Overall Winner: Alan·83/ 100
A
AlanWinner
VS

Alan vs Harrison.ai

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Winner
A
Alan

🇫🇷 France · Jean-Charles Samuelian

Series DAI HealthcareEst. 2016

Valuation

$1.4B

Total Funding

$220M

83
Awaira Score83/100

500-1000 employees

Full Alan Profile →
H
Harrison.ai

🇦🇺 Australia · Aengus Tran

Series CAI HealthcareEst. 2018

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$129M

68
Awaira Score68/100

100-500 employees

Full Harrison.ai Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Alan and Harrison.ai compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Alan is an AI-powered health insurance platform that combines employer group health insurance products with a digital health companion application, using AI to personalise member health recommendations, streamline claims processing, and provide on-demand access to telehealth and mental health resources. Harrison.

Alan carries a known valuation of $1.4B, while Harrison.ai's valuation has not been publicly disclosed. On the funding side, Alan has raised $220M in total — $91M more than Harrison.ai's $129M.

Alan has 2 years more market experience, having been founded in 2016 compared to Harrison.ai's 2018 founding. In terms of growth stage, Alan is at Series D while Harrison.ai is at Series C — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Alan operates out of 🇫🇷 France while Harrison.ai is based in 🇦🇺 Australia, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Alan leads with a score of 83, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricAlanHarrison.ai
💰Valuation
$1.4B
N/A
📈Total Funding
$220MWINS
$129M
📅Founded
2016
2018WINS
🚀Stage
Series D
Series C
👥Employees
500-1000
100-500
🌍Country
France
Australia
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
83WINS
68

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Alan has raised $91M more ($220M vs $129M)

📅

Market experience: Alan has 2 years more (founded 2016 vs 2018)

🚀

Growth stage: Alan is at Series D vs Harrison.ai at Series C

👥

Team size: Alan has 500-1000 employees vs Harrison.ai's 100-500

🌍

Market base: 🇫🇷 Alan (France) vs 🇦🇺 Harrison.ai (Australia)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Awaira Score: Alan scores 83/100 vs Harrison.ai's 68/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

A

Choose Alan if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 83/100 vs 68/100
  • More established by valuation ($1.4B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $220M
  • More market experience — founded in 2016
  • France-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Alan is an AI-powered health insurance platform that combines employer group health insurance products with a digital health companion application, using AI to personalise member health recommendations, streamline claims processing, and provide on-demand access to telehealth and mental health resources
H

Choose Harrison.ai if…

  • Australia-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Harrison

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Alan vs Harrison.ai

Is Alan bigger than Harrison.ai?
Alan has a disclosed valuation of $1.4B, while Harrison.ai's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Alan employs 500-1000 people.
Which company raised more funding — Alan or Harrison.ai?
Alan has raised more in total funding at $220M, compared to Harrison.ai's $129M — a gap of $91M.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Alan holds the higher Awaira Score at 83/100, compared to Harrison.ai's 68/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 15-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Alan vs Harrison.ai?
Alan was founded by Jean-Charles Samuelian in 2016. Harrison.ai was founded by Aengus Tran in 2018. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Alan do vs Harrison.ai?
Alan: Alan is an AI-powered health insurance platform that combines employer group health insurance products with a digital health companion application, using AI to personalise member health recommendations, streamline claims processing, and provide on-demand access to telehealth and mental health resources. The Paris company holds full insurance carrier status in France, Belgium, and Spain, operating as a licensed insurer rather than a distribution intermediary.\n\nThe company raised approximately $220 million including a Series D round from investors including Temasek, Coatue, and Index Ventures, reaching a valuation of approximately $1.4 billion. Alan reports over half a million members across its markets, covering employees at several thousand companies including Stripe, Spendesk, and Vinted, with strong growth in SME employer sales driven by its digital-first enrolment and claims experience. The Alan app provides members with health navigation, symptom checking, and AI-generated health content in addition to insurance card and claims management functionality.\n\nAlan competes in the European digital health insurance market against traditional mutuals including Malakoff Humanis and AG2R La Mondiale, as well as digital health insurers including Henner and Oscar Health in the US context. Its vertical integration as a licensed insurer combined with a technology platform differentiates it from insurtechs that distribute existing insurer products through digital channels, giving Alan full control over the member experience and claims economics. The company is considered one of the most significant French technology companies building in regulated financial services. Harrison.ai: Harrison.ai develops AI radiology and pathology analysis software for clinical deployment, building FDA-cleared and TGA-registered algorithms for chest X-ray abnormality detection, CT pulmonary angiography analysis, and mammography screening under its Annalise.ai product brand. The Sydney company focuses on AI clinical decision support that helps radiologists prioritise worklists, detect abnormalities, and reduce reporting errors in high-volume radiology departments.\n\nThe company raised approximately $129 million including a Series C from investors including Blackbird Ventures, Skip Capital, and Telstra Ventures. Harrison.ai has deployed its Annalise.ai platform across Australian hospital networks and has received US FDA clearance for its chest X-ray AI product, enabling international commercial expansion beyond Australia. The company has published clinical validation studies demonstrating AI performance that is non-inferior to specialist radiologist reads on chest X-ray abnormality detection across multiple institutions.\n\nHarrison.ai competes in the AI radiology market against Aidoc, Lunit, Qure.ai, and Behold.ai, which all target radiologist workflow assistance and clinical alerting. The Australian healthcare market provides a strong home base given the National Health Service framework and centrally coordinated radiology procurement, while FDA clearance opens the substantially larger US radiology AI market. The company is considered one of Australia most promising medical AI companies and a flagship for the Australian healthcare technology ecosystem.
Which company was founded first?
Alan was founded first in 2016, giving it 2 years of additional market experience. Harrison.ai was founded later in 2018. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Alan has approximately 500-1000 employees, while Harrison.ai has approximately 100-500. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Alan and Harrison.ai competitors?
Yes, Alan and Harrison.ai are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Healthcare space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.