Skip to main content

BioCatch vs Abnormal Security

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Abnormal Security is valued at $5.1B — more than 3x BioCatch's $1.3B.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Abnormal Security leads on 3 of 5 metrics

BioCatch

1 win

-Valuation
-Funding
=Awaira Score
-Team Size
+Experience

Abnormal Security

3 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
=Awaira Score
+Team Size
-Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$1.3B
$5.1B
Total Funding
$213M
$546M
Awaira Score
80/100
80/100
Employees
100-500
650
Founded
2011
2018
Stage
Series D
Series D
BioCatchAbnormal Security
Winner
BioCatch logo
BioCatch

🇮🇱 Israel · Avi Turgeman

Series DAI SecurityEst. 2011

Valuation

$1.3B

Total Funding

$213M

Awaira Score80/100

100-500 employees

Full BioCatch Profile →
Abnormal Security logo
Abnormal Security

🇺🇸 United States · Evan Reiser

Series DAI SecurityEst. 2018

Valuation

$5.1B

Total Funding

$546M

Awaira Score80/100

650 employees

Full Abnormal Security Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Security space, though from different geographies — BioCatch in Israel and Abnormal Security in United States. Both are at the Series D stage, meaning they face similar scaling challenges and investor expectations.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Within AI Security, BioCatch and Abnormal Security rank among the most closely watched rivals. BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. Abnormal Security is an AI-focused cybersecurity company founded in 2018 that specializes in email and cloud security.

Funding & Valuation

Valuation-wise, Abnormal Security holds the advantage at $5.1B, roughly 3.9 times BioCatch's $1.3B. Both have attracted significant capital — Abnormal Security with $546M and BioCatch with $213M.

Growth Stage

With a 7-year head start, BioCatch (founded 2011) has had considerably more time to mature than Abnormal Security (2018). At Series D, both face the same set of scaling challenges typical of that funding stage. Team sizes also differ: BioCatch employs 100-500 people versus Abnormal Security's 650.

Geography & Outlook

Geography separates them: BioCatch in 🇮🇱 Israel and Abnormal Security in 🇺🇸 United States, each benefiting from local ecosystems. Awaira's composite score rates them neck-and-neck: BioCatch at 80 and Abnormal Security at 80 out of 100. Under Avi Turgeman and Evan Reiser respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

BioCatch

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$40M

Abnormal Security

Total Rounds4
Avg. Round Size$135M
Funding Span4.4 yrs

Funding History

BioCatch has completed 1 funding round, while Abnormal Security has gone through 4. BioCatch's most recent round was a Series C of $40M, compared to Abnormal Security's Series D ($250M). Both are currently at the Series D stage.

Team & Scale

Abnormal Security has the bigger team at roughly 650 people — 7x the size of BioCatch's 100-500. BioCatch has a 7-year head start, founded in 2011 vs Abnormal Security's 2018. Geographically, they're in different markets — BioCatch operates out of Israel and Abnormal Security from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricBioCatchAbnormal Security
💰Valuation
$1.3B
$5.1BWINS
📈Total Funding
$213M
$546MWINS
📅Founded
2011
2018WINS
🚀Stage
Series D
Series D
👥Employees
100-500
650
🌍Country
Israel
United States
🏷️Category
AI Security
AI Security
Awaira Score
80
80

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Abnormal Security is valued 3.9x higher ($5.1B vs $1.3B)

📈

Funding gap: Abnormal Security has raised $333M more ($546M vs $213M)

📅

Market experience: BioCatch has 7 years more (founded 2011 vs 2018)

👥

Team size: BioCatch has 100-500 employees vs Abnormal Security's 650

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇱 BioCatch (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 Abnormal Security (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Security market segment

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

BioCatch logo

Choose BioCatch if…

Top Pick
  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions
Abnormal Security logo

Choose Abnormal Security if…

  • More established by valuation ($5.1B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $546M
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Abnormal Security is an AI-focused cybersecurity company founded in 2018 that specializes in email and cloud security

Funding History

BioCatch raised $213M across 1 round. Abnormal Security raised $546M across 4 rounds.

