Skip to main content

Classiq vs Graphcore

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Graphcore is valued at $600M — more than 3x Classiq's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Graphcore leads on 4 of 4 metrics

Classiq

0 wins

-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Graphcore

4 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$600M
Total Funding
$63M
$767M
Awaira Score
48/100
85/100
Employees
1-50
500-1000
Founded
2020
2016
Stage
Series C
Acquired
ClassiqGraphcore
Classiq logo
Classiq

🇮🇱 Israel · Nir Minerbi

Series CAI InfrastructureEst. 2020

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$63M

Awaira Score48/100

1-50 employees

Full Classiq Profile →
Winner
Graphcore logo
Graphcore

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Nigel Toon

AcquiredAI InfrastructureEst. 2016

Valuation

$600M

Total Funding

$767M

Awaira Score85/100

500-1000 employees

Full Graphcore Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Infrastructure space, though from different geographies — Classiq in Israel and Graphcore in United Kingdom. Different stages (Series C vs Acquired) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Classiq and Graphcore are direct competitors in AI Infrastructure. Classiq develops quantum computing software that automates the synthesis of quantum circuits from high-level algorithmic descriptions, allowing quantum algorithm developers to specify what computation should be performed without manually designing the low-level quantum gate sequences required to implement it. Graphcore designs the Intelligence Processing Unit, a processor architecture built specifically for machine learning workloads, offering a hardware alternative to NVIDIA GPUs for AI model training and inference.

Funding & Valuation

Only Graphcore has a public valuation on record ($600M); Classiq's has not been disclosed. Graphcore has amassed $767M in total funding, far exceeding Classiq's $63M.

Growth Stage

The founding gap is narrow: Graphcore in 2016 versus Classiq in 2020. Classiq is at Series C while Graphcore stands at Acquired, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Team sizes also differ: Classiq employs 1-50 people versus Graphcore's 500-1000.

Geography & Outlook

Based in 🇮🇱 Israel and 🇬🇧 United Kingdom respectively, Classiq and Graphcore tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, Graphcore leads decisively at 85 compared to Classiq's 48. Under Nir Minerbi and Nigel Toon respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Classiq

Total Rounds4
Avg. Round Size$15.8M
Funding Span4 yrs

Graphcore

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$207.3M
Funding Span2.1 yrs

Funding History

Classiq has completed 4 funding rounds, while Graphcore has gone through 3. Classiq's most recent round was a Series C of $34.7M, compared to Graphcore's Series E ($222M). Classiq is at Series C while Graphcore is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Graphcore has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 500x the size of Classiq's 1-50. Graphcore has a 4-year head start, founded in 2016 vs Classiq's 2020. Geographically, they're in different markets — Classiq operates out of Israel and Graphcore from United Kingdom.

Metrics Comparison

MetricClassiqGraphcore
💰Valuation
N/A
$600M
📈Total Funding
$63M
$767MWINS
📅Founded
2020WINS
2016
🚀Stage
Series C
Acquired
👥Employees
1-50
500-1000
🌍Country
Israel
United Kingdom
🏷️Category
AI Infrastructure
AI Infrastructure
Awaira Score
48
85WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Graphcore has raised $704M more ($767M vs $63M)

📅

Market experience: Graphcore has 4 years more (founded 2016 vs 2020)

🚀

Growth stage: Classiq is at Series C vs Graphcore at Acquired

👥

Team size: Classiq has 1-50 employees vs Graphcore's 500-1000

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇱 Classiq (Israel) vs 🇬🇧 Graphcore (United Kingdom)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Infrastructure market segment

Awaira Score: Graphcore scores 85/100 vs Classiq's 48/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Classiq logo

Choose Classiq if…

  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Classiq develops quantum computing software that automates the synthesis of quantum circuits from high-level algorithmic descriptions, allowing quantum algorithm developers to specify what computation should be performed without manually designing the low-level quantum gate sequences required to implement it
Graphcore logo

Choose Graphcore if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 48/100
  • More established by valuation ($600M)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $767M
  • More market experience — founded in 2016
  • United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Graphcore designs the Intelligence Processing Unit, a processor architecture built specifically for machine learning workloads, offering a hardware alternative to NVIDIA GPUs for AI model training and inference

Funding History

Classiq raised $63M across 4 rounds. Graphcore raised $767M across 3 rounds.

Classiq

Series C

Jun 2024

$34.7M

Series B

Feb 2023

$17.6M

Series A

Oct 2021

$7.6M

Seed

Jun 2020

$3.2M

Graphcore

Series E

Dec 2020

Lead: Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan

$222M

Series D

Dec 2018

Lead: BMW iVentures

$200M

Series C

Nov 2018

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$200M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Graphcore

Ontario Teachers'Baillie GiffordDraper EspritOntario Teachers' Pension PlanBMW iVenturesSamsung

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Classiq vs Graphcore

Is Classiq bigger than Graphcore?
Graphcore has a disclosed valuation of $600M, while Classiq's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Graphcore employs 500-1000 people.
Which company raised more funding — Classiq or Graphcore?
Graphcore has raised more in total funding at $767M, compared to Classiq's $63M — a gap of $704M. Combined, the two companies have completed 7 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Graphcore leads with an Awaira Score of 85/100, while Classiq sits at 48/100. That 37-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Classiq vs Graphcore?
Classiq was founded by Nir Minerbi in 2020. Graphcore was founded by Nigel Toon in 2016. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Classiq do vs Graphcore?
Classiq: Classiq develops quantum computing software that automates the synthesis of quantum circuits from high-level algorithmic descriptions, allowing quantum algorithm developers to specify what computation should be performed without manually designing the low-level quantum gate sequences required to implement it. The Tel Aviv company platform generates optimised quantum circuits for specific hardware backends including IBM, Google, and IonQ quantum processors.\n\nThe company raised approximately $63 million in venture funding including a Series C from investors including HPE, NTT, and HSBC. Classiq targets financial services, pharmaceuticals, and logistics companies investigating quantum computing applications for optimisation, simulation, and machine learning, providing software tools that accelerate quantum algorithm development without requiring deep quantum physics expertise from application developers. The company has partnerships with IBM Quantum and NVIDIA cuQuantum for hybrid classical-quantum workflows.\n\nClassiq competes in the quantum software market alongside Qiskit (IBM), Cirq (Google), and commercial quantum software platforms including 1QBit and QC Ware. The company occupies the abstraction layer between algorithm description and hardware implementation, a segment that becomes increasingly valuable as quantum hardware matures and the bottleneck shifts from physical qubit availability to algorithm development productivity. The long timelines to commercial quantum advantage create both extended runway requirements and extended opportunity windows for quantum software infrastructure companies positioned ahead of hardware maturity. Graphcore: Graphcore designs the Intelligence Processing Unit, a processor architecture built specifically for machine learning workloads, offering a hardware alternative to NVIDIA GPUs for AI model training and inference. The Bristol-based company developed the IPU around a bulk synchronous parallel computation model that distributes model parameters across thousands of processor cores with local memory, achieving high efficiency for sparse and irregular neural network computations that GPUs handle inefficiently.\n\nThe company raised approximately $700 million across six funding rounds including a Series E that valued it at approximately $2.8 billion, with investors including Sequoia Capital, Microsoft, and Samsung Ventures. Graphcore processors are deployed in research institutions including Oxford, Cambridge, and the Rosalind Franklin Institute, as well as commercial AI platforms. The company has shipped multiple IPU generations including the MK2 IPU and Bow IPU, with the Colossus processor and IPU-POD system providing data centre scale AI compute.\n\nGraphcore competes directly against NVIDIA in the AI accelerator market, alongside AMD, Intel Gaudi, and other AI chip startups including Cerebras, SambaNova, and Groq. The AI accelerator market is projected to exceed $100 billion by 2027, driven by demand for model training compute. Graphcore faces the dominant position of NVIDIA and its CUDA software ecosystem as the primary barrier to adoption, requiring significant software investment to match the maturity of CUDA tooling that researchers and engineers have relied on for over a decade.
Which company was founded first?
Graphcore got there first, launching in 2016 — that's 4 years of extra runway. Classiq didn't arrive until 2020. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Classiq has about 1-50 employees; Graphcore has about 500-1000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Classiq and Graphcore competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Classiq and Graphcore compete in AI Infrastructure, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Graphcore has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 85 vs Classiq's 48. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.

Who Should You Watch?

Graphcore is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Classiq has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive