Skip to main content

BioCatch vs Orca Security

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Orca Security leads in funding with $640M, well ahead of BioCatch's $213M.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Orca Security leads on 3 of 5 metrics

BioCatch

2 wins

-Valuation
-Funding
+Awaira Score
-Team Size
+Experience

Orca Security

3 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
-Awaira Score
+Team Size
-Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$1.3B
$1.8B
Total Funding
$213M
$640M
Awaira Score
80/100
68/100
Employees
100-500
450
Founded
2011
2019
Stage
Series D
Series E
BioCatchOrca Security
Winner
BioCatch logo
BioCatch

🇮🇱 Israel · Avi Turgeman

Series DAI SecurityEst. 2011

Valuation

$1.3B

Total Funding

$213M

Awaira Score80/100

100-500 employees

Full BioCatch Profile →
Orca Security logo
Orca Security

🇺🇸 United States · Avi Shua

Series EAI SecurityEst. 2019

Valuation

$1.8B

Total Funding

$640M

Awaira Score68/100

450 employees

Full Orca Security Profile →
Market Context

As AI Security players, BioCatch and Orca Security target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — BioCatch at Series D vs Orca Security at Series E — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

The AI Security sector features both BioCatch and Orca Security as key players. BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. Orca Security is a cloud security platform founded in 2019 that specializes in AI-driven vulnerability and misconfiguration detection across cloud environments.

Funding & Valuation

Valuations are in a similar range: Orca Security at $1.8B and BioCatch at $1.3B. With $640M raised, Orca Security has attracted substantially more capital than BioCatch ($213M).

Growth Stage

With a 8-year head start, BioCatch (founded 2011) has had considerably more time to mature than Orca Security (2019). Growth stages differ: BioCatch (Series D) versus Orca Security (Series E), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Headcount tells a story too: BioCatch has 100-500 employees and Orca Security has 450.

Geography & Outlook

BioCatch operates out of 🇮🇱 Israel while Orca Security is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. Awaira rates BioCatch at 80 and Orca Security at 68, a gap that reflects differences in capital efficiency and market traction. BioCatch, led by Avi Turgeman, and Orca Security, led by Avi Shua, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

BioCatch

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$40M

Orca Security

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$128M
Funding Span3 yrs

Funding History

BioCatch has completed 1 funding round, while Orca Security has gone through 5. BioCatch's most recent round was a Series C of $40M, compared to Orca Security's Series E ($315M). BioCatch is at Series D while Orca Security is at Series E — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Orca Security has the bigger team at roughly 450 people — 5x the size of BioCatch's 100-500. BioCatch has a 8-year head start, founded in 2011 vs Orca Security's 2019. Geographically, they're in different markets — BioCatch operates out of Israel and Orca Security from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricBioCatchOrca Security
💰Valuation
$1.3B
$1.8BWINS
📈Total Funding
$213M
$640MWINS
📅Founded
2011
2019WINS
🚀Stage
Series D
Series E
👥Employees
100-500
450
🌍Country
Israel
United States
🏷️Category
AI Security
AI Security
Awaira Score
80WINS
68

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Orca Security is valued 1.4x higher ($1.8B vs $1.3B)

📈

Funding gap: Orca Security has raised $427M more ($640M vs $213M)

📅

Market experience: BioCatch has 8 years more (founded 2011 vs 2019)

🚀

Growth stage: BioCatch is at Series D vs Orca Security at Series E

👥

Team size: BioCatch has 100-500 employees vs Orca Security's 450

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇱 BioCatch (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 Orca Security (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Security market segment

Awaira Score: BioCatch scores 80/100 vs Orca Security's 68/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

BioCatch logo

Choose BioCatch if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 68/100
  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions
Orca Security logo

Choose Orca Security if…

  • More established by valuation ($1.8B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $640M
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Orca Security is a cloud security platform founded in 2019 that specializes in AI-driven vulnerability and misconfiguration detection across cloud environments

Funding History

BioCatch raised $213M across 1 round. Orca Security raised $640M across 5 rounds.

