Aidence vs Butterfly Network
In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
🇳🇱 Netherlands · Jeroen Vendrig
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$20M
1-50 employees
🇺🇸 United States · John Martin
Valuation
$1.5B
Total Funding
$700M
500-1000 employees
Analyst Summary
Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations
Both Aidence and Butterfly Network compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Aidence develops AI radiology software for lung cancer detection, building CE-marked and FDA-cleared deep learning algorithms that analyse CT scan images to identify and characterise pulmonary nodules requiring clinical follow-up. Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging.
Butterfly Network carries a known valuation of $1.5B, while Aidence's valuation has not been publicly disclosed. On the funding side, Butterfly Network has raised $700M in total — $680M more than Aidence's $20M.
Butterfly Network has 5 years more market experience, having been founded in 2011 compared to Aidence's 2016 founding. In terms of growth stage, Aidence is at Series B while Butterfly Network is at Public — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.
Aidence operates out of 🇳🇱 Netherlands while Butterfly Network is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Butterfly Network leads with a score of 85, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Aidence | Butterfly Network |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $1.5B |
📈Total Funding | $20M | $700MWINS |
📅Founded | 2016WINS | 2011 |
🚀Stage | Series B | Public |
👥Employees | 1-50 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | Netherlands | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Healthcare | AI Healthcare |
⭐Awaira Score | 45 | 85WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Butterfly Network has raised $680M more ($700M vs $20M)
Market experience: Butterfly Network has 5 years more (founded 2011 vs 2016)
Growth stage: Aidence is at Series B vs Butterfly Network at Public
Team size: Aidence has 1-50 employees vs Butterfly Network's 500-1000
Market base: 🇳🇱 Aidence (Netherlands) vs 🇺🇸 Butterfly Network (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment
Awaira Score: Butterfly Network scores 85/100 vs Aidence's 45/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Aidence if…
- ✓Netherlands-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Aidence develops AI radiology software for lung cancer detection, building CE-marked and FDA-cleared deep learning algorithms that analyse CT scan images to identify and characterise pulmonary nodules requiring clinical follow-up
Choose Butterfly Network if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 45/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($1.5B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $700M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging