Classiq vs Graphcore
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Graphcore is valued at $600M — more than 3x Classiq's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Classiq
0 wins
Graphcore
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇮🇱 Israel · Nir Minerbi
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$63M
1-50 employees
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Nigel Toon
Valuation
$600M
Total Funding
$767M
500-1000 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Infrastructure space, though from different geographies — Classiq in Israel and Graphcore in United Kingdom. Different stages (Series C vs Acquired) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Classiq and Graphcore are direct competitors in AI Infrastructure. Classiq develops quantum computing software that automates the synthesis of quantum circuits from high-level algorithmic descriptions, allowing quantum algorithm developers to specify what computation should be performed without manually designing the low-level quantum gate sequences required to implement it. Graphcore designs the Intelligence Processing Unit, a processor architecture built specifically for machine learning workloads, offering a hardware alternative to NVIDIA GPUs for AI model training and inference.
Funding & Valuation
Only Graphcore has a public valuation on record ($600M); Classiq's has not been disclosed. Graphcore has amassed $767M in total funding, far exceeding Classiq's $63M.
Growth Stage
The founding gap is narrow: Graphcore in 2016 versus Classiq in 2020. Classiq is at Series C while Graphcore stands at Acquired, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Team sizes also differ: Classiq employs 1-50 people versus Graphcore's 500-1000.
Geography & Outlook
Based in 🇮🇱 Israel and 🇬🇧 United Kingdom respectively, Classiq and Graphcore tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, Graphcore leads decisively at 85 compared to Classiq's 48. Under Nir Minerbi and Nigel Toon respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Classiq
Graphcore
Funding History
Classiq has completed 4 funding rounds, while Graphcore has gone through 3. Classiq's most recent round was a Series C of $34.7M, compared to Graphcore's Series E ($222M). Classiq is at Series C while Graphcore is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Graphcore has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 500x the size of Classiq's 1-50. Graphcore has a 4-year head start, founded in 2016 vs Classiq's 2020. Geographically, they're in different markets — Classiq operates out of Israel and Graphcore from United Kingdom.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Classiq | Graphcore |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $600M |
📈Total Funding | $63M | $767MWINS |
📅Founded | 2020WINS | 2016 |
🚀Stage | Series C | Acquired |
👥Employees | 1-50 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | Israel | United Kingdom |
🏷️Category | AI Infrastructure | AI Infrastructure |
⭐Awaira Score | 48 | 85WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Graphcore has raised $704M more ($767M vs $63M)
Market experience: Graphcore has 4 years more (founded 2016 vs 2020)
Growth stage: Classiq is at Series C vs Graphcore at Acquired
Team size: Classiq has 1-50 employees vs Graphcore's 500-1000
Market base: 🇮🇱 Classiq (Israel) vs 🇬🇧 Graphcore (United Kingdom)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Infrastructure market segment
Awaira Score: Graphcore scores 85/100 vs Classiq's 48/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Classiq if…
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Classiq develops quantum computing software that automates the synthesis of quantum circuits from high-level algorithmic descriptions, allowing quantum algorithm developers to specify what computation should be performed without manually designing the low-level quantum gate sequences required to implement it
Choose Graphcore if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 48/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($600M)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $767M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2016
- ✓United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Graphcore designs the Intelligence Processing Unit, a processor architecture built specifically for machine learning workloads, offering a hardware alternative to NVIDIA GPUs for AI model training and inference
Funding History
Classiq raised $63M across 4 rounds. Graphcore raised $767M across 3 rounds.
Classiq
Series C
Jun 2024
Series B
Feb 2023
Series A
Oct 2021
Seed
Jun 2020
Graphcore
Series E
Dec 2020
Lead: Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan
Series D
Dec 2018
Lead: BMW iVentures
Series C
Nov 2018
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Graphcore
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Classiq vs Graphcore
Is Classiq bigger than Graphcore?▾
Which company raised more funding — Classiq or Graphcore?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Classiq vs Graphcore?▾
What does Classiq do vs Graphcore?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Classiq and Graphcore competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Graphcore has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 85 vs Classiq's 48. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Graphcore is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Classiq has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.