BioCatch

Series C

Mar 2020

Lead: Bain Capital Ventures

$40M

Orca Security

Series E

Jan 2023

$315M

Series D

Jan 2022

Lead: Lightspeed Venture Partners

$200M

Series B

Jan 2021

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$40M

Series C

Jan 2021

Lead: Lightspeed Venture Partners

$65M

Series A

Jan 2020

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$20M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to BioCatch

Bain Capital VenturesAmerican Express Ventures

Unique to Orca Security

Lightspeed Venture PartnersSequoia Capital

Users Also Compare

FAQ — BioCatch vs Orca Security

Is BioCatch bigger than Orca Security?
By valuation, Orca Security is the larger company at $1.8B versus $1.3B — a 1.4x difference. Size can also be measured by team: BioCatch employs 100-500 people while Orca Security has 450 employees.
Which company raised more funding — BioCatch or Orca Security?
Orca Security has raised more in total funding at $640M, compared to BioCatch's $213M — a gap of $427M. Combined, the two companies have completed 6 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
BioCatch leads with an Awaira Score of 80/100, while Orca Security sits at 68/100. That 12-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded BioCatch vs Orca Security?
BioCatch was founded by Avi Turgeman in 2011. Orca Security was founded by Avi Shua in 2019. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does BioCatch do vs Orca Security?
BioCatch: BioCatch provides behavioural biometrics and fraud prevention AI that analyses how users physically interact with digital devices — mouse movements, typing cadence, touch pressure, and navigation patterns — to authenticate genuine users and detect account takeover, social engineering, and application fraud in real time during banking and financial transactions. The Tel Aviv company processes behavioural signals from hundreds of millions of user sessions monthly, building individual profiles that flag deviations indicating fraud.\n\nThe company raised approximately $213 million in venture funding including a Series D led by Tiger Global, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. BioCatch counts over 30 tier-one banks globally among its clients including American Express, NatWest, and Lloyds Banking Group, with deployments protecting online banking and mobile banking sessions from fraud that bypasses traditional authentication controls. The platform is particularly effective against malware-assisted fraud and social engineering scams where the genuine account holder is unknowingly manipulated.\n\nBioCatch competes in the behavioural biometrics and fraud intelligence market alongside ThreatMetrix (now LexisNexis Risk Solutions), Sift, and Sardine, as well as traditional fraud management platforms from FICO and SAS. Its differentiation is the depth of its behavioural feature engineering from passive interaction signals that do not require active user participation, creating a fraud layer that operates continuously without adding friction to legitimate user journeys. The growing prevalence of authorised push payment fraud and social engineering attacks in European banking has expanded the relevant use case for BioCatch beyond traditional account takeover detection. Orca Security: Orca Security is a cloud security platform founded in 2019 that specializes in AI-driven vulnerability and misconfiguration detection across cloud environments. The company provides agentless security solutions that scan infrastructure, workloads, and data across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and Kubernetes deployments without requiring agent installation. Orca's core technology uses machine learning algorithms to identify risks including unpatched vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, exposed data, and compliance violations. The platform integrates with existing security tools and provides automated remediation recommendations. The company has secured $640 million in total funding at a $1.8 billion valuation as of its Series E funding round, reflecting significant investor confidence in cloud security solutions. Orca competes with vendors including Wiz, Lacework, and Snyk in the cloud security space. The company targets enterprise organizations managing complex multi-cloud infrastructures seeking consolidated visibility and risk assessment. Orca's agentless approach differentiates it by reducing deployment friction compared to agent-based competitors. The company has achieved notable enterprise adoption across financial services, technology, and healthcare sectors. Its growth trajectory reflects broader market demand for AI-enhanced cloud security tools as organizations accelerate cloud migration and face increasing sophistication in attack vectors targeting cloud infrastructure and data exposure risks. Orca Security's agentless scanning approach eliminates deployment friction while delivering AI-powered risk detection across multiple cloud platforms simultaneously.
Which company was founded first?
BioCatch got there first, launching in 2011 — that's 8 years of extra runway. Orca Security didn't arrive until 2019. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
BioCatch has about 100-500 employees; Orca Security has about 450. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are BioCatch and Orca Security competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both BioCatch and Orca Security compete in AI Security, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

BioCatch edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 80, but Orca Security (68) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.

Who Should You Watch?

BioCatch has a slight edge on paper, but Orca Security isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive