Bureau vs Onfido

Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation, making a definitive size comparison difficult. Bureau employs 50-200 people, while Onfido has 500-1000 employees.

Onfido has raised more in total funding at $200M, compared to Bureau's $17.5M — a gap of $182.5M.

Onfido holds the higher Awaira Score at 68/100, compared to Bureau's 58/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 10-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.

Bureau was founded by Ranjan R in 2020. Onfido was founded by Husayn Kassai in 2012. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.

Bureau: Bureau is an identity intelligence and fraud prevention platform that uses AI to aggregate and analyze device signals, behavioral biometrics, network metadata, and identity attributes to assess fraud risk and make real-time allow/block decisions for financial transactions, account creation, and login events. The platform offers risk APIs that integrate into payment, lending, and neobank workflows without adding friction for legitimate users.\n\nThe company raised approximately $17.5M in Series A funding from investors including Quona Capital and Village Global, and serves fintech companies, digital lenders, and payment processors in India and Southeast Asia. Bureau's consortium model shares fraud signals across its network of customers, creating a data network effect where each new integration improves fraud detection accuracy for all participants.\n\nOnline fraud losses in India have grown substantially alongside the digital payments boom, creating strong commercial incentives for effective fraud prevention infrastructure. Bureau's AI-native fraud intelligence approach, combined with its consortium data model, positions it as a serious alternative to rule-based fraud systems that cannot adapt to evolving fraud patterns at scale. Onfido: Onfido provided AI-powered identity verification services, using computer vision and machine learning to authenticate government-issued documents and biometric selfies for remote customer onboarding. The platform enabled banks, fintech companies, and regulated service providers to comply with Know Your Customer requirements without requiring in-person identity checks, processing identity verifications across more than 195 countries and supporting hundreds of document types.\n\nFounded in London in 2012, Onfido raised approximately $200 million from investors including SoftBank, TPG Growth, and Salesforce Ventures before being acquired by Entrust, the identity security company, in 2024 for approximately $400 million. At the time of acquisition, Onfido was processing hundreds of millions of identity checks annually for clients including HSBC, Revolut, and Bitstamp, making it one of the largest independent identity verification providers in the world.\n\nOnfido competed in the KYC and identity verification market alongside Jumio, Mitek, and AU10TIX, as well as large platform players including Experian and LexisNexis. The acquisition by Entrust gave Onfido access to a broader portfolio of physical and digital identity credentials and an enterprise sales channel with reach across government, banking, and enterprise security. The combined entity positions Entrust as a full-stack identity provider spanning physical documents, digital certificates, and AI-powered biometric verification.

Onfido was founded first in 2012, giving it 8 years of additional market experience. Bureau was founded later in 2020. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.

Bureau has approximately 50-200 employees, while Onfido has approximately 500-1000. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.

Yes, Bureau and Onfido are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Security space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.