Baraja vs Mobileye
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Mobileye is valued at $7.6B — more than 3x Baraja's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Baraja
0 wins
Mobileye
3 wins
Key Numbers
🇦🇺 Australia · Federico Collarte
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$32M
100-500 employees
🇮🇱 Israel · Amnon Shashua
Valuation
$7.6B
Total Funding
N/A
1000+ employees
Both companies compete in the AI Robotics space, though from different geographies — Baraja in Australia and Mobileye in Israel. Different stages (Series B vs Public) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
In the AI Robotics market, Baraja and Mobileye represent two distinct approaches. Baraja develops a novel lidar technology called Spectrum-Scan that steers laser beams using the natural dispersion of light through a prism rather than mechanical rotating mirrors or solid-state optical phased arrays, producing a solid-state lidar architecture that is more reliable and cost-effective than mechanical lidar alternatives for autonomous vehicle and robotics applications. Mobileye designs AI chips and software systems for advanced driver assistance and autonomous driving, producing the EyeQ system-on-chip series and associated computer vision software stack that is integrated into hundreds of millions of vehicles globally as the technical foundation for features including lane keeping, automatic emergency braking, and adaptive cruise control.
Funding & Valuation
Only Mobileye has a public valuation on record ($7.6B); Baraja's has not been disclosed. Baraja has raised $32M in disclosed funding.
Growth Stage
With a 17-year head start, Mobileye (founded 1999) has had considerably more time to mature than Baraja (2016). Baraja is at Series B while Mobileye stands at Public, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Headcount tells a story too: Baraja has 100-500 employees and Mobileye has 1000+.
Geography & Outlook
Based in 🇦🇺 Australia and 🇮🇱 Israel respectively, Baraja and Mobileye tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, Mobileye leads decisively at 92 compared to Baraja's 50. Under Federico Collarte and Amnon Shashua respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Baraja
Mobileye
Funding History
Baraja has completed 3 funding rounds, while Mobileye has gone through 5. Baraja's most recent round was a Series B of $22.4M, compared to Mobileye's IPO ($358.7M). Baraja is at Series B while Mobileye is at Public — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Mobileye has the bigger team at roughly 1000+ people — 10x the size of Baraja's 100-500. Mobileye has a 17-year head start, founded in 1999 vs Baraja's 2016. Geographically, they're in different markets — Baraja operates out of Australia and Mobileye from Israel.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Baraja | Mobileye |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $7.6B |
📈Total Funding | $32M | N/A |
📅Founded | 2016WINS | 1999 |
🚀Stage | Series B | Public |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 1000+ |
🌍Country | Australia | Israel |
🏷️Category | AI Robotics | AI Robotics |
⭐Awaira Score | 50 | 92WINS |
Key Differences
Market experience: Mobileye has 17 years more (founded 1999 vs 2016)
Growth stage: Baraja is at Series B vs Mobileye at Public
Team size: Baraja has 100-500 employees vs Mobileye's 1000+
Market base: 🇦🇺 Baraja (Australia) vs 🇮🇱 Mobileye (Israel)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Robotics market segment
Awaira Score: Mobileye scores 92/100 vs Baraja's 50/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Baraja if…
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $32M
- ✓Australia-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Baraja develops a novel lidar technology called Spectrum-Scan that steers laser beams using the natural dispersion of light through a prism rather than mechanical rotating mirrors or solid-state optical phased arrays, producing a solid-state lidar architecture that is more reliable and cost-effective than mechanical lidar alternatives for autonomous vehicle and robotics applications
Choose Mobileye if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 92/100 vs 50/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($7.6B)
- ✓More market experience — founded in 1999
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Mobileye designs AI chips and software systems for advanced driver assistance and autonomous driving, producing the EyeQ system-on-chip series and associated computer vision software stack that is integrated into hundreds of millions of vehicles globally as the technical foundation for features including lane keeping, automatic emergency braking, and adaptive cruise control
Funding History
Baraja raised $32M across 3 rounds. Mobileye raised N/A across 5 rounds.
Baraja
Series B
Feb 2019
Series A
Oct 2017
Seed
Jun 2016
Mobileye
IPO
Sep 2003
Series C
Jan 2002
Series B
Jul 2001
Series A
May 2000
Seed
Jan 1999
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Baraja vs Mobileye
Is Baraja bigger than Mobileye?▾
Which company raised more funding — Baraja or Mobileye?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Baraja vs Mobileye?▾
What does Baraja do vs Mobileye?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Baraja and Mobileye competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Mobileye has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 92 vs Baraja's 50. The difference comes down to market positioning and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Mobileye has a slight edge on paper, but Baraja isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.