Overall Winner: CrowdStrike·92/ 100

BioCatch vs CrowdStrike

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

B
BioCatch

🇮🇱 Israel · Avi Turgeman

Series DAI SecurityEst. 2011

Valuation

$1B

Total Funding

$213M

80
Awaira Score80/100

100-500 employees

Full BioCatch Profile →
Winner
C
CrowdStrike

🇺🇸 United States · George Kurtz

PublicAI SecurityEst. 2011

Valuation

$107B

Total Funding

N/A

92
Awaira Score92/100

9000 employees

Full CrowdStrike Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both BioCatch and CrowdStrike compete directly in the AI Security space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. CrowdStrike is a publicly traded cybersecurity company founded in 2011 that specializes in cloud-native endpoint protection and threat intelligence.

CrowdStrike carries a valuation of $107B, which is 107x higher than BioCatch's $1B. BioCatch has raised $213M in disclosed funding.

Both companies were founded in 2011, giving them the same market tenure. In terms of growth stage, BioCatch is at Series D while CrowdStrike is at Public — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

BioCatch operates out of 🇮🇱 Israel while CrowdStrike is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, CrowdStrike leads with a score of 92, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricBioCatchCrowdStrike
💰Valuation
$1B
$107BWINS
📈Total Funding
$213M
N/A
📅Founded
2011
2011
🚀Stage
Series D
Public
👥Employees
100-500
9000
🌍Country
Israel
United States
🏷️Category
AI Security
AI Security
Awaira Score
80
92WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: CrowdStrike is valued 107x higher ($107B vs $1B)

🚀

Growth stage: BioCatch is at Series D vs CrowdStrike at Public

👥

Team size: BioCatch has 100-500 employees vs CrowdStrike's 9000

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇱 BioCatch (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 CrowdStrike (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Security market segment

Awaira Score: CrowdStrike scores 92/100 vs BioCatch's 80/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

B

Choose BioCatch if…

  • Stronger investor backing — raised $213M
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions
C

Choose CrowdStrike if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 92/100 vs 80/100
  • More established by valuation ($107B)
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • CrowdStrike is a publicly traded cybersecurity company founded in 2011 that specializes in cloud-native endpoint protection and threat intelligence

Funding History

BioCatch raised $213M across 0 rounds. CrowdStrike raised N/A across 5 rounds.

BioCatch

No public funding data available.

CrowdStrike

IPO

Jun 2019

Series D

Jan 2016

Lead: Sapphire Ventures

$100M

Series C

Jan 2014

Lead: Google Ventures

$40M

Series B

Jan 2013

Lead: Accel Partners

$20M

Series A

Jan 2012

Lead: Warburg Pincus

$10M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to CrowdStrike

Sapphire VenturesAccel PartnersGoogle VenturesWarburg Pincus

Users Also Compare

FAQ — BioCatch vs CrowdStrike

Is BioCatch bigger than CrowdStrike?
By valuation, CrowdStrike is the larger company at $107B versus $1B — a 107x difference. Size can also be measured by team: BioCatch employs 100-500 people while CrowdStrike has 9000 employees.
Which company raised more funding — BioCatch or CrowdStrike?
BioCatch has raised $213M in disclosed funding across 0 known rounds. CrowdStrike's funding history is not publicly available.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
CrowdStrike holds the higher Awaira Score at 92/100, compared to BioCatch's 80/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 12-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded BioCatch vs CrowdStrike?
BioCatch was founded by Avi Turgeman in 2011. CrowdStrike was founded by George Kurtz in 2011. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does BioCatch do vs CrowdStrike?
BioCatch: BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. The Tel Aviv company processes behavioural signals from hundreds of millions of user sessions monthly, building individual profiles that flag deviations indicating fraud.\n\nThe company raised approximately $213 million in venture funding including a Series D led by Tiger Global, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. BioCatch counts over 30 tier-one banks globally among its clients including American Express, NatWest, and Lloyds Banking Group, with deployments protecting online banking and mobile banking sessions from fraud that bypasses traditional authentication controls. The platform is particularly effective against malware-assisted fraud and social engineering scams where the genuine account holder is unknowingly manipulated.\n\nBioCatch competes in the behavioural biometrics and fraud intelligence market alongside ThreatMetrix (now LexisNexis Risk Solutions), Sift, and Sardine, as well as traditional fraud management platforms from FICO and SAS. Its differentiation is the depth of its behavioural feature engineering from passive interaction signals that do not require active user participation, creating a fraud layer that operates continuously without adding friction to legitimate user journeys. The growing prevalence of authorised push payment fraud and social engineering attacks in European banking has expanded the relevant use case for BioCatch beyond traditional account takeover detection. CrowdStrike: CrowdStrike is a publicly traded cybersecurity company founded in 2011 that specializes in cloud-native endpoint protection and threat intelligence. The company's core platform, the Falcon suite, uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to detect, prevent, and respond to cyber threats across endpoints, cloud workloads, and identity systems. CrowdStrike's approach centers on behavioral analysis and AI-driven threat hunting rather than signature-based detection alone. The company serves enterprise customers across financial services, healthcare, technology, and government sectors. Its platform integrates endpoint detection and response (EDR), managed threat hunting, vulnerability management, and security analytics. CrowdStrike has maintained significant market position through continuous product expansion and acquisitions that enhance its capabilities. With a valuation of $107.0 billion, CrowdStrike is among the most valuable cybersecurity firms globally. The company competes directly with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Palo Alto Networks, SentinelOne, and other endpoint security providers. Its growth trajectory has been supported by increasing enterprise adoption of cloud-based security solutions and the growing demand for AI-enhanced threat detection. CrowdStrike generates revenue through subscription-based licensing models, with customers deploying the platform across thousands of endpoints. The company has achieved profitability and continues expanding internationally while investing in artificial intelligence capabilities for predictive threat intelligence. CrowdStrike pioneered cloud-native endpoint protection at scale, differentiating itself through AI-driven behavioral analysis rather than legacy signature-based detection methods.
Which company was founded first?
Both BioCatch and CrowdStrike were founded in the same year — 2011. Despite sharing a founding year, they may have launched at different times within that year, which can matter in fast-moving AI markets.
Which company has more employees?
BioCatch has approximately 100-500 employees, while CrowdStrike has approximately 9000. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are BioCatch and CrowdStrike competitors?
Yes, BioCatch and CrowdStrike are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Security space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.