Overall Winner: Butterfly Network·85/ 100

Butterfly Network vs Deep Genomics

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Winner
B
Butterfly Network

🇺🇸 United States · John Martin

PublicAI HealthcareEst. 2011

Valuation

$1.5B

Total Funding

$700M

85
Awaira Score85/100

500-1000 employees

Full Butterfly Network Profile →
D
Deep Genomics

🇨🇦 Canada · Brendan Frey

Series CAI HealthcareEst. 2015

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$180M

68
Awaira Score68/100

100-500 employees

Full Deep Genomics Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Butterfly Network and Deep Genomics compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging. Deep Genomics applies deep learning to genetic medicine discovery, using AI models trained on genomic sequence data to predict the functional consequences of genetic variants, identify RNA splicing defects that underlie genetic diseases, and generate novel therapeutic candidates including antisense oligonucleotides and small molecules that correct disease-causing genetic variants.

Butterfly Network carries a known valuation of $1.5B, while Deep Genomics's valuation has not been publicly disclosed. On the funding side, Butterfly Network has raised $700M in total — $520M more than Deep Genomics's $180M.

Butterfly Network has 4 years more market experience, having been founded in 2011 compared to Deep Genomics's 2015 founding. In terms of growth stage, Butterfly Network is at Public while Deep Genomics is at Series C — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Butterfly Network operates out of 🇺🇸 United States while Deep Genomics is based in 🇨🇦 Canada, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Butterfly Network leads with a score of 85, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricButterfly NetworkDeep Genomics
💰Valuation
$1.5B
N/A
📈Total Funding
$700MWINS
$180M
📅Founded
2011
2015WINS
🚀Stage
Public
Series C
👥Employees
500-1000
100-500
🌍Country
United States
Canada
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
85WINS
68

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Butterfly Network has raised $520M more ($700M vs $180M)

📅

Market experience: Butterfly Network has 4 years more (founded 2011 vs 2015)

🚀

Growth stage: Butterfly Network is at Public vs Deep Genomics at Series C

👥

Team size: Butterfly Network has 500-1000 employees vs Deep Genomics's 100-500

🌍

Market base: 🇺🇸 Butterfly Network (United States) vs 🇨🇦 Deep Genomics (Canada)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Awaira Score: Butterfly Network scores 85/100 vs Deep Genomics's 68/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

B

Choose Butterfly Network if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 68/100
  • More established by valuation ($1.5B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $700M
  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging
D

Choose Deep Genomics if…

  • Canada-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Deep Genomics applies deep learning to genetic medicine discovery, using AI models trained on genomic sequence data to predict the functional consequences of genetic variants, identify RNA splicing defects that underlie genetic diseases, and generate novel therapeutic candidates including antisense oligonucleotides and small molecules that correct disease-causing genetic variants

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Butterfly Network vs Deep Genomics

Is Butterfly Network bigger than Deep Genomics?
Butterfly Network has a disclosed valuation of $1.5B, while Deep Genomics's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Butterfly Network employs 500-1000 people.
Which company raised more funding — Butterfly Network or Deep Genomics?
Butterfly Network has raised more in total funding at $700M, compared to Deep Genomics's $180M — a gap of $520M.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Butterfly Network holds the higher Awaira Score at 85/100, compared to Deep Genomics's 68/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 17-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Butterfly Network vs Deep Genomics?
Butterfly Network was founded by John Martin in 2011. Deep Genomics was founded by Brendan Frey in 2015. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Butterfly Network do vs Deep Genomics?
Butterfly Network: Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging. The AI software layer provides real-time image interpretation guidance, enabling clinicians with limited ultrasound training to perform diagnostic scans at the bedside.\n\nThe company is publicly traded on the NYSE under the ticker BFLY and raised over 700 million USD prior to and through its public listing. Butterfly has deployed devices across hospitals, emergency rooms, and point-of-care settings in over 50 countries, with particular penetration in resource-limited healthcare settings where traditional ultrasound equipment is prohibitively expensive or unavailable.\n\nPortable AI-assisted diagnostic imaging represents a structural shift in how and where medical imaging is performed. Butterfly Network has created a defensible position through its proprietary chip architecture, which competitors cannot easily replicate, and through its growing library of AI-assisted clinical guidance tools. The transition from hospital-based imaging to point-of-care diagnostics powered by AI guidance is a multi-decade trend that positions Butterfly at the center of a fundamental change in diagnostic medicine. Deep Genomics: Deep Genomics applies deep learning to genetic medicine discovery, using AI models trained on genomic sequence data to predict the functional consequences of genetic variants, identify RNA splicing defects that underlie genetic diseases, and generate novel therapeutic candidates including antisense oligonucleotides and small molecules that correct disease-causing genetic variants. The Toronto company was founded by Brendan Frey, a University of Toronto machine learning professor who collaborated with Geoffrey Hinton on deep learning research.\n\nThe company raised approximately $180 million in venture funding from investors including True Ventures, AlleyCorp, and GV (Google Ventures). Deep Genomics has built an AI drug discovery platform called the AI Workbench that integrates genomic data, disease biology, and AI prediction across the therapeutic discovery pipeline, and has entered a strategic alliance with Agenus to develop cancer treatments using its AI-designed oligonucleotide candidates.\n\nDeep Genomics competes in the AI genetic medicine space against Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Insitro, Exscientia, and gene therapy companies building computational biology capabilities. Its specific focus on RNA biology and oligonucleotide therapeutics, which represent a growing class of approved genetic medicines, differentiates it from platforms focused on small molecule drug discovery or cell therapy. The Toronto University of Toronto AI ecosystem, including connections to the Vector Institute and the Hinton research lineage, provides research credibility and talent access that distinguishes Canadian AI drug discovery from international competitors.
Which company was founded first?
Butterfly Network was founded first in 2011, giving it 4 years of additional market experience. Deep Genomics was founded later in 2015. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Butterfly Network has approximately 500-1000 employees, while Deep Genomics has approximately 100-500. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Butterfly Network and Deep Genomics competitors?
Yes, Butterfly Network and Deep Genomics are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Healthcare space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.