Overall Winner: Butterfly Network·85/ 100

Butterfly Network vs Niramai

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Winner
B
Butterfly Network

🇺🇸 United States · John Martin

PublicAI HealthcareEst. 2011

Valuation

$1.5B

Total Funding

$700M

85
Awaira Score85/100

500-1000 employees

Full Butterfly Network Profile →
N
Niramai

🇮🇳 India · Geetha Manjunath

Series BAI HealthcareEst. 2016

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$17M

60
Awaira Score60/100

50-200 employees

Full Niramai Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Butterfly Network and Niramai compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging. Niramai has developed a radiation-free, non-contact breast cancer screening solution that uses thermal imaging combined with AI-powered image analysis to detect early-stage breast cancer, addressing the significant access and cost barriers that prevent widespread mammography screening in low- and middle-income countries.

Butterfly Network carries a known valuation of $1.5B, while Niramai's valuation has not been publicly disclosed. On the funding side, Butterfly Network has raised $700M in total — $683M more than Niramai's $17M.

Butterfly Network has 5 years more market experience, having been founded in 2011 compared to Niramai's 2016 founding. In terms of growth stage, Butterfly Network is at Public while Niramai is at Series B — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Butterfly Network operates out of 🇺🇸 United States while Niramai is based in 🇮🇳 India, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Butterfly Network leads with a score of 85, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricButterfly NetworkNiramai
💰Valuation
$1.5B
N/A
📈Total Funding
$700MWINS
$17M
📅Founded
2011
2016WINS
🚀Stage
Public
Series B
👥Employees
500-1000
50-200
🌍Country
United States
India
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
85WINS
60

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Butterfly Network has raised $683M more ($700M vs $17M)

📅

Market experience: Butterfly Network has 5 years more (founded 2011 vs 2016)

🚀

Growth stage: Butterfly Network is at Public vs Niramai at Series B

👥

Team size: Butterfly Network has 500-1000 employees vs Niramai's 50-200

🌍

Market base: 🇺🇸 Butterfly Network (United States) vs 🇮🇳 Niramai (India)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Awaira Score: Butterfly Network scores 85/100 vs Niramai's 60/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

B

Choose Butterfly Network if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 60/100
  • More established by valuation ($1.5B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $700M
  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging
N

Choose Niramai if…

  • India-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Niramai has developed a radiation-free, non-contact breast cancer screening solution that uses thermal imaging combined with AI-powered image analysis to detect early-stage breast cancer, addressing the significant access and cost barriers that prevent widespread mammography screening in low- and middle-income countries

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Butterfly Network vs Niramai

Is Butterfly Network bigger than Niramai?
Butterfly Network has a disclosed valuation of $1.5B, while Niramai's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Butterfly Network employs 500-1000 people.
Which company raised more funding — Butterfly Network or Niramai?
Butterfly Network has raised more in total funding at $700M, compared to Niramai's $17M — a gap of $683M.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Butterfly Network holds the higher Awaira Score at 85/100, compared to Niramai's 60/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 25-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Butterfly Network vs Niramai?
Butterfly Network was founded by John Martin in 2011. Niramai was founded by Geetha Manjunath in 2016. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Butterfly Network do vs Niramai?
Butterfly Network: Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging. The AI software layer provides real-time image interpretation guidance, enabling clinicians with limited ultrasound training to perform diagnostic scans at the bedside.\n\nThe company is publicly traded on the NYSE under the ticker BFLY and raised over 700 million USD prior to and through its public listing. Butterfly has deployed devices across hospitals, emergency rooms, and point-of-care settings in over 50 countries, with particular penetration in resource-limited healthcare settings where traditional ultrasound equipment is prohibitively expensive or unavailable.\n\nPortable AI-assisted diagnostic imaging represents a structural shift in how and where medical imaging is performed. Butterfly Network has created a defensible position through its proprietary chip architecture, which competitors cannot easily replicate, and through its growing library of AI-assisted clinical guidance tools. The transition from hospital-based imaging to point-of-care diagnostics powered by AI guidance is a multi-decade trend that positions Butterfly at the center of a fundamental change in diagnostic medicine. Niramai: Niramai has developed a radiation-free, non-contact breast cancer screening solution that uses thermal imaging combined with AI-powered image analysis to detect early-stage breast cancer, addressing the significant access and cost barriers that prevent widespread mammography screening in low- and middle-income countries. The technology works without X-ray radiation, requires no radiologist for initial interpretation, and can be deployed in mobile screening units.\n\nThe company raised approximately $17M in Series B funding and has conducted clinical validation studies demonstrating sensitivity and specificity metrics competitive with mammography for early detection. Niramai has deployed its screening solution at hospitals, corporate wellness programs, and rural health camps across India.\n\nBreast cancer is the most common cancer among Indian women, yet screening rates remain critically low due to equipment costs, specialist shortages, and cultural barriers to mammography. Niramai's AI-powered thermal screening addresses each of these barriers simultaneously, positioning the company at the intersection of AI healthcare innovation and a major Indian public health challenge.
Which company was founded first?
Butterfly Network was founded first in 2011, giving it 5 years of additional market experience. Niramai was founded later in 2016. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Butterfly Network has approximately 500-1000 employees, while Niramai has approximately 50-200. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Butterfly Network and Niramai competitors?
Yes, Butterfly Network and Niramai are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Healthcare space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.