Skip to main content

Active.ai vs AlphaSense

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

AlphaSense is valued at $4B — more than 3x Active.ai's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

AlphaSense leads on 4 of 4 metrics

Active.ai

0 wins

-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

AlphaSense

4 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$4B
Total Funding
$11M
$1.4B
Awaira Score
50/100
82/100
Employees
50-200
1750
Founded
2016
2011
Stage
Series A
Series F
Active.aiAlphaSense
Active.ai logo
Active.ai

🇮🇳 India · Ravi Shankar

Series AAI FinanceEst. 2016

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$11M

Awaira Score50/100

50-200 employees

Full Active.ai Profile →
Winner
AlphaSense logo
AlphaSense

🇺🇸 United States · Jack Kokko

Series FAI FinanceEst. 2011

Valuation

$4B

Total Funding

$1.4B

Awaira Score82/100

1750 employees

Full AlphaSense Profile →
Market Context

As AI Finance players, Active.ai and AlphaSense target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Active.ai at Series A vs AlphaSense at Series F — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Active.ai and AlphaSense both operate in AI Finance, though their strategies diverge significantly. Active. AlphaSense is an AI-powered market intelligence platform founded in 2011 that helps financial professionals extract actionable insights from vast amounts of unstructured data.

Funding & Valuation

AlphaSense carries a disclosed valuation of $4B, while Active.ai remains privately valued. Capital raised tells a clear story: AlphaSense at $1.4B versus Active.ai at $11M — a $1.4B difference.

Growth Stage

Active.ai is the younger company by 5 years, having launched in 2016 compared to AlphaSense's 2011 founding. Stage-wise, Active.ai is classified as Series A and AlphaSense as Series F, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. On headcount, Active.ai reports 50-200 employees and AlphaSense reports 1750.

Geography & Outlook

Based in 🇮🇳 India and 🇺🇸 United States respectively, Active.ai and AlphaSense tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. A 32-point gap on the Awaira Score (AlphaSense: 82, Active.ai: 50) signals a clear difference in overall company strength. Active.ai, led by Ravi Shankar, and AlphaSense, led by Jack Kokko, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

Active.ai

Total Rounds2
Avg. Round Size$5.5M
Funding Span1.3 yrs

AlphaSense

Total Rounds6
Avg. Round SizeN/A
Funding Span9 yrs

Funding History

Active.ai has completed 2 funding rounds, while AlphaSense has gone through 6. Active.ai's most recent round was a Series A of $9.1M, compared to AlphaSense's Series F. Active.ai is at Series A while AlphaSense is at Series F — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

AlphaSense has the bigger team at roughly 1750 people — 35x the size of Active.ai's 50-200. AlphaSense has a 5-year head start, founded in 2011 vs Active.ai's 2016. Geographically, they're in different markets — Active.ai operates out of India and AlphaSense from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricActive.aiAlphaSense
💰Valuation
N/A
$4B
📈Total Funding
$11M
$1.4BWINS
📅Founded
2016WINS
2011
🚀Stage
Series A
Series F
👥Employees
50-200
1750
🌍Country
India
United States
🏷️Category
AI Finance
AI Finance
Awaira Score
50
82WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: AlphaSense has raised $1.4B more ($1.4B vs $11M)

📅

Market experience: AlphaSense has 5 years more (founded 2011 vs 2016)

🚀

Growth stage: Active.ai is at Series A vs AlphaSense at Series F

👥

Team size: Active.ai has 50-200 employees vs AlphaSense's 1750

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇳 Active.ai (India) vs 🇺🇸 AlphaSense (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Finance market segment

Awaira Score: AlphaSense scores 82/100 vs Active.ai's 50/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Active.ai logo

Choose Active.ai if…

  • India-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Active
AlphaSense logo

Choose AlphaSense if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 82/100 vs 50/100
  • More established by valuation ($4B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $1.4B
  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • AlphaSense is an AI-powered market intelligence platform founded in 2011 that helps financial professionals extract actionable insights from vast amounts of unstructured data

Funding History

Active.ai raised $11M across 2 rounds. AlphaSense raised $1.4B across 6 rounds.

Active.ai

Series A

Oct 2017

$9.1M

Seed

Jun 2016

$1.9M

AlphaSense

Series F

Jan 2021

Series E

Jan 2020

Series D

Jan 2018

Series C

Jan 2016

Series B

Jan 2014

Series A

Jan 2012

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Active.ai vs AlphaSense

Is Active.ai bigger than AlphaSense?
AlphaSense has a disclosed valuation of $4B, while Active.ai's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. AlphaSense employs 1750 people.
Which company raised more funding — Active.ai or AlphaSense?
AlphaSense has raised more in total funding at $1.4B, compared to Active.ai's $11M — a gap of $1.4B. Combined, the two companies have completed 8 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
AlphaSense leads with an Awaira Score of 82/100, while Active.ai sits at 50/100. That 32-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Active.ai vs AlphaSense?
Active.ai was founded by Ravi Shankar in 2016. AlphaSense was founded by Jack Kokko in 2011. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Active.ai do vs AlphaSense?
Active.ai: Active.ai builds conversational AI solutions specifically for retail banking and financial services, enabling banks to deploy intelligent virtual assistants for account inquiries, transaction analysis, loan servicing, and customer onboarding through mobile and messaging channels. The platform is designed to integrate with core banking systems and comply with financial services regulations across multiple jurisdictions.\n\nThe company raised approximately $11M in Series A funding and counts regional banks, cooperative financial institutions, and digital neobanks among its customers in India and Southeast Asia. Active.ai's banking-specific NLP models are trained on financial domain terminology, reducing hallucination risk in regulated customer-facing interactions.\n\nThe digital banking transformation in India, accelerated by UPI and the JAM trinity, has created strong demand for AI-assisted banking interfaces that can serve the next 300 million users entering the formal financial system. Active.ai's banking-native design positions it as a credible alternative to expensive custom development or generic chatbot platforms that require extensive financial domain customization. AlphaSense: AlphaSense is an AI-powered market intelligence platform founded in 2011 that helps financial professionals extract actionable insights from vast amounts of unstructured data. The company's core product uses natural language processing and machine learning to analyze earnings calls, news articles, research reports, regulatory filings, and other financial documents in real-time. AlphaSense enables investment professionals, including hedge funds, asset managers, and institutional investors, to identify market trends, competitive threats, and investment opportunities faster than traditional research methods. The platform processes millions of documents across multiple languages and industries, allowing users to conduct semantic searches rather than keyword-based queries. AlphaSense has secured $1.4 billion in total funding and achieved a $4.0 billion valuation as of its Series F funding round, reflecting strong investor confidence in the enterprise AI market. The company competes with traditional financial data providers and emerging AI research platforms by offering superior automation and speed. Its customer base includes major financial institutions and hedge funds globally. AlphaSense's growth trajectory has been accelerated by increasing demand for AI-driven research tools among institutional investors seeking competitive advantages in information analysis and decision-making speed. AlphaSense combines specialized NLP for financial data with institutional-grade performance at scale, addressing a specific pain point in professional investment research.
Which company was founded first?
AlphaSense got there first, launching in 2011 — that's 5 years of extra runway. Active.ai didn't arrive until 2016. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Active.ai has about 50-200 employees; AlphaSense has about 1750. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Active.ai and AlphaSense competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Active.ai and AlphaSense compete in AI Finance, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

AlphaSense has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 82 vs Active.ai's 50. The difference comes down to funding depth and strategic focus.

Who Should You Watch?

AlphaSense is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Active.ai has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive