Biofourmis vs Butterfly Network
In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
🇸🇬 Singapore · Kuldeep Singh
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$445M
100-500 employees
🇺🇸 United States · John Martin
Valuation
$1.5B
Total Funding
$700M
500-1000 employees
Analyst Summary
Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations
Both Biofourmis and Butterfly Network compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Biofourmis develops AI-powered digital therapeutics and remote patient monitoring technology that combines wearable biosensor data with machine learning models to predict clinical deterioration, monitor chronic disease progression, and support clinical trial digital endpoint measurement. Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging.
Butterfly Network carries a known valuation of $1.5B, while Biofourmis's valuation has not been publicly disclosed. On the funding side, Butterfly Network has raised $700M in total — $255M more than Biofourmis's $445M.
Butterfly Network has 4 years more market experience, having been founded in 2011 compared to Biofourmis's 2015 founding. In terms of growth stage, Biofourmis is at Series D while Butterfly Network is at Public — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.
Biofourmis operates out of 🇸🇬 Singapore while Butterfly Network is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Butterfly Network leads with a score of 85, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Biofourmis | Butterfly Network |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $1.5B |
📈Total Funding | $445M | $700MWINS |
📅Founded | 2015WINS | 2011 |
🚀Stage | Series D | Public |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | Singapore | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Healthcare | AI Healthcare |
⭐Awaira Score | 73 | 85WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Butterfly Network has raised $255M more ($700M vs $445M)
Market experience: Butterfly Network has 4 years more (founded 2011 vs 2015)
Growth stage: Biofourmis is at Series D vs Butterfly Network at Public
Team size: Biofourmis has 100-500 employees vs Butterfly Network's 500-1000
Market base: 🇸🇬 Biofourmis (Singapore) vs 🇺🇸 Butterfly Network (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment
Awaira Score: Butterfly Network scores 85/100 vs Biofourmis's 73/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Biofourmis if…
- ✓Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Biofourmis develops AI-powered digital therapeutics and remote patient monitoring technology that combines wearable biosensor data with machine learning models to predict clinical deterioration, monitor chronic disease progression, and support clinical trial digital endpoint measurement
Choose Butterfly Network if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 73/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($1.5B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $700M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging