Overall Winner: Abnormal Security·80/ 100

Abnormal Security vs BioCatch

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Winner
A
Abnormal Security

🇺🇸 United States · Evan Reiser

Series DAI SecurityEst. 2018

Valuation

$5.1B

Total Funding

$546M

80
Awaira Score80/100

650 employees

Full Abnormal Security Profile →
B
BioCatch

🇮🇱 Israel · Avi Turgeman

Series DAI SecurityEst. 2011

Valuation

$1B

Total Funding

$213M

80
Awaira Score80/100

100-500 employees

Full BioCatch Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Abnormal Security and BioCatch compete directly in the AI Security space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Abnormal Security is an AI-focused cybersecurity company founded in 2018 that specializes in email and cloud security. BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions.

Abnormal Security carries a valuation of $5.1B, which is 5.1x higher than BioCatch's $1B. On the funding side, Abnormal Security has raised $546M in total — $333M more than BioCatch's $213M.

BioCatch has 7 years more market experience, having been founded in 2011 compared to Abnormal Security's 2018 founding. Both companies are currently at the Series D stage of their journey.

Abnormal Security operates out of 🇺🇸 United States while BioCatch is based in 🇮🇱 Israel, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, both companies are closely matched — Abnormal Security scores 80 and BioCatch scores 80.

Metrics Comparison

MetricAbnormal SecurityBioCatch
💰Valuation
$5.1BWINS
$1B
📈Total Funding
$546MWINS
$213M
📅Founded
2018WINS
2011
🚀Stage
Series D
Series D
👥Employees
650
100-500
🌍Country
United States
Israel
🏷️Category
AI Security
AI Security
Awaira Score
80
80

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Abnormal Security is valued 5.1x higher ($5.1B vs $1B)

📈

Funding gap: Abnormal Security has raised $333M more ($546M vs $213M)

📅

Market experience: BioCatch has 7 years more (founded 2011 vs 2018)

👥

Team size: Abnormal Security has 650 employees vs BioCatch's 100-500

🌍

Market base: 🇺🇸 Abnormal Security (United States) vs 🇮🇱 BioCatch (Israel)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Security market segment

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

A

Choose Abnormal Security if…

Top Pick
  • More established by valuation ($5.1B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $546M
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Abnormal Security is an AI-focused cybersecurity company founded in 2018 that specializes in email and cloud security
B

Choose BioCatch if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions

Funding History

Abnormal Security raised $546M across 8 rounds. BioCatch raised $213M across 0 rounds.

Abnormal Security

Series D

May 2023

Lead: ICONIQ Growth

$336M

Series C

Mar 2022

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$120M

Series D

Jan 2022

$301M

Series B

Feb 2021

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$60M

Series C

Jan 2021

$150M

Series A

Mar 2020

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$30M

Series B

Jan 2020

$75M

Series A

Jan 2019

Lead: Accel Partners

$20M

BioCatch

No public funding data available.

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Abnormal Security

Sequoia CapitalAccelIconiq CapitalSalesforce VenturesICONIQ GrowthMenlo Ventures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Abnormal Security vs BioCatch

Is Abnormal Security bigger than BioCatch?
By valuation, Abnormal Security is the larger company at $5.1B versus $1B — a 5.1x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Abnormal Security employs 650 people while BioCatch has 100-500 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Abnormal Security or BioCatch?
Abnormal Security has raised more in total funding at $546M, compared to BioCatch's $213M — a gap of $333M. Combined, the two companies have completed 8 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Both Abnormal Security and BioCatch share the same Awaira Score of 80/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric that factors in valuation, total funding raised, company stage, employee count, and market category.
Who founded Abnormal Security vs BioCatch?
Abnormal Security was founded by Evan Reiser in 2018. BioCatch was founded by Avi Turgeman in 2011. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Abnormal Security do vs BioCatch?
Abnormal Security: Abnormal Security is an AI-focused cybersecurity company founded in 2018 that specializes in email and cloud security. The company develops AI-powered threat detection systems designed to identify and prevent advanced email attacks, including phishing, business email compromise (BEC), and account takeover attempts. Its core platform uses behavioral AI and machine learning to analyze communication patterns and detect anomalies that traditional security tools miss. The company's technology focuses on cloud email environments, particularly Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, where it monitors user behavior, message content, and sender patterns in real-time. Abnormal Security has achieved a valuation of $5.1 billion following Series D funding, with total funding of $546 million. The company operates in a competitive landscape alongside established vendors like Proofpoint, Mimecast, and Cisco, as well as emerging AI security startups. Its positioning emphasizes reducing security alert fatigue through AI accuracy while preventing targeted attacks that evade traditional signature-based detection. The company has secured enterprise customers across various industries, though specific customer names are not widely disclosed. Growth trajectory indicates strong market demand for AI-driven email security solutions as organizations face increasingly sophisticated social engineering attacks. Abnormal Security represents the broader shift toward behavioral AI in enterprise security infrastructure. Abnormal Security applies behavioral AI specifically to email security, addressing a historically high-friction attack vector that traditional tools struggle to defend against effectively. BioCatch: BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. The Tel Aviv company processes behavioural signals from hundreds of millions of user sessions monthly, building individual profiles that flag deviations indicating fraud.\n\nThe company raised approximately $213 million in venture funding including a Series D led by Tiger Global, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. BioCatch counts over 30 tier-one banks globally among its clients including American Express, NatWest, and Lloyds Banking Group, with deployments protecting online banking and mobile banking sessions from fraud that bypasses traditional authentication controls. The platform is particularly effective against malware-assisted fraud and social engineering scams where the genuine account holder is unknowingly manipulated.\n\nBioCatch competes in the behavioural biometrics and fraud intelligence market alongside ThreatMetrix (now LexisNexis Risk Solutions), Sift, and Sardine, as well as traditional fraud management platforms from FICO and SAS. Its differentiation is the depth of its behavioural feature engineering from passive interaction signals that do not require active user participation, creating a fraud layer that operates continuously without adding friction to legitimate user journeys. The growing prevalence of authorised push payment fraud and social engineering attacks in European banking has expanded the relevant use case for BioCatch beyond traditional account takeover detection.
Which company was founded first?
BioCatch was founded first in 2011, giving it 7 years of additional market experience. Abnormal Security was founded later in 2018. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Abnormal Security has approximately 650 employees, while BioCatch has approximately 100-500. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Abnormal Security and BioCatch competitors?
Yes, Abnormal Security and BioCatch are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Security space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.