Skip to main content

BioCatch vs Darktrace

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Darktrace is valued at $5.3B — more than 3x BioCatch's $1.3B.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Darktrace leads on 4 of 5 metrics

BioCatch

1 win

-Valuation
-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
+Experience

Darktrace

4 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
-Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$1.3B
$5.3B
Total Funding
$213M
$230M
Awaira Score
80/100
85/100
Employees
100-500
1000-5000
Founded
2011
2013
Stage
Series D
Acquired
BioCatchDarktrace
BioCatch logo
BioCatch

🇮🇱 Israel · Avi Turgeman

Series DAI SecurityEst. 2011

Valuation

$1.3B

Total Funding

$213M

Awaira Score80/100

100-500 employees

Full BioCatch Profile →
Winner
Darktrace logo
Darktrace

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Poppy Gustafsson

AcquiredAI SecurityEst. 2013

Valuation

$5.3B

Total Funding

$230M

Awaira Score85/100

1000-5000 employees

Full Darktrace Profile →
Market Context

As AI Security players, BioCatch and Darktrace target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — BioCatch at Series D vs Darktrace at Acquired — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

BioCatch and Darktrace both operate in AI Security, though their strategies diverge significantly. BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. Darktrace is an AI cybersecurity company that applies unsupervised machine learning to detect and respond to cyber threats inside enterprise networks, email systems, cloud environments, and operational technology.

Funding & Valuation

Darktrace carries a valuation of $5.3B, which is 4.1x higher than BioCatch's $1.3B. Funding totals are closer: Darktrace at $230M compared to BioCatch's $213M.

Growth Stage

Established in 2011, BioCatch has a modest 2-year head start over Darktrace (2013). BioCatch is at Series D while Darktrace stands at Acquired, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Team sizes also differ: BioCatch employs 100-500 people versus Darktrace's 1000-5000.

Geography & Outlook

Geography separates them: BioCatch in 🇮🇱 Israel and Darktrace in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom, each benefiting from local ecosystems. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, the gap is minimal — BioCatch scores 80 and Darktrace scores 85. BioCatch, led by Avi Turgeman, and Darktrace, led by Poppy Gustafsson, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

BioCatch

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$40M

Darktrace

Total Rounds2
Avg. Round Size$62.5M
Funding Span1.2 yrs

Funding History

BioCatch has completed 1 funding round, while Darktrace has gone through 2. BioCatch's most recent round was a Series C of $40M, compared to Darktrace's Series E ($50M). BioCatch is at Series D while Darktrace is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Darktrace has the bigger team at roughly 1000-5000 people — 10x the size of BioCatch's 100-500. They're close in age — BioCatch started in 2011 and Darktrace in 2013. Geographically, they're in different markets — BioCatch operates out of Israel and Darktrace from United Kingdom.

Metrics Comparison

MetricBioCatchDarktrace
💰Valuation
$1.3B
$5.3BWINS
📈Total Funding
$213M
$230MWINS
📅Founded
2011
2013WINS
🚀Stage
Series D
Acquired
👥Employees
100-500
1000-5000
🌍Country
Israel
United Kingdom
🏷️Category
AI Security
AI Security
Awaira Score
80
85WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Darktrace is valued 4.1x higher ($5.3B vs $1.3B)

📈

Funding gap: Darktrace has raised $17M more ($230M vs $213M)

📅

Market experience: BioCatch has 2 years more (founded 2011 vs 2013)

🚀

Growth stage: BioCatch is at Series D vs Darktrace at Acquired

👥

Team size: BioCatch has 100-500 employees vs Darktrace's 1000-5000

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇱 BioCatch (Israel) vs 🇬🇧 Darktrace (United Kingdom)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Security market segment

Awaira Score: Darktrace scores 85/100 vs BioCatch's 80/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

BioCatch logo

Choose BioCatch if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions
Darktrace logo

Choose Darktrace if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 80/100
  • More established by valuation ($5.3B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $230M
  • United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Darktrace is an AI cybersecurity company that applies unsupervised machine learning to detect and respond to cyber threats inside enterprise networks, email systems, cloud environments, and operational technology

Funding History

BioCatch raised $213M across 1 round. Darktrace raised $230M across 2 rounds.

BioCatch

Series C

Mar 2020

Lead: Bain Capital Ventures

$40M

Darktrace

Series E

Sep 2018

Lead: Vitruvian Partners

$50M

Series D

Jul 2017

Lead: Insight Partners

$75M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to BioCatch

Bain Capital VenturesAmerican Express Ventures

Unique to Darktrace

Vitruvian PartnersInsight PartnersTenEleven Ventures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — BioCatch vs Darktrace

Is BioCatch bigger than Darktrace?
By valuation, Darktrace is the larger company at $5.3B versus $1.3B — a 4.1x difference. Size can also be measured by team: BioCatch employs 100-500 people while Darktrace has 1000-5000 employees.
Which company raised more funding — BioCatch or Darktrace?
Darktrace has raised more in total funding at $230M, compared to BioCatch's $213M — a gap of $17M. Combined, the two companies have completed 3 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Darktrace leads with an Awaira Score of 85/100, while BioCatch sits at 80/100. That 5-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded BioCatch vs Darktrace?
BioCatch was founded by Avi Turgeman in 2011. Darktrace was founded by Poppy Gustafsson in 2013. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does BioCatch do vs Darktrace?
BioCatch: BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. The Tel Aviv company processes behavioural signals from hundreds of millions of user sessions monthly, building individual profiles that flag deviations indicating fraud.\n\nThe company raised approximately $213 million in venture funding including a Series D led by Tiger Global, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. BioCatch counts over 30 tier-one banks globally among its clients including American Express, NatWest, and Lloyds Banking Group, with deployments protecting online banking and mobile banking sessions from fraud that bypasses traditional authentication controls. The platform is particularly effective against malware-assisted fraud and social engineering scams where the genuine account holder is unknowingly manipulated.\n\nBioCatch competes in the behavioural biometrics and fraud intelligence market alongside ThreatMetrix (now LexisNexis Risk Solutions), Sift, and Sardine, as well as traditional fraud management platforms from FICO and SAS. Its differentiation is the depth of its behavioural feature engineering from passive interaction signals that do not require active user participation, creating a fraud layer that operates continuously without adding friction to legitimate user journeys. The growing prevalence of authorised push payment fraud and social engineering attacks in European banking has expanded the relevant use case for BioCatch beyond traditional account takeover detection. Darktrace: Darktrace is an AI cybersecurity company that applies unsupervised machine learning to detect and respond to cyber threats inside enterprise networks, email systems, cloud environments, and operational technology. The Cambridge-based company pioneered the concept of the enterprise immune system, training AI models on each organisation normal network behaviour to identify anomalies that indicate intrusion, insider threat, or ransomware activity in real time without requiring predefined threat signatures.\n\nThe company went public on the London Stock Exchange in 2021, raising approximately $230 million in its IPO after backing from Invoke Capital, Vitruvian Partners, and KKR. Darktrace reports over 9,000 enterprise customers across more than 100 countries, including significant deployments in financial services, healthcare, and critical infrastructure. The company has expanded from network detection to autonomous response capabilities through its Antigena product, which can quarantine infected systems and neutralise threats without human intervention.\n\nDarktrace competes in the AI-native cybersecurity market against CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, and Microsoft Defender, as well as against SIEM vendors including Splunk and IBM QRadar. The company valuation and public market performance have been volatile, reflecting broader uncertainty around AI cybersecurity spending cycles and questions about autonomous response effectiveness in complex enterprise environments. Its AI self-learning approach, applied consistently across network, email, cloud, and OT security, remains a distinctive architecture compared to detection-rule-based competitors, and the Poppy Gustafsson leadership profile has made Darktrace a flagship case study for UK technology entrepreneurship.
Which company was founded first?
BioCatch got there first, launching in 2011 — that's 2 years of extra runway. Darktrace didn't arrive until 2013. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
BioCatch has about 100-500 employees; Darktrace has about 1000-5000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are BioCatch and Darktrace competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both BioCatch and Darktrace compete in AI Security, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

It's close. Both BioCatch and Darktrace are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.

Who Should You Watch?

This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive