytics and machine learning to identify and engage high-value sales opportunities
G

Choose Glean if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 82/100 vs 80/100
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $600M
  • Glean is an enterprise AI search and discovery platform founded in 2019 that helps organizations extract actionable insights from internal data

Funding History

6sense raised $426M across 5 rounds. Glean raised $600M across 5 rounds.

6sense

Series E

Jan 2021

$120M

Series D

Jan 2020

$100M

Series C

Jan 2018

$50M

Series B

Jan 2016

$20M

Series A

Jan 2014

$10M

Glean

Series E

Jan 2024

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$230M

Series D

Jan 2023

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$200M

Series C

Jan 2022

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$100M

Series B

Jan 2021

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$40M

Series A

Jan 2020

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$30M

Investor Comparison

Shared Investors1
Salesforce Ventures

Unique to Glean

Sequoia CapitalKleiner Perkins

Users Also Compare

FAQ — 6sense vs Glean

Is 6sense bigger than Glean?
By valuation, 6sense is the larger company at $5.2B versus $4.6B — a 1.1x difference. Size can also be measured by team: 6sense employs 1500 people while Glean has 500 employees.
Which company raised more funding — 6sense or Glean?
Glean has raised more in total funding at $600M, compared to 6sense's $426M — a gap of $174M. Combined, the two companies have completed 10 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Glean holds the higher Awaira Score at 82/100, compared to 6sense's 80/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 2-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded 6sense vs Glean?
6sense was founded by Amanda Kahlow in 2013. Glean was founded by Arvind Jain in 2019. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does 6sense do vs Glean?
6sense: 6sense is an enterprise artificial intelligence platform that uses predictive analytics and machine learning to identify and engage high-value sales opportunities. Founded in 2013, the company develops software that analyzes buyer behavior data, intent signals, and firmographic information to help B2B sales and marketing teams prioritize prospects and optimize revenue generation. The platform integrates with existing CRM systems and sales infrastructure to deliver insights about anonymous web visitors and purchasing intent before companies enter formal buying processes. 6sense operates in the competitive revenue intelligence and account-based marketing space, alongside competitors like Demandbase and ZoomInfo. The company utilizes first-party data collection, third-party data partnerships, and proprietary machine learning models to power its core functionality. Its customer base spans mid-market to enterprise organizations across technology, financial services, and other B2B sectors. With a valuation of $5.2 billion and $426 million in total funding as of its Series E stage, 6sense has achieved significant growth since inception. The company positions itself at the intersection of sales acceleration, marketing automation, and artificial intelligence, addressing the challenge of identifying qualified prospects in complex B2B buying cycles where multiple stakeholders influence purchasing decisions. 6sense combines anonymous web visitor tracking with AI-driven intent detection to help enterprise sales teams identify buying signals before traditional sales engagement. Glean: Glean is an enterprise AI search and discovery platform founded in 2019 that helps organizations extract actionable insights from internal data. The company operates in the enterprise AI category, providing AI-powered search capabilities across fragmented corporate information systems including documents, emails, chat messages, and databases. Glean's core technology uses machine learning to understand context and intent, enabling employees to find relevant information and answers across previously disconnected data sources. The platform serves large enterprises seeking to improve productivity and knowledge accessibility. Glean competes in the growing enterprise search and generative AI market alongside companies like Perplexity and traditional search providers adapting to AI. The company has raised $600 million across multiple funding rounds, reaching a valuation of $4.6 billion as of its Series E stage. This funding positions Glean among well-capitalized AI startups addressing enterprise information retrieval challenges. The company targets mid-to-large organizations where data silos and information discovery present operational inefficiencies. Glean's growth trajectory reflects broader enterprise adoption of AI-powered search solutions as organizations increasingly prioritize knowledge worker productivity and unified information access across their technology stacks. Glean specializes in enterprise-specific AI search that unifies fragmented internal data sources rather than external web indexing.
Which company was founded first?
6sense was founded first in 2013, giving it 6 years of additional market experience. Glean was founded later in 2019. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
6sense has approximately 1500 employees, while Glean has approximately 500. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are 6sense and Glean competitors?
Yes, 6sense and Glean are direct competitors — both operate in the Enterprise AI space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.