BioCatch vs Darktrace
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Darktrace is valued at $5.3B — more than 3x BioCatch's $1.3B.
Head-to-Head Verdict
BioCatch
1 win
Darktrace
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇮🇱 Israel · Avi Turgeman
Valuation
$1.3B
Total Funding
$213M
100-500 employees
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Poppy Gustafsson
Valuation
$5.3B
Total Funding
$230M
1000-5000 employees
As AI Security players, BioCatch and Darktrace target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — BioCatch at Series D vs Darktrace at Acquired — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
BioCatch and Darktrace both operate in AI Security, though their strategies diverge significantly. BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. Darktrace is an AI cybersecurity company that applies unsupervised machine learning to detect and respond to cyber threats inside enterprise networks, email systems, cloud environments, and operational technology.
Funding & Valuation
Darktrace carries a valuation of $5.3B, which is 4.1x higher than BioCatch's $1.3B. Funding totals are closer: Darktrace at $230M compared to BioCatch's $213M.
Growth Stage
Established in 2011, BioCatch has a modest 2-year head start over Darktrace (2013). BioCatch is at Series D while Darktrace stands at Acquired, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Team sizes also differ: BioCatch employs 100-500 people versus Darktrace's 1000-5000.
Geography & Outlook
Geography separates them: BioCatch in 🇮🇱 Israel and Darktrace in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom, each benefiting from local ecosystems. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, the gap is minimal — BioCatch scores 80 and Darktrace scores 85. BioCatch, led by Avi Turgeman, and Darktrace, led by Poppy Gustafsson, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.
Funding Velocity
BioCatch
Darktrace
Funding History
BioCatch has completed 1 funding round, while Darktrace has gone through 2. BioCatch's most recent round was a Series C of $40M, compared to Darktrace's Series E ($50M). BioCatch is at Series D while Darktrace is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Darktrace has the bigger team at roughly 1000-5000 people — 10x the size of BioCatch's 100-500. They're close in age — BioCatch started in 2011 and Darktrace in 2013. Geographically, they're in different markets — BioCatch operates out of Israel and Darktrace from United Kingdom.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | BioCatch | Darktrace |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $1.3B | $5.3BWINS |
📈Total Funding | $213M | $230MWINS |
📅Founded | 2011 | 2013WINS |
🚀Stage | Series D | Acquired |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 1000-5000 |
🌍Country | Israel | United Kingdom |
🏷️Category | AI Security | AI Security |
⭐Awaira Score | 80 | 85WINS |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Darktrace is valued 4.1x higher ($5.3B vs $1.3B)
Funding gap: Darktrace has raised $17M more ($230M vs $213M)
Market experience: BioCatch has 2 years more (founded 2011 vs 2013)
Growth stage: BioCatch is at Series D vs Darktrace at Acquired
Team size: BioCatch has 100-500 employees vs Darktrace's 1000-5000
Market base: 🇮🇱 BioCatch (Israel) vs 🇬🇧 Darktrace (United Kingdom)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Security market segment
Awaira Score: Darktrace scores 85/100 vs BioCatch's 80/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose BioCatch if…
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions
Choose Darktrace if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 80/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($5.3B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $230M
- ✓United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Darktrace is an AI cybersecurity company that applies unsupervised machine learning to detect and respond to cyber threats inside enterprise networks, email systems, cloud environments, and operational technology
Funding History
BioCatch raised $213M across 1 round. Darktrace raised $230M across 2 rounds.
BioCatch
Series C
Mar 2020
Lead: Bain Capital Ventures
Darktrace
Series E
Sep 2018
Lead: Vitruvian Partners
Series D
Jul 2017
Lead: Insight Partners
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to BioCatch
Unique to Darktrace
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — BioCatch vs Darktrace
Is BioCatch bigger than Darktrace?▾
Which company raised more funding — BioCatch or Darktrace?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded BioCatch vs Darktrace?▾
What does BioCatch do vs Darktrace?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are BioCatch and Darktrace competitors?▾
Bottom Line
It's close. Both BioCatch and Darktrace are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.
Who Should You Watch?
This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.