Skip to main content

Nabla vs Biofourmis

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Nabla is valued at $180M — more than 3x Biofourmis's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Biofourmis leads on 3 of 4 metrics

Nabla

0 wins

-Funding
=Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Biofourmis

3 wins

+Funding
=Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$180M
N/A
Total Funding
$131M
$465M
Awaira Score
73/100
73/100
Employees
80
100-500
Founded
2018
2015
Stage
Series C
Acquired
NablaBiofourmis
Winner
Nabla logo
Nabla

🇫🇷 France · Alexandre Lebrun

Series CAI HealthcareEst. 2018

Valuation

$180M

Total Funding

$131M

Awaira Score73/100

80 employees

Full Nabla Profile →
Biofourmis logo
Biofourmis

🇸🇬 Singapore · Kuldeep Singh

AcquiredAI HealthcareEst. 2015

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$465M

Awaira Score73/100

100-500 employees

Full Biofourmis Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Healthcare space, though from different geographies — Nabla in France and Biofourmis in Singapore. Different stages (Series C vs Acquired) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Nabla and Biofourmis are direct competitors in AI Healthcare. Nabla is a French AI health company founded in 2018 that develops artificial intelligence solutions for clinical documentation and patient care workflows. Biofourmis develops AI-powered digital therapeutics and remote patient monitoring technology that combines wearable biosensor data with machine learning models to predict clinical deterioration, monitor chronic disease progression, and support clinical trial digital endpoint measurement.

Funding & Valuation

Only Nabla has a public valuation on record ($180M); Biofourmis's has not been disclosed. On the funding front, Biofourmis has secured $465M, outpacing Nabla's $131M by $334M.

Growth Stage

Established in 2015, Biofourmis has a modest 3-year head start over Nabla (2018). Growth stages differ: Nabla (Series C) versus Biofourmis (Acquired), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Headcount tells a story too: Nabla has 80 employees and Biofourmis has 100-500.

Geography & Outlook

Based in 🇫🇷 France and 🇸🇬 Singapore respectively, Nabla and Biofourmis tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. The Awaira Score reflects a tight race: 73 for Nabla versus 73 for Biofourmis. Under Alexandre Lebrun and Kuldeep Singh respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Nabla

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round SizeN/A

Biofourmis

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$300M

Funding History

Nabla has completed 1 funding round, while Biofourmis has gone through 1. Nabla's most recent round was a Seed, compared to Biofourmis's Series D ($300M). Nabla is at Series C while Biofourmis is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Nabla has about 80 people and Biofourmis has around 100-500. Biofourmis has a 3-year head start, founded in 2015 vs Nabla's 2018. Geographically, they're in different markets — Nabla operates out of France and Biofourmis from Singapore.

Metrics Comparison

MetricNablaBiofourmis
💰Valuation
$180M
N/A
📈Total Funding
$131M
$465MWINS
📅Founded
2018WINS
2015
🚀Stage
Series C
Acquired
👥Employees
80
100-500
🌍Country
France
Singapore
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
73
73

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Biofourmis has raised $334M more ($465M vs $131M)

📅

Market experience: Biofourmis has 3 years more (founded 2015 vs 2018)

🚀

Growth stage: Nabla is at Series C vs Biofourmis at Acquired

👥

Team size: Nabla has 80 employees vs Biofourmis's 100-500

🌍

Market base: 🇫🇷 Nabla (France) vs 🇸🇬 Biofourmis (Singapore)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Nabla logo

Choose Nabla if…

Top Pick
  • More established by valuation ($180M)
  • France-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Nabla is a French AI health company founded in 2018 that develops artificial intelligence solutions for clinical documentation and patient care workflows
Biofourmis logo

Choose Biofourmis if…

  • Stronger investor backing — raised $465M
  • More market experience — founded in 2015
  • Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Biofourmis develops AI-powered digital therapeutics and remote patient monitoring technology that combines wearable biosensor data with machine learning models to predict clinical deterioration, monitor chronic disease progression, and support clinical trial digital endpoint measurement

Funding History

Nabla raised $131M across 1 round. Biofourmis raised $465M across 1 round.

Nabla

Seed

Jan 2018

Biofourmis

Series D

Dec 2021

Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2

$300M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Biofourmis

SoftBank Vision Fund 2General Atlantic

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Nabla vs Biofourmis

Is Nabla bigger than Biofourmis?
Nabla has a disclosed valuation of $180M, while Biofourmis's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Nabla employs 80 people.
Which company raised more funding — Nabla or Biofourmis?
Biofourmis has raised more in total funding at $465M, compared to Nabla's $131M — a gap of $334M. Combined, the two companies have completed 2 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
It's a dead heat — both Nabla and Biofourmis sit at 73/100 on the Awaira Score. That score factors in valuation, funding, stage, headcount, and category.
Who founded Nabla vs Biofourmis?
Nabla was founded by Alexandre Lebrun in 2018. Biofourmis was founded by Kuldeep Singh in 2015. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Nabla do vs Biofourmis?
Nabla: Nabla is a French AI health company founded in 2018 that develops artificial intelligence solutions for clinical documentation and patient care workflows. The company has raised $30M in total funding and operates at Series B stage with a valuation of $200M. Nabla's core offering focuses on AI-powered clinical documentation tools designed to reduce administrative burden on healthcare providers. The platform applies natural language processing and machine learning to automate medical note-taking, allowing physicians to spend more time with patients rather than on paperwork. The company targets hospitals, clinics, and healthcare systems across Europe, with particular strength in the French market. Nabla's technology integrates with existing electronic health record systems and clinical workflows. The company competes in the growing digital health and healthcare AI sector alongside players focused on clinical automation and documentation efficiency. Nabla's approach emphasizes practical integration into existing healthcare infrastructure rather than building standalone applications. The company has demonstrated traction in European healthcare markets where administrative burden on clinicians remains significant. Its Series B funding stage indicates successful product-market fit validation and positions Nabla for expanded market reach and product development in the healthcare AI space. Nabla addresses the specific pain point of clinical documentation burden through AI automation, allowing European healthcare providers to improve operational efficiency. Biofourmis: Biofourmis develops AI-powered digital therapeutics and remote patient monitoring technology that combines wearable biosensor data with machine learning models to predict clinical deterioration, monitor chronic disease progression, and support clinical trial digital endpoint measurement. The Singapore company platform processes continuous physiological data streams from patients in hospital-at-home programs, enabling earlier clinical intervention and reducing avoidable readmissions for heart failure, oncology, and post-surgical patients.\n\nThe company raised approximately $445 million including a Series D from investors including SoftBank Vision Fund 2, Openspace Ventures, and Mass General Brigham Ventures. Biofourmis has built partnerships with health systems including Brigham and Women Hospital, Guy Hospital, and several major Asian health systems for remote monitoring program deployment, and has entered into pharmaceutical partnerships for using its digital monitoring platform as a clinical trial measurement tool to capture digital endpoints.\n\nBiofourmis competes in the remote patient monitoring and digital therapeutics market against BioIntelliSense, Current Health, and Validic, as well as the monitoring capabilities of established medical device companies including Philips and Masimo that are adding AI analytics to their remote monitoring platforms. The hospital-at-home model, which uses continuous remote monitoring AI to substitute inpatient hospital stays for selected patient populations, represents a significant healthcare cost reduction opportunity that health systems in the US, UK, and Asia are actively piloting.
Which company was founded first?
Biofourmis got there first, launching in 2015 — that's 3 years of extra runway. Nabla didn't arrive until 2018. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Nabla has about 80 employees; Biofourmis has about 100-500. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Nabla and Biofourmis competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Nabla and Biofourmis compete in AI Healthcare, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

It's close. Both Nabla and Biofourmis are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.

Who Should You Watch?

This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive