Skip to main content

Biofourmis vs Qure.ai

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Qure.ai is valued at $270M — more than 3x Biofourmis's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Biofourmis leads on 3 of 4 metrics

Biofourmis

3 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
-Team Size
+Experience

Qure.ai

1 win

-Funding
-Awaira Score
+Team Size
-Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$270M
Total Funding
$465M
$160M
Awaira Score
73/100
70/100
Employees
100-500
250
Founded
2015
2016
Stage
Acquired
Series D
BiofourmisQure.ai
Winner
Biofourmis logo
Biofourmis

🇸🇬 Singapore · Kuldeep Singh

AcquiredAI HealthcareEst. 2015

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$465M

Awaira Score73/100

100-500 employees

Full Biofourmis Profile →
Qure.ai logo
Qure.ai

🇮🇳 India · Prashant Warier

Series DAI HealthcareEst. 2016

Valuation

$270M

Total Funding

$160M

Awaira Score70/100

250 employees

Full Qure.ai Profile →
Market Context

As AI Healthcare players, Biofourmis and Qure.ai target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Biofourmis at Acquired vs Qure.ai at Series D — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

AI Healthcare remains a contested market, with Biofourmis and Qure.ai among its most prominent entrants. Biofourmis develops AI-powered digital therapeutics and remote patient monitoring technology that combines wearable biosensor data with machine learning models to predict clinical deterioration, monitor chronic disease progression, and support clinical trial digital endpoint measurement. Qure.

Funding & Valuation

Qure.ai carries a disclosed valuation of $270M, while Biofourmis remains privately valued. In aggregate funding, Biofourmis edges ahead at $465M versus Qure.ai's $160M.

Growth Stage

The founding gap is narrow: Biofourmis in 2015 versus Qure.ai in 2016. Stage-wise, Biofourmis is classified as Acquired and Qure.ai as Series D, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. Headcount tells a story too: Biofourmis has 100-500 employees and Qure.ai has 250.

Geography & Outlook

Geography separates them: Biofourmis in 🇸🇬 Singapore and Qure.ai in 🇮🇳 India, each benefiting from local ecosystems. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, the gap is minimal — Biofourmis scores 73 and Qure.ai scores 70. Biofourmis, led by Kuldeep Singh, and Qure.ai, led by Prashant Warier, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

Biofourmis

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$300M

Qure.ai

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$39.3M
Funding Span5 yrs

Funding History

Biofourmis has completed 1 funding round, while Qure.ai has gone through 5. Biofourmis's most recent round was a Series D of $300M, compared to Qure.ai's Series D ($81M). Biofourmis is at Acquired while Qure.ai is at Series D — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Qure.ai has the bigger team at roughly 250 people — 3x the size of Biofourmis's 100-500. They're close in age — Biofourmis started in 2015 and Qure.ai in 2016. Geographically, they're in different markets — Biofourmis operates out of Singapore and Qure.ai from India.

Metrics Comparison

MetricBiofourmisQure.ai
💰Valuation
N/A
$270M
📈Total Funding
$465MWINS
$160M
📅Founded
2015
2016WINS
🚀Stage
Acquired
Series D
👥Employees
100-500
250
🌍Country
Singapore
India
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
73WINS
70

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Biofourmis has raised $305M more ($465M vs $160M)

📅

Market experience: Biofourmis has 1 year more (founded 2015 vs 2016)

🚀

Growth stage: Biofourmis is at Acquired vs Qure.ai at Series D

👥

Team size: Biofourmis has 100-500 employees vs Qure.ai's 250

🌍

Market base: 🇸🇬 Biofourmis (Singapore) vs 🇮🇳 Qure.ai (India)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Awaira Score: Biofourmis scores 73/100 vs Qure.ai's 70/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Biofourmis logo

Choose Biofourmis if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 73/100 vs 70/100
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $465M
  • More market experience — founded in 2015
  • Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Biofourmis develops AI-powered digital therapeutics and remote patient monitoring technology that combines wearable biosensor data with machine learning models to predict clinical deterioration, monitor chronic disease progression, and support clinical trial digital endpoint measurement
Qure.ai logo

Choose Qure.ai if…

  • More established by valuation ($270M)
  • India-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Qure

Funding History

Biofourmis raised $465M across 1 round. Qure.ai raised $160M across 5 rounds.

