BioCatch vs Darktrace
In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
🇮🇱 Israel · Avi Turgeman
Valuation
$1B
Total Funding
$213M
100-500 employees
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Poppy Gustafsson
Valuation
$1.7B
Total Funding
$230M
1000-5000 employees
Analyst Summary
Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations
Both BioCatch and Darktrace compete directly in the AI Security space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. Darktrace is an AI cybersecurity company that applies unsupervised machine learning to detect and respond to cyber threats inside enterprise networks, email systems, cloud environments, and operational technology.
Darktrace ($1.7B) is valued slightly higher than BioCatch ($1B). On the funding side, Darktrace has raised $230M in total — $17M more than BioCatch's $213M.
BioCatch has 2 years more market experience, having been founded in 2011 compared to Darktrace's 2013 founding. In terms of growth stage, BioCatch is at Series D while Darktrace is at Public — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.
BioCatch operates out of 🇮🇱 Israel while Darktrace is based in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, both companies are closely matched — BioCatch scores 80 and Darktrace scores 85.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | BioCatch | Darktrace |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $1B | $1.7BWINS |
📈Total Funding | $213M | $230MWINS |
📅Founded | 2011 | 2013WINS |
🚀Stage | Series D | Public |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 1000-5000 |
🌍Country | Israel | United Kingdom |
🏷️Category | AI Security | AI Security |
⭐Awaira Score | 80 | 85WINS |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Darktrace is valued 1.7x higher ($1.7B vs $1B)
Funding gap: Darktrace has raised $17M more ($230M vs $213M)
Market experience: BioCatch has 2 years more (founded 2011 vs 2013)
Growth stage: BioCatch is at Series D vs Darktrace at Public
Team size: BioCatch has 100-500 employees vs Darktrace's 1000-5000
Market base: 🇮🇱 BioCatch (Israel) vs 🇬🇧 Darktrace (United Kingdom)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Security market segment
Awaira Score: Darktrace scores 85/100 vs BioCatch's 80/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose BioCatch if…
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions
Choose Darktrace if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 80/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($1.7B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $230M
- ✓United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Darktrace is an AI cybersecurity company that applies unsupervised machine learning to detect and respond to cyber threats inside enterprise networks, email systems, cloud environments, and operational technology