Butterfly Network vs Deep Genomics
In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
🇺🇸 United States · John Martin
Valuation
$1.5B
Total Funding
$700M
500-1000 employees
🇨🇦 Canada · Brendan Frey
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$180M
100-500 employees
Analyst Summary
Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations
Both Butterfly Network and Deep Genomics compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging. Deep Genomics applies deep learning to genetic medicine discovery, using AI models trained on genomic sequence data to predict the functional consequences of genetic variants, identify RNA splicing defects that underlie genetic diseases, and generate novel therapeutic candidates including antisense oligonucleotides and small molecules that correct disease-causing genetic variants.
Butterfly Network carries a known valuation of $1.5B, while Deep Genomics's valuation has not been publicly disclosed. On the funding side, Butterfly Network has raised $700M in total — $520M more than Deep Genomics's $180M.
Butterfly Network has 4 years more market experience, having been founded in 2011 compared to Deep Genomics's 2015 founding. In terms of growth stage, Butterfly Network is at Public while Deep Genomics is at Series C — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.
Butterfly Network operates out of 🇺🇸 United States while Deep Genomics is based in 🇨🇦 Canada, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Butterfly Network leads with a score of 85, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Butterfly Network | Deep Genomics |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $1.5B | N/A |
📈Total Funding | $700MWINS | $180M |
📅Founded | 2011 | 2015WINS |
🚀Stage | Public | Series C |
👥Employees | 500-1000 | 100-500 |
🌍Country | United States | Canada |
🏷️Category | AI Healthcare | AI Healthcare |
⭐Awaira Score | 85WINS | 68 |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Butterfly Network has raised $520M more ($700M vs $180M)
Market experience: Butterfly Network has 4 years more (founded 2011 vs 2015)
Growth stage: Butterfly Network is at Public vs Deep Genomics at Series C
Team size: Butterfly Network has 500-1000 employees vs Deep Genomics's 100-500
Market base: 🇺🇸 Butterfly Network (United States) vs 🇨🇦 Deep Genomics (Canada)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment
Awaira Score: Butterfly Network scores 85/100 vs Deep Genomics's 68/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Butterfly Network if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 68/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($1.5B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $700M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging
Choose Deep Genomics if…
- ✓Canada-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Deep Genomics applies deep learning to genetic medicine discovery, using AI models trained on genomic sequence data to predict the functional consequences of genetic variants, identify RNA splicing defects that underlie genetic diseases, and generate novel therapeutic candidates including antisense oligonucleotides and small molecules that correct disease-causing genetic variants