Biofourmis

Series D

Dec 2021

Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2

$300M

Qure.ai

Series D

Jan 2021

$81M

Series C

Jan 2020

$50M

Series B

Jan 2018

$20M

Series A

Jan 2017

Lead: Accel

$6M

Seed

Jan 2016

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Biofourmis

SoftBank Vision Fund 2General Atlantic

Unique to Qure.ai

AccelBessemer Venture PartnersGoogle

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Biofourmis vs Qure.ai

Is Biofourmis bigger than Qure.ai?
Qure.ai has a disclosed valuation of $270M, while Biofourmis's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Qure.ai employs 250 people.
Which company raised more funding — Biofourmis or Qure.ai?
Biofourmis has raised more in total funding at $465M, compared to Qure.ai's $160M — a gap of $305M. Combined, the two companies have completed 6 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Biofourmis leads with an Awaira Score of 73/100, while Qure.ai sits at 70/100. That 3-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Biofourmis vs Qure.ai?
Biofourmis was founded by Kuldeep Singh in 2015. Qure.ai was founded by Prashant Warier in 2016. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Biofourmis do vs Qure.ai?
Biofourmis: Biofourmis develops AI-powered digital therapeutics and remote patient monitoring technology that combines wearable biosensor data with machine learning models to predict clinical deterioration, monitor chronic disease progression, and support clinical trial digital endpoint measurement. The Singapore company platform processes continuous physiological data streams from patients in hospital-at-home programs, enabling earlier clinical intervention and reducing avoidable readmissions for heart failure, oncology, and post-surgical patients.\n\nThe company raised approximately $445 million including a Series D from investors including SoftBank Vision Fund 2, Openspace Ventures, and Mass General Brigham Ventures. Biofourmis has built partnerships with health systems including Brigham and Women Hospital, Guy Hospital, and several major Asian health systems for remote monitoring program deployment, and has entered into pharmaceutical partnerships for using its digital monitoring platform as a clinical trial measurement tool to capture digital endpoints.\n\nBiofourmis competes in the remote patient monitoring and digital therapeutics market against BioIntelliSense, Current Health, and Validic, as well as the monitoring capabilities of established medical device companies including Philips and Masimo that are adding AI analytics to their remote monitoring platforms. The hospital-at-home model, which uses continuous remote monitoring AI to substitute inpatient hospital stays for selected patient populations, represents a significant healthcare cost reduction opportunity that health systems in the US, UK, and Asia are actively piloting. Qure.ai: Qure.ai is an Indian artificial intelligence company founded in 2016 that develops machine learning solutions for diagnostic imaging in healthcare. The company specializes in computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems that analyze medical imaging data including chest X-rays, CT scans, and mammograms to identify abnormalities and assist radiologists in clinical decision-making. Its platform uses deep learning algorithms trained on large datasets to detect conditions such as tuberculosis, COVID-19, lung cancer, and other pathologies. Qure.ai's products are deployed across hospitals and diagnostic centers in India and internationally, serving both institutional healthcare providers and diagnostic chains. The company has secured $157 million in total funding and operates at Series D stage with a valuation of $300 million as of recent rounds. Its technology addresses the shortage of radiologists in developing markets while improving diagnostic accuracy and turnaround times. Qure.ai competes in the medical AI space alongside companies like IBM Watson Health, Zebra Medical Vision, and various regional diagnostic AI providers. The company has demonstrated strong traction in the Indian healthcare market and has expanded its reach to international markets. Its growth trajectory reflects increasing adoption of AI-assisted diagnostic solutions globally and the rising demand for scalable healthcare technologies in resource-constrained settings. Qure.ai focuses specifically on diagnostic imaging AI for markets with radiologist shortages, positioning it distinctly within underserved geographies.
Which company was founded first?
Biofourmis got there first, launching in 2015 — that's 1 year of extra runway. Qure.ai didn't arrive until 2016. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Biofourmis has about 100-500 employees; Qure.ai has about 250. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Biofourmis and Qure.ai competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Biofourmis and Qure.ai compete in AI Healthcare, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

It's close. Both Biofourmis and Qure.ai are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.

Who Should You Watch?

This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive