BioCatch vs Abnormal Security
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Abnormal Security is valued at $5.1B — more than 3x BioCatch's $1.3B.
Head-to-Head Verdict
BioCatch
1 win
Abnormal Security
3 wins
Key Numbers
🇮🇱 Israel · Avi Turgeman
Valuation
$1.3B
Total Funding
$213M
100-500 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Evan Reiser
Valuation
$5.1B
Total Funding
$546M
650 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Security space, though from different geographies — BioCatch in Israel and Abnormal Security in United States. Both are at the Series D stage, meaning they face similar scaling challenges and investor expectations.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Within AI Security, BioCatch and Abnormal Security rank among the most closely watched rivals. BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. Abnormal Security is an AI-focused cybersecurity company founded in 2018 that specializes in email and cloud security.
Funding & Valuation
Valuation-wise, Abnormal Security holds the advantage at $5.1B, roughly 3.9 times BioCatch's $1.3B. Both have attracted significant capital — Abnormal Security with $546M and BioCatch with $213M.
Growth Stage
With a 7-year head start, BioCatch (founded 2011) has had considerably more time to mature than Abnormal Security (2018). At Series D, both face the same set of scaling challenges typical of that funding stage. Team sizes also differ: BioCatch employs 100-500 people versus Abnormal Security's 650.
Geography & Outlook
Geography separates them: BioCatch in 🇮🇱 Israel and Abnormal Security in 🇺🇸 United States, each benefiting from local ecosystems. Awaira's composite score rates them neck-and-neck: BioCatch at 80 and Abnormal Security at 80 out of 100. Under Avi Turgeman and Evan Reiser respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
BioCatch
Abnormal Security
Funding History
BioCatch has completed 1 funding round, while Abnormal Security has gone through 4. BioCatch's most recent round was a Series C of $40M, compared to Abnormal Security's Series D ($250M). Both are currently at the Series D stage.
Team & Scale
Abnormal Security has the bigger team at roughly 650 people — 7x the size of BioCatch's 100-500. BioCatch has a 7-year head start, founded in 2011 vs Abnormal Security's 2018. Geographically, they're in different markets — BioCatch operates out of Israel and Abnormal Security from United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | BioCatch | Abnormal Security |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $1.3B | $5.1BWINS |
📈Total Funding | $213M | $546MWINS |
📅Founded | 2011 | 2018WINS |
🚀Stage | Series D | Series D |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 650 |
🌍Country | Israel | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Security | AI Security |
⭐Awaira Score | 80 | 80 |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Abnormal Security is valued 3.9x higher ($5.1B vs $1.3B)
Funding gap: Abnormal Security has raised $333M more ($546M vs $213M)
Market experience: BioCatch has 7 years more (founded 2011 vs 2018)
Team size: BioCatch has 100-500 employees vs Abnormal Security's 650
Market base: 🇮🇱 BioCatch (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 Abnormal Security (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Security market segment
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose BioCatch if…
Top Pick- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions
Choose Abnormal Security if…
- ✓More established by valuation ($5.1B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $546M
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Abnormal Security is an AI-focused cybersecurity company founded in 2018 that specializes in email and cloud security
Funding History
BioCatch raised $213M across 1 round. Abnormal Security raised $546M across 4 rounds.
BioCatch
Series C
Mar 2020
Lead: Bain Capital Ventures
Abnormal Security
Series D
Aug 2024
Lead: ICONIQ Growth
Series C
May 2022
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series B
Nov 2020
Series A
Mar 2020
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to BioCatch
Unique to Abnormal Security
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — BioCatch vs Abnormal Security
Is BioCatch bigger than Abnormal Security?▾
Which company raised more funding — BioCatch or Abnormal Security?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded BioCatch vs Abnormal Security?▾
What does BioCatch do vs Abnormal Security?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are BioCatch and Abnormal Security competitors?▾
Bottom Line
It's close. Both BioCatch and Abnormal Security are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.
Who Should You Watch?
This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.