BioCatch

Series C

Mar 2020

Lead: Bain Capital Ventures

$40M

Abnormal Security

Series D

Aug 2024

Lead: ICONIQ Growth

$250M

Series C

May 2022

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$210M

Series B

Nov 2020

$50M

Series A

Mar 2020

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$30M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to BioCatch

Bain Capital VenturesAmerican Express Ventures

Unique to Abnormal Security

Sequoia CapitalAccelIconiq CapitalSalesforce VenturesICONIQ GrowthMenlo Ventures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — BioCatch vs Abnormal Security

Is BioCatch bigger than Abnormal Security?
By valuation, Abnormal Security is the larger company at $5.1B versus $1.3B — a 3.9x difference. Size can also be measured by team: BioCatch employs 100-500 people while Abnormal Security has 650 employees.
Which company raised more funding — BioCatch or Abnormal Security?
Abnormal Security has raised more in total funding at $546M, compared to BioCatch's $213M — a gap of $333M. Combined, the two companies have completed 5 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
It's a dead heat — both BioCatch and Abnormal Security sit at 80/100 on the Awaira Score. That score factors in valuation, funding, stage, headcount, and category.
Who founded BioCatch vs Abnormal Security?
BioCatch was founded by Avi Turgeman in 2011. Abnormal Security was founded by Evan Reiser in 2018. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does BioCatch do vs Abnormal Security?
BioCatch: BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. The Tel Aviv company processes behavioural signals from hundreds of millions of user sessions monthly, building individual profiles that flag deviations indicating fraud.\n\nThe company raised approximately $213 million in venture funding including a Series D led by Tiger Global, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. BioCatch counts over 30 tier-one banks globally among its clients including American Express, NatWest, and Lloyds Banking Group, with deployments protecting online banking and mobile banking sessions from fraud that bypasses traditional authentication controls. The platform is particularly effective against malware-assisted fraud and social engineering scams where the genuine account holder is unknowingly manipulated.\n\nBioCatch competes in the behavioural biometrics and fraud intelligence market alongside ThreatMetrix (now LexisNexis Risk Solutions), Sift, and Sardine, as well as traditional fraud management platforms from FICO and SAS. Its differentiation is the depth of its behavioural feature engineering from passive interaction signals that do not require active user participation, creating a fraud layer that operates continuously without adding friction to legitimate user journeys. The growing prevalence of authorised push payment fraud and social engineering attacks in European banking has expanded the relevant use case for BioCatch beyond traditional account takeover detection. Abnormal Security: Abnormal Security is an AI-focused cybersecurity company founded in 2018 that specializes in email and cloud security. The company develops AI-powered threat detection systems designed to identify and prevent advanced email attacks, including phishing, business email compromise (BEC), and account takeover attempts. Its core platform uses behavioral AI and machine learning to analyze communication patterns and detect anomalies that traditional security tools miss. The company's technology focuses on cloud email environments, particularly Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, where it monitors user behavior, message content, and sender patterns in real-time. Abnormal Security has achieved a valuation of $5.1 billion following Series D funding, with total funding of $546 million. The company operates in a competitive landscape alongside established vendors like Proofpoint, Mimecast, and Cisco, as well as emerging AI security startups. Its positioning emphasizes reducing security alert fatigue through AI accuracy while preventing targeted attacks that evade traditional signature-based detection. The company has secured enterprise customers across various industries, though specific customer names are not widely disclosed. Growth trajectory indicates strong market demand for AI-driven email security solutions as organizations face increasingly sophisticated social engineering attacks. Abnormal Security represents the broader shift toward behavioral AI in enterprise security infrastructure. Abnormal Security applies behavioral AI specifically to email security, addressing a historically high-friction attack vector that traditional tools struggle to defend against effectively.
Which company was founded first?
BioCatch got there first, launching in 2011 — that's 7 years of extra runway. Abnormal Security didn't arrive until 2018. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
BioCatch has about 100-500 employees; Abnormal Security has about 650. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are BioCatch and Abnormal Security competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both BioCatch and Abnormal Security compete in AI Security, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

It's close. Both BioCatch and Abnormal Security are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.

Who Should You Watch?

This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive