Skip to main content

Snyk vs BioCatch

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Snyk is valued at $7.4B — more than 3x BioCatch's $1.3B.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Snyk leads on 4 of 5 metrics

Snyk

4 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
-Experience

BioCatch

1 win

-Valuation
-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$7.4B
$1.3B
Total Funding
$1.3B
$213M
Awaira Score
82/100
80/100
Employees
2000
100-500
Founded
2015
2011
Stage
Series G
Series D
SnykBioCatch
Winner
Snyk logo
Snyk

🇺🇸 United States · Guy Podjarny

Series GAI SecurityEst. 2015

Valuation

$7.4B

Total Funding

$1.3B

Awaira Score82/100

2000 employees

Full Snyk Profile →
BioCatch logo
BioCatch

🇮🇱 Israel · Avi Turgeman

Series DAI SecurityEst. 2011

Valuation

$1.3B

Total Funding

$213M

Awaira Score80/100

100-500 employees

Full BioCatch Profile →
Market Context

As AI Security players, Snyk and BioCatch target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Snyk at Series G vs BioCatch at Series D — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

The AI Security sector features both Snyk and BioCatch as key players. Snyk is a developer security platform founded in 2015 that specializes in identifying and fixing vulnerabilities in open-source dependencies, container images, and infrastructure-as-code. BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions.

Funding & Valuation

At $7.4B, Snyk's valuation dwarfs BioCatch's $1.3B by a factor of 5.7. Capital raised tells a clear story: Snyk at $1.3B versus BioCatch at $213M — a $1.1B difference.

Growth Stage

Established in 2011, BioCatch has a modest 4-year head start over Snyk (2015). Stage-wise, Snyk is classified as Series G and BioCatch as Series D, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. On headcount, Snyk reports 2000 employees and BioCatch reports 100-500.

Geography & Outlook

Based in 🇺🇸 United States and 🇮🇱 Israel respectively, Snyk and BioCatch tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. The Awaira Score reflects a tight race: 82 for Snyk versus 80 for BioCatch. Snyk, led by Guy Podjarny, and BioCatch, led by Avi Turgeman, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

Snyk

Total Rounds8
Avg. Round Size$164.7M
Funding Span8.2 yrs

BioCatch

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$40M

Funding History

Snyk has completed 8 funding rounds, while BioCatch has gone through 1. Snyk's most recent round was a Series G of $600M, compared to BioCatch's Series C ($40M). Snyk is at Series G while BioCatch is at Series D — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Snyk is significantly larger with about 2000 employees, compared to BioCatch's 100-500. That's a 20x difference in headcount. BioCatch has a 4-year head start, founded in 2011 vs Snyk's 2015. Geographically, they're in different markets — Snyk operates out of United States and BioCatch from Israel.

Metrics Comparison

MetricSnykBioCatch
💰Valuation
$7.4BWINS
$1.3B
📈Total Funding
$1.3BWINS
$213M
📅Founded
2015WINS
2011
🚀Stage
Series G
Series D
👥Employees
2000
100-500
🌍Country
United States
Israel
🏷️Category
AI Security
AI Security
Awaira Score
82WINS
80

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Snyk is valued 5.7x higher ($7.4B vs $1.3B)

📈

Funding gap: Snyk has raised $1.1B more ($1.3B vs $213M)

📅

Market experience: BioCatch has 4 years more (founded 2011 vs 2015)

🚀

Growth stage: Snyk is at Series G vs BioCatch at Series D

👥

Team size: Snyk has 2000 employees vs BioCatch's 100-500

🌍

Market base: 🇺🇸 Snyk (United States) vs 🇮🇱 BioCatch (Israel)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Security market segment

Awaira Score: Snyk scores 82/100 vs BioCatch's 80/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Snyk logo

Choose Snyk if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 82/100 vs 80/100
  • More established by valuation ($7.4B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $1.3B
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Snyk is a developer security platform founded in 2015 that specializes in identifying and fixing vulnerabilities in open-source dependencies, container images, and infrastructure-as-code
BioCatch logo

Choose BioCatch if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions

Funding History

Snyk raised $1.3B across 8 rounds. BioCatch raised $213M across 1 round.

Snyk

Series G

Apr 2023

Lead: Stripes

$600M

Series F

Oct 2021

Lead: Generation Investment Management

$300M

Series E

Apr 2021

Lead: Salesforce Ventures

$200M

Series D

Apr 2020

Lead: Stripes

$150M

Series C

Sep 2018

Lead: Felicis Ventures

$40M

Series B

Sep 2017

Lead: Accel

$22.2M

Seed

Jan 2016

Lead: CRV

$3M

Seed

Jan 2015

$2M

BioCatch

Series C

Mar 2020

Lead: Bain Capital Ventures

$40M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Snyk

StripesCoatueGoldman Sachs GrowthLakestarWiproGeneration Investment Management

Unique to BioCatch

Bain Capital VenturesAmerican Express Ventures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Snyk vs BioCatch

Is Snyk bigger than BioCatch?
By valuation, Snyk is the larger company at $7.4B versus $1.3B — a 5.7x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Snyk employs 2000 people while BioCatch has 100-500 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Snyk or BioCatch?
Snyk has raised more in total funding at $1.3B, compared to BioCatch's $213M — a gap of $1.1B. Combined, the two companies have completed 9 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Snyk leads with an Awaira Score of 82/100, while BioCatch sits at 80/100. That 2-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Snyk vs BioCatch?
Snyk was founded by Guy Podjarny in 2015. BioCatch was founded by Avi Turgeman in 2011. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Snyk do vs BioCatch?
Snyk: Snyk is a developer security platform founded in 2015 that specializes in identifying and fixing vulnerabilities in open-source dependencies, container images, and infrastructure-as-code. The company operates at the intersection of DevSecOps and AI, providing automated scanning and remediation tools integrated into development workflows. Snyk's core products include dependency scanning, container security, infrastructure-as-code scanning, and code analysis capabilities powered by machine learning and vulnerability intelligence databases. The platform integrates with popular development tools and CI/CD pipelines including GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Jenkins, enabling developers to identify security issues during development rather than post-deployment. With a valuation of $7.4 billion and total funding of $1.32 billion across Series G funding, Snyk has achieved significant growth in the expanding application security market. The company serves enterprise customers across multiple industries, addressing the critical challenge of securing software supply chains as organizations increasingly rely on open-source components. Snyk competes with companies including Sonatype, Aqua Security, and Anchore in the developer-first security space. The platform's approach emphasizes shifting security left in the development lifecycle, reducing remediation costs and time-to-fix vulnerabilities. Growth has been driven by increasing regulatory requirements, rising software supply chain attacks, and enterprise adoption of DevSecOps practices. Snyk uniquely positions security enforcement at the point of code development, enabling developers to fix vulnerabilities before deployment with AI-powered remediation guidance. BioCatch: BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. The Tel Aviv company processes behavioural signals from hundreds of millions of user sessions monthly, building individual profiles that flag deviations indicating fraud.\n\nThe company raised approximately $213 million in venture funding including a Series D led by Tiger Global, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. BioCatch counts over 30 tier-one banks globally among its clients including American Express, NatWest, and Lloyds Banking Group, with deployments protecting online banking and mobile banking sessions from fraud that bypasses traditional authentication controls. The platform is particularly effective against malware-assisted fraud and social engineering scams where the genuine account holder is unknowingly manipulated.\n\nBioCatch competes in the behavioural biometrics and fraud intelligence market alongside ThreatMetrix (now LexisNexis Risk Solutions), Sift, and Sardine, as well as traditional fraud management platforms from FICO and SAS. Its differentiation is the depth of its behavioural feature engineering from passive interaction signals that do not require active user participation, creating a fraud layer that operates continuously without adding friction to legitimate user journeys. The growing prevalence of authorised push payment fraud and social engineering attacks in European banking has expanded the relevant use case for BioCatch beyond traditional account takeover detection.
Which company was founded first?
BioCatch got there first, launching in 2011 — that's 4 years of extra runway. Snyk didn't arrive until 2015. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Snyk has about 2000 employees; BioCatch has about 100-500. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Snyk and BioCatch competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Snyk and BioCatch compete in AI Security, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

It's close. Both Snyk and BioCatch are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.

Who Should You Watch?

This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive