Skip to main content

BioCatch vs CrowdStrike

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

CrowdStrike is valued at $107B — more than 3x BioCatch's $1.3B.

Head-to-Head Verdict

CrowdStrike leads on 3 of 4 metrics

BioCatch

0 wins

-Valuation
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
=Experience

CrowdStrike

3 wins

+Valuation
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
=Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$1.3B
$107B
Total Funding
$213M
N/A
Awaira Score
80/100
92/100
Employees
100-500
9000
Founded
2011
2011
Stage
Series D
Public
BioCatchCrowdStrike
BioCatch logo
BioCatch

🇮🇱 Israel · Avi Turgeman

Series DAI SecurityEst. 2011

Valuation

$1.3B

Total Funding

$213M

Awaira Score80/100

100-500 employees

Full BioCatch Profile →
Winner
CrowdStrike logo
CrowdStrike

🇺🇸 United States · George Kurtz

PublicAI SecurityEst. 2011

Valuation

$107B

Total Funding

N/A

Awaira Score92/100

9000 employees

Full CrowdStrike Profile →
Market Context

As AI Security players, BioCatch and CrowdStrike target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — BioCatch at Series D vs CrowdStrike at Public — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

AI Security remains a contested market, with BioCatch and CrowdStrike among its most prominent entrants. BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. CrowdStrike is a publicly traded cybersecurity company founded in 2011 that specializes in cloud-native endpoint protection and threat intelligence.

Funding & Valuation

A 82.3x valuation gap separates these companies — CrowdStrike at $107B and BioCatch at $1.3B. BioCatch has raised $213M in disclosed funding.

Growth Stage

BioCatch and CrowdStrike share a 2011 founding year, meaning neither has a seniority advantage. Growth stages differ: BioCatch (Series D) versus CrowdStrike (Public), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Team sizes also differ: BioCatch employs 100-500 people versus CrowdStrike's 9000.

Geography & Outlook

BioCatch operates out of 🇮🇱 Israel while CrowdStrike is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. The Awaira Score gives CrowdStrike (92) a notable lead over BioCatch (80). BioCatch, led by Avi Turgeman, and CrowdStrike, led by George Kurtz, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

BioCatch

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$40M

CrowdStrike

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$46.5M
Funding Span7.4 yrs

Funding History

BioCatch has completed 1 funding round, while CrowdStrike has gone through 5. BioCatch's most recent round was a Series C of $40M, compared to CrowdStrike's IPO. BioCatch is at Series D while CrowdStrike is at Public — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

CrowdStrike has the bigger team at roughly 9000 people — 90x the size of BioCatch's 100-500. Both companies were founded in 2011. Geographically, they're in different markets — BioCatch operates out of Israel and CrowdStrike from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricBioCatchCrowdStrike
💰Valuation
$1.3B
$107BWINS
📈Total Funding
$213M
N/A
📅Founded
2011
2011
🚀Stage
Series D
Public
👥Employees
100-500
9000
🌍Country
Israel
United States
🏷️Category
AI Security
AI Security
Awaira Score
80
92WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: CrowdStrike is valued 82.3x higher ($107B vs $1.3B)

🚀

Growth stage: BioCatch is at Series D vs CrowdStrike at Public

👥

Team size: BioCatch has 100-500 employees vs CrowdStrike's 9000

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇱 BioCatch (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 CrowdStrike (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Security market segment

Awaira Score: CrowdStrike scores 92/100 vs BioCatch's 80/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

BioCatch logo

Choose BioCatch if…

  • Stronger investor backing — raised $213M
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions
CrowdStrike logo

Choose CrowdStrike if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 92/100 vs 80/100
  • More established by valuation ($107B)
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • CrowdStrike is a publicly traded cybersecurity company founded in 2011 that specializes in cloud-native endpoint protection and threat intelligence

Funding History

BioCatch raised $213M across 1 round. CrowdStrike raised N/A across 5 rounds.

BioCatch

Series C

Mar 2020

Lead: Bain Capital Ventures

$40M

CrowdStrike

IPO

Jun 2019

Series D

May 2017

Lead: Sapphire Ventures

$100M

Series C

Jan 2014

Lead: Google Ventures

$40M

Series B

Jan 2013

Lead: Accel

$20M

Series A

Jan 2012

Lead: Warburg Pincus

$26M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to BioCatch

Bain Capital VenturesAmerican Express Ventures

Unique to CrowdStrike

Sapphire VenturesAccelGoogle VenturesWarburg Pincus

Users Also Compare

FAQ — BioCatch vs CrowdStrike

Is BioCatch bigger than CrowdStrike?
By valuation, CrowdStrike is the larger company at $107B versus $1.3B — a 82.3x difference. Size can also be measured by team: BioCatch employs 100-500 people while CrowdStrike has 9000 employees.
Which company raised more funding — BioCatch or CrowdStrike?
BioCatch has raised $213M in disclosed funding across 1 known round. CrowdStrike's funding history is not publicly available.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
CrowdStrike leads with an Awaira Score of 92/100, while BioCatch sits at 80/100. That 12-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded BioCatch vs CrowdStrike?
BioCatch was founded by Avi Turgeman in 2011. CrowdStrike was founded by George Kurtz in 2011. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does BioCatch do vs CrowdStrike?
BioCatch: BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. The Tel Aviv company processes behavioural signals from hundreds of millions of user sessions monthly, building individual profiles that flag deviations indicating fraud.\n\nThe company raised approximately $213 million in venture funding including a Series D led by Tiger Global, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. BioCatch counts over 30 tier-one banks globally among its clients including American Express, NatWest, and Lloyds Banking Group, with deployments protecting online banking and mobile banking sessions from fraud that bypasses traditional authentication controls. The platform is particularly effective against malware-assisted fraud and social engineering scams where the genuine account holder is unknowingly manipulated.\n\nBioCatch competes in the behavioural biometrics and fraud intelligence market alongside ThreatMetrix (now LexisNexis Risk Solutions), Sift, and Sardine, as well as traditional fraud management platforms from FICO and SAS. Its differentiation is the depth of its behavioural feature engineering from passive interaction signals that do not require active user participation, creating a fraud layer that operates continuously without adding friction to legitimate user journeys. The growing prevalence of authorised push payment fraud and social engineering attacks in European banking has expanded the relevant use case for BioCatch beyond traditional account takeover detection. CrowdStrike: CrowdStrike is a publicly traded cybersecurity company founded in 2011 that specializes in cloud-native endpoint protection and threat intelligence. The company's core platform, the Falcon suite, uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to detect, prevent, and respond to cyber threats across endpoints, cloud workloads, and identity systems. CrowdStrike's approach centers on behavioral analysis and AI-driven threat hunting rather than signature-based detection alone. The company serves enterprise customers across financial services, healthcare, technology, and government sectors. Its platform integrates endpoint detection and response (EDR), managed threat hunting, vulnerability management, and security analytics. CrowdStrike has maintained significant market position through continuous product expansion and acquisitions that enhance its capabilities. With a valuation of $107.0 billion, CrowdStrike is among the most valuable cybersecurity firms globally. The company competes directly with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Palo Alto Networks, SentinelOne, and other endpoint security providers. Its growth trajectory has been supported by increasing enterprise adoption of cloud-based security solutions and the growing demand for AI-enhanced threat detection. CrowdStrike generates revenue through subscription-based licensing models, with customers deploying the platform across thousands of endpoints. The company has achieved profitability and continues expanding internationally while investing in artificial intelligence capabilities for predictive threat intelligence. CrowdStrike pioneered cloud-native endpoint protection at scale, differentiating itself through AI-driven behavioral analysis rather than legacy signature-based detection methods.
Which company was founded first?
Both BioCatch and CrowdStrike launched in 2011. Same year, but even a few months' head start matters in AI — early movers lock in data, talent, and customer relationships fast.
Which company has more employees?
BioCatch has about 100-500 employees; CrowdStrike has about 9000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are BioCatch and CrowdStrike competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both BioCatch and CrowdStrike compete in AI Security, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

CrowdStrike edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 92, but BioCatch (80) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.

Who Should You Watch?

CrowdStrike has a slight edge on paper, but BioCatch isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive