Overall Winner: Qure.ai·70/ 100
VS
Q
Qure.aiWinner

Healx vs Qure.ai

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

H
Healx

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Tim Guilliams

Series BAI HealthcareEst. 2014

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$47M

55
Awaira Score55/100

1-50 employees

Full Healx Profile →
Winner
Q
Qure.ai

🇮🇳 India · Prashant Warier

Series DAI HealthcareEst. 2016

Valuation

$270M

Total Funding

$157M

70
Awaira Score70/100

250 employees

Full Qure.ai Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Healx and Qure.ai compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Healx uses AI to identify and develop treatments for rare diseases, applying graph neural networks and multi-omics data analysis to repurpose existing approved drugs for new orphan disease indications. Qure.

Qure.ai carries a known valuation of $270M, while Healx's valuation has not been publicly disclosed. On the funding side, Qure.ai has raised $157M in total — $110M more than Healx's $47M.

Healx has 2 years more market experience, having been founded in 2014 compared to Qure.ai's 2016 founding. In terms of growth stage, Healx is at Series B while Qure.ai is at Series D — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Healx operates out of 🇬🇧 United Kingdom while Qure.ai is based in 🇮🇳 India, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Qure.ai leads with a score of 70, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricHealxQure.ai
💰Valuation
N/A
$270M
📈Total Funding
$47M
$157MWINS
📅Founded
2014
2016WINS
🚀Stage
Series B
Series D
👥Employees
1-50
250
🌍Country
United Kingdom
India
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
55
70WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Qure.ai has raised $110M more ($157M vs $47M)

📅

Market experience: Healx has 2 years more (founded 2014 vs 2016)

🚀

Growth stage: Healx is at Series B vs Qure.ai at Series D

👥

Team size: Healx has 1-50 employees vs Qure.ai's 250

🌍

Market base: 🇬🇧 Healx (United Kingdom) vs 🇮🇳 Qure.ai (India)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Awaira Score: Qure.ai scores 70/100 vs Healx's 55/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

H

Choose Healx if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2014
  • United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Healx uses AI to identify and develop treatments for rare diseases, applying graph neural networks and multi-omics data analysis to repurpose existing approved drugs for new orphan disease indications
Q

Choose Qure.ai if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 70/100 vs 55/100
  • More established by valuation ($270M)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $157M
  • India-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Qure

Funding History

Healx raised $47M across 0 rounds. Qure.ai raised $157M across 5 rounds.

Healx

No public funding data available.

Qure.ai

Series D

Jan 2021

$81M

Series C

Jan 2020

$50M

Series B

Jan 2018

$20M

Series A

Jan 2017

Lead: Accel Partners

$6M

Seed

Jan 2016

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Qure.ai

Accel PartnersBessemer Venture PartnersGoogle

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Healx vs Qure.ai

Is Healx bigger than Qure.ai?
Qure.ai has a disclosed valuation of $270M, while Healx's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Qure.ai employs 250 people.
Which company raised more funding — Healx or Qure.ai?
Qure.ai has raised more in total funding at $157M, compared to Healx's $47M — a gap of $110M. Combined, the two companies have completed 5 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Qure.ai holds the higher Awaira Score at 70/100, compared to Healx's 55/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 15-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Healx vs Qure.ai?
Healx was founded by Tim Guilliams in 2014. Qure.ai was founded by Prashant Warier in 2016. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Healx do vs Qure.ai?
Healx: Healx uses AI to identify and develop treatments for rare diseases, applying graph neural networks and multi-omics data analysis to repurpose existing approved drugs for new orphan disease indications. The Cambridge-based company focuses exclusively on rare diseases, where the small patient populations and limited existing literature make traditional drug discovery economically unviable without computational approaches that can extract signal from sparse data.\n\nThe company raised a $47 million Series B led by Balderton Capital and includes strategic investors from the rare disease patient advocacy community. Healx has assembled a pipeline of repurposing candidates for conditions including Fragile X syndrome, tuberous sclerosis complex, and other rare neurodevelopmental disorders, with several candidates advancing into clinical studies. The company partners with patient advocacy groups to access natural history data and patient registries that inform its disease models.\n\nHealx operates in a rare disease AI market that is less crowded than oncology-focused drug discovery AI but equally challenging due to regulatory complexity and small trial populations. The company competes with Healios, BenevolentAI, and specialist rare disease biotechs that are increasingly adopting computational methods. Its exclusive focus on rare diseases and its community partnerships represent a defensible niche that larger generalist AI drug discovery platforms have not prioritised. Qure.ai: Qure.ai is an Indian artificial intelligence company founded in 2016 that develops machine learning solutions for diagnostic imaging in healthcare. The company specializes in computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems that analyze medical imaging data including chest X-rays, CT scans, and mammograms to identify abnormalities and assist radiologists in clinical decision-making. Its platform uses deep learning algorithms trained on large datasets to detect conditions such as tuberculosis, COVID-19, lung cancer, and other pathologies. Qure.ai's products are deployed across hospitals and diagnostic centers in India and internationally, serving both institutional healthcare providers and diagnostic chains. The company has secured $157 million in total funding and operates at Series D stage with a valuation of $300 million as of recent rounds. Its technology addresses the shortage of radiologists in developing markets while improving diagnostic accuracy and turnaround times. Qure.ai competes in the medical AI space alongside companies like IBM Watson Health, Zebra Medical Vision, and various regional diagnostic AI providers. The company has demonstrated strong traction in the Indian healthcare market and has expanded its reach to international markets. Its growth trajectory reflects increasing adoption of AI-assisted diagnostic solutions globally and the rising demand for scalable healthcare technologies in resource-constrained settings. Qure.ai focuses specifically on diagnostic imaging AI for markets with radiologist shortages, positioning it distinctly within underserved geographies.
Which company was founded first?
Healx was founded first in 2014, giving it 2 years of additional market experience. Qure.ai was founded later in 2016. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Healx has approximately 1-50 employees, while Qure.ai has approximately 250. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Healx and Qure.ai competitors?
Yes, Healx and Qure.ai are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Healthcare space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.