Overall Winner: Butterfly Network·85/ 100

Butterfly Network vs Healx

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Winner
B
Butterfly Network

🇺🇸 United States · John Martin

PublicAI HealthcareEst. 2011

Valuation

$1.5B

Total Funding

$700M

85
Awaira Score85/100

500-1000 employees

Full Butterfly Network Profile →
H
Healx

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Tim Guilliams

Series BAI HealthcareEst. 2014

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$47M

55
Awaira Score55/100

1-50 employees

Full Healx Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Butterfly Network and Healx compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging. Healx uses AI to identify and develop treatments for rare diseases, applying graph neural networks and multi-omics data analysis to repurpose existing approved drugs for new orphan disease indications.

Butterfly Network carries a known valuation of $1.5B, while Healx's valuation has not been publicly disclosed. On the funding side, Butterfly Network has raised $700M in total — $653M more than Healx's $47M.

Butterfly Network has 3 years more market experience, having been founded in 2011 compared to Healx's 2014 founding. In terms of growth stage, Butterfly Network is at Public while Healx is at Series B — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Butterfly Network operates out of 🇺🇸 United States while Healx is based in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Butterfly Network leads with a score of 85, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricButterfly NetworkHealx
💰Valuation
$1.5B
N/A
📈Total Funding
$700MWINS
$47M
📅Founded
2011
2014WINS
🚀Stage
Public
Series B
👥Employees
500-1000
1-50
🌍Country
United States
United Kingdom
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
85WINS
55

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Butterfly Network has raised $653M more ($700M vs $47M)

📅

Market experience: Butterfly Network has 3 years more (founded 2011 vs 2014)

🚀

Growth stage: Butterfly Network is at Public vs Healx at Series B

👥

Team size: Butterfly Network has 500-1000 employees vs Healx's 1-50

🌍

Market base: 🇺🇸 Butterfly Network (United States) vs 🇬🇧 Healx (United Kingdom)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Awaira Score: Butterfly Network scores 85/100 vs Healx's 55/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

B

Choose Butterfly Network if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 55/100
  • More established by valuation ($1.5B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $700M
  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging
H

Choose Healx if…

  • United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Healx uses AI to identify and develop treatments for rare diseases, applying graph neural networks and multi-omics data analysis to repurpose existing approved drugs for new orphan disease indications

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Butterfly Network vs Healx

Is Butterfly Network bigger than Healx?
Butterfly Network has a disclosed valuation of $1.5B, while Healx's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Butterfly Network employs 500-1000 people.
Which company raised more funding — Butterfly Network or Healx?
Butterfly Network has raised more in total funding at $700M, compared to Healx's $47M — a gap of $653M.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Butterfly Network holds the higher Awaira Score at 85/100, compared to Healx's 55/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 30-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Butterfly Network vs Healx?
Butterfly Network was founded by John Martin in 2011. Healx was founded by Tim Guilliams in 2014. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Butterfly Network do vs Healx?
Butterfly Network: Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging. The AI software layer provides real-time image interpretation guidance, enabling clinicians with limited ultrasound training to perform diagnostic scans at the bedside.\n\nThe company is publicly traded on the NYSE under the ticker BFLY and raised over 700 million USD prior to and through its public listing. Butterfly has deployed devices across hospitals, emergency rooms, and point-of-care settings in over 50 countries, with particular penetration in resource-limited healthcare settings where traditional ultrasound equipment is prohibitively expensive or unavailable.\n\nPortable AI-assisted diagnostic imaging represents a structural shift in how and where medical imaging is performed. Butterfly Network has created a defensible position through its proprietary chip architecture, which competitors cannot easily replicate, and through its growing library of AI-assisted clinical guidance tools. The transition from hospital-based imaging to point-of-care diagnostics powered by AI guidance is a multi-decade trend that positions Butterfly at the center of a fundamental change in diagnostic medicine. Healx: Healx uses AI to identify and develop treatments for rare diseases, applying graph neural networks and multi-omics data analysis to repurpose existing approved drugs for new orphan disease indications. The Cambridge-based company focuses exclusively on rare diseases, where the small patient populations and limited existing literature make traditional drug discovery economically unviable without computational approaches that can extract signal from sparse data.\n\nThe company raised a $47 million Series B led by Balderton Capital and includes strategic investors from the rare disease patient advocacy community. Healx has assembled a pipeline of repurposing candidates for conditions including Fragile X syndrome, tuberous sclerosis complex, and other rare neurodevelopmental disorders, with several candidates advancing into clinical studies. The company partners with patient advocacy groups to access natural history data and patient registries that inform its disease models.\n\nHealx operates in a rare disease AI market that is less crowded than oncology-focused drug discovery AI but equally challenging due to regulatory complexity and small trial populations. The company competes with Healios, BenevolentAI, and specialist rare disease biotechs that are increasingly adopting computational methods. Its exclusive focus on rare diseases and its community partnerships represent a defensible niche that larger generalist AI drug discovery platforms have not prioritised.
Which company was founded first?
Butterfly Network was founded first in 2011, giving it 3 years of additional market experience. Healx was founded later in 2014. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Butterfly Network has approximately 500-1000 employees, while Healx has approximately 1-50. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Butterfly Network and Healx competitors?
Yes, Butterfly Network and Healx are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Healthcare space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.