Skip to main content
Overall Winner: Cursor·87/ 100
Cursor logo
CursorWinner
VS

Cursor vs Replit

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Cursor is valued at $29.3B — more than 3x Replit's $9B.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Cursor leads on 3 of 5 metrics

Cursor

3 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
+Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Replit

2 wins

-Valuation
-Funding
-Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience
Winner
Cursor logo
Cursor

🇺🇸 United States · Michael Truell

Series DAI Dev ToolsEst. 2022

Valuation

$29.3B

Total Funding

$3.4B

Awaira Score87/100

50 employees

Full Cursor Profile →
Replit logo
Replit

🇺🇸 United States · Amjad Masad

Series BAI Dev ToolsEst. 2016

Valuation

$9B

Total Funding

$872M

Awaira Score79/100

100 employees

Full Replit Profile →
Market Context

Cursor and Replit are both AI Dev Tools companies based in United States, making this a direct domestic rivalry. The stage gap — Cursor at Series D vs Replit at Series B — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Cursor and Replit both operate in AI Dev Tools, though their strategies diverge significantly. Cursor is an AI-powered code editor founded in 2022 that has rapidly become a significant player in the AI developer tools market. Replit is a cloud-based integrated development environment (IDE) founded in 2016 that enables users to write, run, and deploy code directly in web browsers without local setup.

Cursor carries a valuation of $29.3B, which is 3.3x higher than Replit's $9B. With $3.4B raised, Cursor has attracted substantially more capital than Replit ($872M).

Cursor is the younger company by 6 years, having launched in 2022 compared to Replit's 2016 founding. Stage-wise, Cursor is classified as Series D and Replit as Series B, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. Team sizes also differ: Cursor employs 50 people versus Replit's 100.

Headquartered in 🇺🇸 United States, both Cursor and Replit draw from the same local ecosystem of talent and capital. Cursor holds a moderate edge on Awaira's composite score (87 vs. 79), driven by stronger fundamentals in funding and growth metrics. Cursor, led by Michael Truell, and Replit, led by Amjad Masad, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Key Numbers

Valuation
$29.3B
$9B
Total Funding
$3.4B
$872M
Awaira Score
87/100
79/100
Employees
50
100
Founded
2022
2016
Stage
Series D
Series B
CursorReplit

Funding Velocity

Cursor

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$1.2B
Funding Span3.9 yrs

Replit

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$58.8M
Funding Span3.5 yrs

Funding History

Cursor has completed 3 funding rounds, while Replit has gone through 3. Cursor's most recent round was a Series D of $2.3B, compared to Replit's Series B ($97.5M). Cursor is at Series D while Replit is at Series B — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Cursor has about 50 people and Replit has around 100. Replit has a 6-year head start, founded in 2016 vs Cursor's 2022. Both are based in United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricCursorReplit
💰Valuation
$29.3BWINS
$9B
📈Total Funding
$3.4BWINS
$872M
📅Founded
2022WINS
2016
🚀Stage
Series D
Series B
👥Employees
50
100
🌍Country
United States
United States
🏷️Category
AI Dev Tools
AI Dev Tools
Awaira Score
87WINS
79

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Cursor is valued 3.3x higher ($29.3B vs $9B)

📈

Funding gap: Cursor has raised $2.5B more ($3.4B vs $872M)

📅

Market experience: Replit has 6 years more (founded 2016 vs 2022)

🚀

Growth stage: Cursor is at Series D vs Replit at Series B

👥

Team size: Cursor has 50 employees vs Replit's 100

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Dev Tools market segment

Awaira Score: Cursor scores 87/100 vs Replit's 79/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Cursor logo

Choose Cursor if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 87/100 vs 79/100
  • More established by valuation ($29.3B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $3.4B
  • Cursor is an AI-powered code editor founded in 2022 that has rapidly become a significant player in the AI developer tools market
Replit logo

Choose Replit if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2016
  • Replit is a cloud-based integrated development environment (IDE) founded in 2016 that enables users to write, run, and deploy code directly in web browsers without local setup

Funding History

Cursor raised $3.4B across 3 rounds. Replit raised $872M across 3 rounds.

Cursor

Series D

Nov 2025

$2.3B

Series A

Aug 2024

Lead: Thrive Capital

$60M

Seed

Jan 2022

Replit

Series B

Jul 2021

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$97.5M

Series A

Sep 2019

Lead: Andreessen Horowitz

$20M

Seed

Jan 2018

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Cursor

Thrive CapitalFounders Fund

Unique to Replit

Sequoia CapitalAndreessen Horowitz

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Cursor vs Replit

Is Cursor bigger than Replit?
By valuation, Cursor is the larger company at $29.3B versus $9B — a 3.3x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Cursor employs 50 people while Replit has 100 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Cursor or Replit?
Cursor has raised more in total funding at $3.4B, compared to Replit's $872M — a gap of $2.5B. Combined, the two companies have completed 6 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Cursor leads with an Awaira Score of 87/100, while Replit sits at 79/100. That 8-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Cursor vs Replit?
Cursor was founded by Michael Truell in 2022. Replit was founded by Amjad Masad in 2016. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Cursor do vs Replit?
Cursor: Cursor is an AI-powered code editor founded in 2022 that has rapidly become a significant player in the AI developer tools market. The platform integrates advanced language models directly into the coding environment, enabling developers to write, edit, and debug code with AI assistance. Cursor's core functionality includes intelligent code completion, natural language-to-code generation, and contextual debugging features that operate within the editor interface. The company operates in the competitive landscape alongside GitHub Copilot and other AI coding assistants, distinguishing itself through its editor-first approach and emphasis on code understanding. Cursor has achieved a $29.3 billion valuation following $3.4 billion in total funding across multiple rounds, including its Series D stage, representing exceptional growth for a company founded in 2022. The platform serves individual developers and teams across various programming languages and frameworks. Cursor's positioning focuses on developer productivity and reducing time spent on routine coding tasks. The company's trajectory reflects growing demand for AI-assisted development tools, as enterprises increasingly adopt AI to accelerate software development cycles. The substantial valuation and funding levels indicate significant investor confidence in the AI developer tools sector and Cursor's market execution, despite the competitive dynamics with established players. Cursor achieved a $29.3B valuation in under three years by positioning itself as a specialized AI code editor rather than a plugin, capturing significant developer adoption in a crowded market. Replit: Replit is a cloud-based integrated development environment (IDE) founded in 2016 that enables users to write, run, and deploy code directly in web browsers without local setup. The platform supports over 50 programming languages and provides collaborative coding features, allowing multiple users to work on projects simultaneously. Replit's core offering includes code execution infrastructure, a built-in package manager, and deployment capabilities for applications. The company targets individual developers, students, and enterprises seeking rapid development and prototyping workflows. Its AI-powered features include code completion and generation tools that assist developers during the coding process. The platform has gained significant adoption in educational settings for computer science instruction and among developers for rapid application building, a practice sometimes called "vibe coding." Replit competes with other cloud IDEs and development platforms such as GitHub Codespaces, Cursor, and traditional local development environments. The company has become one of the most well-capitalized AI coding platforms, with substantial funding from investors including Andreessen Horowitz, Coatue, and Y Combinator. Replit positions itself in the intersection of developer tools and AI-assisted coding, capitalizing on growing demand for accessible, browser-based development infrastructure. The company's growth trajectory reflects broader adoption of cloud-based development workflows and increased interest in AI-augmented coding assistants among its user base. Replit uniquely combines browser-based collaborative development with integrated AI coding assistance and one-click deployment, targeting both learners and professional developers.
Which company was founded first?
Replit got there first, launching in 2016 — that's 6 years of extra runway. Cursor didn't arrive until 2022. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Cursor has about 50 employees; Replit has about 100. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Cursor and Replit competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Cursor and Replit compete in AI Dev Tools, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Cursor edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 87, but Replit (79) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.

Who Should You Watch?

Cursor has a slight edge on paper, but Replit isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive