Overall Winner: Nabla·73/ 100
N
NablaWinner
VS

Nabla vs Insitro

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Winner
N
Nabla

🇫🇷 France · Alexandre Lebrun

Series BAI HealthcareEst. 2018

Valuation

$180M

Total Funding

$30M

73
Awaira Score73/100

80 employees

Full Nabla Profile →
I
Insitro

🇺🇸 United States · Daphne Koller

Series CAI HealthcareEst. 2018

Valuation

$2.2B

Total Funding

$743M

73
Awaira Score73/100

300 employees

Full Insitro Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Nabla and Insitro compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Nabla is a French AI health company founded in 2018 that develops artificial intelligence solutions for clinical documentation and patient care workflows. Insitro is an AI-driven drug discovery company founded in 2018 that applies machine learning to accelerate pharmaceutical development.

Insitro carries a valuation of $2.2B, which is 12.2x higher than Nabla's $180M. On the funding side, Insitro has raised $743M in total — $713M more than Nabla's $30M.

Both companies were founded in 2018, giving them the same market tenure. In terms of growth stage, Nabla is at Series B while Insitro is at Series C — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Nabla operates out of 🇫🇷 France while Insitro is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, both companies are closely matched — Nabla scores 73 and Insitro scores 73.

Metrics Comparison

MetricNablaInsitro
💰Valuation
$180M
$2.2BWINS
📈Total Funding
$30M
$743MWINS
📅Founded
2018
2018
🚀Stage
Series B
Series C
👥Employees
80
300
🌍Country
France
United States
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
73
73

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Insitro is valued 12.2x higher ($2.2B vs $180M)

📈

Funding gap: Insitro has raised $713M more ($743M vs $30M)

🚀

Growth stage: Nabla is at Series B vs Insitro at Series C

👥

Team size: Nabla has 80 employees vs Insitro's 300

🌍

Market base: 🇫🇷 Nabla (France) vs 🇺🇸 Insitro (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

N

Choose Nabla if…

Top Pick
  • France-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Nabla is a French AI health company founded in 2018 that develops artificial intelligence solutions for clinical documentation and patient care workflows
I

Choose Insitro if…

  • More established by valuation ($2.2B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $743M
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Insitro is an AI-driven drug discovery company founded in 2018 that applies machine learning to accelerate pharmaceutical development

Funding History

Nabla raised $30M across 1 round. Insitro raised $743M across 3 rounds.

Nabla

Seed

Jan 2018

Insitro

Series C

Oct 2021

Lead: Andreessen Horowitz

$200M

Series B

Jan 2020

Lead: Andreessen Horowitz

$60M

Series A

Jan 2019

Lead: Andreessen Horowitz

$30M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Insitro

Andreessen HorowitzCasdin PartnersBoehringer IngelheimSalesforce Ventures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Nabla vs Insitro

Is Nabla bigger than Insitro?
By valuation, Insitro is the larger company at $2.2B versus $180M — a 12.2x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Nabla employs 80 people while Insitro has 300 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Nabla or Insitro?
Insitro has raised more in total funding at $743M, compared to Nabla's $30M — a gap of $713M. Combined, the two companies have completed 4 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Both Nabla and Insitro share the same Awaira Score of 73/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric that factors in valuation, total funding raised, company stage, employee count, and market category.
Who founded Nabla vs Insitro?
Nabla was founded by Alexandre Lebrun in 2018. Insitro was founded by Daphne Koller in 2018. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Nabla do vs Insitro?
Nabla: Nabla is a French AI health company founded in 2018 that develops artificial intelligence solutions for clinical documentation and patient care workflows. The company has raised $30M in total funding and operates at Series B stage with a valuation of $200M. Nabla's core offering focuses on AI-powered clinical documentation tools designed to reduce administrative burden on healthcare providers. The platform leverages natural language processing and machine learning to automate medical note-taking, allowing physicians to spend more time with patients rather than on paperwork. The company targets hospitals, clinics, and healthcare systems across Europe, with particular strength in the French market. Nabla's technology integrates with existing electronic health record systems and clinical workflows. The company competes in the growing digital health and healthcare AI sector alongside players focused on clinical automation and documentation efficiency. Nabla's approach emphasizes practical integration into existing healthcare infrastructure rather than building standalone applications. The company has demonstrated traction in European healthcare markets where administrative burden on clinicians remains significant. Its Series B funding stage indicates successful product-market fit validation and positions Nabla for expanded market reach and product development in the healthcare AI space. Nabla addresses the specific pain point of clinical documentation burden through AI automation, allowing European healthcare providers to improve operational efficiency. Insitro: Insitro is an AI-driven drug discovery company founded in 2018 that applies machine learning to accelerate pharmaceutical development. The company combines computational biology, artificial intelligence, and wet-lab experimentation to identify and validate drug targets more efficiently than traditional methods. Insitro's platform uses proprietary algorithms to analyze complex biological data, predict drug efficacy and safety profiles, and optimize candidate selection across therapeutic areas including metabolic disease, oncology, and immunology. The company has raised $743 million across multiple funding rounds, achieving a valuation of $2.2 billion as of its Series C stage. This positions Insitro among well-capitalized AI healthcare startups addressing the structural inefficiencies in drug discovery. The company partners with pharmaceutical institutions to apply its technology to their pipelines, leveraging both internal discovery programs and collaborations. Insitro's competitive approach differs from pure software platforms by integrating experimental validation, reducing the translation gap between computational predictions and real-world drug performance. The company operates in a crowded but expanding market of AI drug discovery platforms competing against both established pharma AI initiatives and other venture-backed startups. Its growth trajectory reflects investor confidence in AI-enabled drug discovery models, though clinical validation remains ongoing for internally developed candidates. Insitro uniquely combines machine learning with integrated wet-lab capabilities rather than operating as pure software, bridging computational predictions to experimental validation.
Which company was founded first?
Both Nabla and Insitro were founded in the same year — 2018. Despite sharing a founding year, they may have launched at different times within that year, which can matter in fast-moving AI markets.
Which company has more employees?
Nabla has approximately 80 employees, while Insitro has approximately 300. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Nabla and Insitro competitors?
Yes, Nabla and Insitro are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Healthcare space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.