BioCatch vs CrowdStrike
In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
🇮🇱 Israel · Avi Turgeman
Valuation
$1B
Total Funding
$213M
100-500 employees
🇺🇸 United States · George Kurtz
Valuation
$107B
Total Funding
N/A
9000 employees
Analyst Summary
Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations
Both BioCatch and CrowdStrike compete directly in the AI Security space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. CrowdStrike is a publicly traded cybersecurity company founded in 2011 that specializes in cloud-native endpoint protection and threat intelligence.
CrowdStrike carries a valuation of $107B, which is 107x higher than BioCatch's $1B. BioCatch has raised $213M in disclosed funding.
Both companies were founded in 2011, giving them the same market tenure. In terms of growth stage, BioCatch is at Series D while CrowdStrike is at Public — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.
BioCatch operates out of 🇮🇱 Israel while CrowdStrike is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, CrowdStrike leads with a score of 92, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | BioCatch | CrowdStrike |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $1B | $107BWINS |
📈Total Funding | $213M | N/A |
📅Founded | 2011 | 2011 |
🚀Stage | Series D | Public |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 9000 |
🌍Country | Israel | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Security | AI Security |
⭐Awaira Score | 80 | 92WINS |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: CrowdStrike is valued 107x higher ($107B vs $1B)
Growth stage: BioCatch is at Series D vs CrowdStrike at Public
Team size: BioCatch has 100-500 employees vs CrowdStrike's 9000
Market base: 🇮🇱 BioCatch (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 CrowdStrike (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Security market segment
Awaira Score: CrowdStrike scores 92/100 vs BioCatch's 80/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose BioCatch if…
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $213M
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions
Choose CrowdStrike if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 92/100 vs 80/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($107B)
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓CrowdStrike is a publicly traded cybersecurity company founded in 2011 that specializes in cloud-native endpoint protection and threat intelligence
Funding History
BioCatch raised $213M across 0 rounds. CrowdStrike raised N/A across 5 rounds.
BioCatch
No public funding data available.
CrowdStrike
IPO
Jun 2019
Series D
Jan 2016
Lead: Sapphire Ventures
Series C
Jan 2014
Lead: Google Ventures
Series B
Jan 2013
Lead: Accel Partners
Series A
Jan 2012
Lead: Warburg Pincus
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to CrowdStrike