Skip to main content

BioCatch vs Netskope

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Netskope is valued at $7.3B — more than 3x BioCatch's $1.3B.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Netskope leads on 3 of 5 metrics

BioCatch

2 wins

-Valuation
-Funding
+Awaira Score
-Team Size
+Experience

Netskope

3 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
-Awaira Score
+Team Size
-Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$1.3B
$7.3B
Total Funding
$213M
$1.4B
Awaira Score
80/100
78/100
Employees
100-500
2500
Founded
2011
2012
Stage
Series D
Public
BioCatchNetskope
Winner
BioCatch logo
BioCatch

🇮🇱 Israel · Avi Turgeman

Series DAI SecurityEst. 2011

Valuation

$1.3B

Total Funding

$213M

Awaira Score80/100

100-500 employees

Full BioCatch Profile →
Netskope logo
Netskope

🇺🇸 United States · Sanjay Beri

PublicAI SecurityEst. 2012

Valuation

$7.3B

Total Funding

$1.4B

Awaira Score78/100

2500 employees

Full Netskope Profile →
Market Context

As AI Security players, BioCatch and Netskope target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — BioCatch at Series D vs Netskope at Public — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

The AI Security sector features both BioCatch and Netskope as key players. BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. Netskope is a cloud-native security platform founded in 2012 that protects organizations against data exfiltration and cyber threats across cloud applications and web services.

Funding & Valuation

A 5.6x valuation gap separates these companies — Netskope at $7.3B and BioCatch at $1.3B. With $1.4B raised, Netskope has attracted substantially more capital than BioCatch ($213M).

Growth Stage

The founding gap is narrow: BioCatch in 2011 versus Netskope in 2012. BioCatch is at Series D while Netskope stands at Public, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. On headcount, BioCatch reports 100-500 employees and Netskope reports 2500.

Geography & Outlook

Geography separates them: BioCatch in 🇮🇱 Israel and Netskope in 🇺🇸 United States, each benefiting from local ecosystems. Awaira's composite score rates them neck-and-neck: BioCatch at 80 and Netskope at 78 out of 100. BioCatch, led by Avi Turgeman, and Netskope, led by Sanjay Beri, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

BioCatch

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$40M

Netskope

Total Rounds6
Avg. Round Size$266.4M
Funding Span11.7 yrs

Funding History

BioCatch has completed 1 funding round, while Netskope has gone through 6. BioCatch's most recent round was a Series C of $40M, compared to Netskope's IPO ($908M). BioCatch is at Series D while Netskope is at Public — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Netskope has the bigger team at roughly 2500 people — 25x the size of BioCatch's 100-500. They're close in age — BioCatch started in 2011 and Netskope in 2012. Geographically, they're in different markets — BioCatch operates out of Israel and Netskope from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricBioCatchNetskope
💰Valuation
$1.3B
$7.3BWINS
📈Total Funding
$213M
$1.4BWINS
📅Founded
2011
2012WINS
🚀Stage
Series D
Public
👥Employees
100-500
2500
🌍Country
Israel
United States
🏷️Category
AI Security
AI Security
Awaira Score
80WINS
78

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Netskope is valued 5.6x higher ($7.3B vs $1.3B)

📈

Funding gap: Netskope has raised $1.2B more ($1.4B vs $213M)

📅

Market experience: BioCatch has 1 year more (founded 2011 vs 2012)

🚀

Growth stage: BioCatch is at Series D vs Netskope at Public

👥

Team size: BioCatch has 100-500 employees vs Netskope's 2500

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇱 BioCatch (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 Netskope (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Security market segment

Awaira Score: BioCatch scores 80/100 vs Netskope's 78/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

BioCatch logo

Choose BioCatch if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 78/100
  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions
Netskope logo

Choose Netskope if…

  • More established by valuation ($7.3B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $1.4B
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Netskope is a cloud-native security platform founded in 2012 that protects organizations against data exfiltration and cyber threats across cloud applications and web services

Funding History

BioCatch raised $213M across 1 round. Netskope raised $1.4B across 6 rounds.

BioCatch

Series C

Mar 2020

Lead: Bain Capital Ventures

$40M

Netskope

IPO

Sep 2025

$908M

Series E

Jan 2021

Series D

Sep 2020

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$200M

Series C

Jan 2018

Lead: Sapphire Ventures

$150M

Series B

Jan 2015

Lead: Norwest Venture Partners

$50M

Series A

Jan 2014

Lead: Accel

$24M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to BioCatch

Bain Capital VenturesAmerican Express Ventures

Unique to Netskope

Sequoia CapitalNorwest Venture PartnersICONIQ CapitalSapphire VenturesAccel

Users Also Compare

FAQ — BioCatch vs Netskope

Is BioCatch bigger than Netskope?
By valuation, Netskope is the larger company at $7.3B versus $1.3B — a 5.6x difference. Size can also be measured by team: BioCatch employs 100-500 people while Netskope has 2500 employees.
Which company raised more funding — BioCatch or Netskope?
Netskope has raised more in total funding at $1.4B, compared to BioCatch's $213M — a gap of $1.2B. Combined, the two companies have completed 7 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
BioCatch leads with an Awaira Score of 80/100, while Netskope sits at 78/100. That 2-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded BioCatch vs Netskope?
BioCatch was founded by Avi Turgeman in 2011. Netskope was founded by Sanjay Beri in 2012. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does BioCatch do vs Netskope?
BioCatch: BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. The Tel Aviv company processes behavioural signals from hundreds of millions of user sessions monthly, building individual profiles that flag deviations indicating fraud.\n\nThe company raised approximately $213 million in venture funding including a Series D led by Tiger Global, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. BioCatch counts over 30 tier-one banks globally among its clients including American Express, NatWest, and Lloyds Banking Group, with deployments protecting online banking and mobile banking sessions from fraud that bypasses traditional authentication controls. The platform is particularly effective against malware-assisted fraud and social engineering scams where the genuine account holder is unknowingly manipulated.\n\nBioCatch competes in the behavioural biometrics and fraud intelligence market alongside ThreatMetrix (now LexisNexis Risk Solutions), Sift, and Sardine, as well as traditional fraud management platforms from FICO and SAS. Its differentiation is the depth of its behavioural feature engineering from passive interaction signals that do not require active user participation, creating a fraud layer that operates continuously without adding friction to legitimate user journeys. The growing prevalence of authorised push payment fraud and social engineering attacks in European banking has expanded the relevant use case for BioCatch beyond traditional account takeover detection. Netskope: Netskope is a cloud-native security platform founded in 2012 that protects organizations against data exfiltration and cyber threats across cloud applications and web services. The company operates a Security Service Edge (SSE) platform combining cloud access security brokers (CASB), firewall-as-a-service (FWaaS), and secure web gateway (SWG) capabilities. Its architecture inspects traffic inline to detect and prevent unauthorized data access, malware, and policy violations. Netskope utilizes machine learning and behavioral analytics to identify anomalous user activity and emerging threats. The platform integrates with enterprise identity and data loss prevention systems, serving organizations across financial services, healthcare, technology, and government sectors. Netskope went public on September 21, 2021, at a valuation of approximately $7.3 billion, having raised $1.44 billion across multiple funding rounds. The company competes with established security vendors including Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, and Fortinet in the cloud security market. Netskope's growth trajectory reflects increased enterprise demand for cloud-first security architectures as organizations accelerate digital transformation. The company expanded its AI security capabilities to address emerging threats in large language model deployments and generative AI adoption among enterprises. Netskope uniquely combines SSE infrastructure with AI-driven threat detection to protect both legacy and cloud-native workloads in a single platform. Netskope operates in the AI Security sector and is headquartered in United States. Founded in 2012 by Sanjay Beri, Netskope has raised $1.4B in total funding, achieving a valuation of $7.3B as of its latest round. The company's funding journey includes a Series A of $24M in 2014, a Series B of $50M in 2015, a Series C of $150M in 2018, a Series D of $200M in 2020, a IPO of $908M in 2025. The most recent round was led by Sequoia Capital. With approximately 2500 employees, Netskope has established itself as a Public-stage player in the AI Security market. The company holds an Awaira Score of 78/100, reflecting its moderate position across valuation, funding trajectory, team scale, and market influence. Netskope competes in a rapidly evolving segment alongside other AI Security companies. Based in United States, Netskope is part of a growing international AI ecosystem attracting talent and investment. The AI Security space has attracted significant investment in recent years, with companies racing to capture enterprise and consumer demand for AI-powered solutions.
Which company was founded first?
BioCatch got there first, launching in 2011 — that's 1 year of extra runway. Netskope didn't arrive until 2012. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
BioCatch has about 100-500 employees; Netskope has about 2500. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are BioCatch and Netskope competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both BioCatch and Netskope compete in AI Security, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

It's close. Both BioCatch and Netskope are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.

Who Should You Watch?

This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive