Skip to main content

Classiq vs Nebius

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Nebius is valued at $25B — more than 3x Classiq's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Nebius leads on 3 of 4 metrics

Classiq

1 win

-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
+Experience

Nebius

3 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
-Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$25B
Total Funding
$63M
$2B
Awaira Score
48/100
84/100
Employees
1-50
1,000
Founded
2020
2023
Stage
Series C
Private
ClassiqNebius
Classiq logo
Classiq

🇮🇱 Israel · Nir Minerbi

Series CAI InfrastructureEst. 2020

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$63M

Awaira Score48/100

1-50 employees

Full Classiq Profile →
Winner
N
Nebius

🇳🇱 Netherlands

PrivateAI InfrastructureEst. 2023

Valuation

$25B

Total Funding

$2B

Awaira Score84/100

1,000 employees

Full Nebius Profile →
Market Context

As AI Infrastructure players, Classiq and Nebius target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Classiq at Series C vs Nebius at Private — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Classiq and Nebius both operate in AI Infrastructure, though their strategies diverge significantly. Classiq develops quantum computing software that automates the synthesis of quantum circuits from high-level algorithmic descriptions, allowing quantum algorithm developers to specify what computation should be performed without manually designing the low-level quantum gate sequences required to implement it. Nebius is a Dutch AI infrastructure company that provides full-stack AI cloud computing services, from GPU clusters to managed machine learning platforms.

Funding & Valuation

Nebius carries a disclosed valuation of $25B, while Classiq remains privately valued. Capital raised tells a clear story: Nebius at $2B versus Classiq at $63M — a $1.9B difference.

Growth Stage

Established in 2020, Classiq has a modest 3-year head start over Nebius (2023). Stage-wise, Classiq is classified as Series C and Nebius as Private, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. Team sizes also differ: Classiq employs 1-50 people versus Nebius's 1,000.

Geography & Outlook

Based in 🇮🇱 Israel and 🇳🇱 Netherlands respectively, Classiq and Nebius tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, Nebius leads decisively at 84 compared to Classiq's 48. How each company deploys its capital and talent over the next 12 months will be the deciding factor.

Funding Velocity

Classiq

Total Rounds4
Avg. Round Size$15.8M
Funding Span4 yrs

Nebius

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$2B

Funding History

Classiq has completed 4 funding rounds, while Nebius has gone through 1. Classiq's most recent round was a Series C of $34.7M, compared to Nebius's Strategic ($2B). Classiq is at Series C while Nebius is at Private — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Nebius has the bigger team at roughly 1,000 people — 1000x the size of Classiq's 1-50. Classiq has a 3-year head start, founded in 2020 vs Nebius's 2023. Geographically, they're in different markets — Classiq operates out of Israel and Nebius from Netherlands.

Metrics Comparison

MetricClassiqNebius
💰Valuation
N/A
$25B
📈Total Funding
$63M
$2BWINS
📅Founded
2020
2023WINS
🚀Stage
Series C
Private
👥Employees
1-50
1,000
🌍Country
Israel
Netherlands
🏷️Category
AI Infrastructure
AI Infrastructure
Awaira Score
48
84WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Nebius has raised $1.9B more ($2B vs $63M)

📅

Market experience: Classiq has 3 years more (founded 2020 vs 2023)

🚀

Growth stage: Classiq is at Series C vs Nebius at Private

👥

Team size: Classiq has 1-50 employees vs Nebius's 1,000

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇱 Classiq (Israel) vs 🇳🇱 Nebius (Netherlands)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Infrastructure market segment

Awaira Score: Nebius scores 84/100 vs Classiq's 48/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Classiq logo

Choose Classiq if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2020
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Classiq develops quantum computing software that automates the synthesis of quantum circuits from high-level algorithmic descriptions, allowing quantum algorithm developers to specify what computation should be performed without manually designing the low-level quantum gate sequences required to implement it
N

Choose Nebius if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 84/100 vs 48/100
  • More established by valuation ($25B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $2B
  • Netherlands-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Nebius is a Dutch AI infrastructure company that provides full-stack AI cloud computing services, from GPU clusters to managed machine learning platforms

Funding History

Classiq raised $63M across 4 rounds. Nebius raised $2B across 1 round.

Classiq

Series C

Jun 2024

$34.7M

Series B

Feb 2023

$17.6M

Series A

Oct 2021

$7.6M

Seed

Jun 2020

$3.2M

Nebius

Strategic

Mar 2026

Lead: NVIDIA

$2B

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Nebius

NVIDIA

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Classiq vs Nebius

Is Classiq bigger than Nebius?
Nebius has a disclosed valuation of $25B, while Classiq's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Nebius employs 1,000 people.
Which company raised more funding — Classiq or Nebius?
Nebius has raised more in total funding at $2B, compared to Classiq's $63M — a gap of $1.9B. Combined, the two companies have completed 5 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Nebius leads with an Awaira Score of 84/100, while Classiq sits at 48/100. That 36-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Classiq vs Nebius?
Classiq was founded by Nir Minerbi in 2020. Nebius's founder information is not currently available in our database.
What does Classiq do vs Nebius?
Classiq: Classiq develops quantum computing software that automates the synthesis of quantum circuits from high-level algorithmic descriptions, allowing quantum algorithm developers to specify what computation should be performed without manually designing the low-level quantum gate sequences required to implement it. The Tel Aviv company platform generates optimised quantum circuits for specific hardware backends including IBM, Google, and IonQ quantum processors.\n\nThe company raised approximately $63 million in venture funding including a Series C from investors including HPE, NTT, and HSBC. Classiq targets financial services, pharmaceuticals, and logistics companies investigating quantum computing applications for optimisation, simulation, and machine learning, providing software tools that accelerate quantum algorithm development without requiring deep quantum physics expertise from application developers. The company has partnerships with IBM Quantum and NVIDIA cuQuantum for hybrid classical-quantum workflows.\n\nClassiq competes in the quantum software market alongside Qiskit (IBM), Cirq (Google), and commercial quantum software platforms including 1QBit and QC Ware. The company occupies the abstraction layer between algorithm description and hardware implementation, a segment that becomes increasingly valuable as quantum hardware matures and the bottleneck shifts from physical qubit availability to algorithm development productivity. The long timelines to commercial quantum advantage create both extended runway requirements and extended opportunity windows for quantum software infrastructure companies positioned ahead of hardware maturity. Nebius: Nebius is a Dutch AI infrastructure company that provides full-stack AI cloud computing services, from GPU clusters to managed machine learning platforms. Originally spun out of Yandex, Nebius has established itself as a major AI infrastructure provider with strategic partnerships including a $2 billion investment from NVIDIA and a $27 billion infrastructure deal with Meta covering dedicated GPU capacity and compute resources over a five-year period. The company operates AI-optimized data centers and offers cloud services that span the entire AI stack — from bare-metal GPU access through high-level managed AI services. Nebius competes in the rapidly growing AI cloud market alongside CoreWeave, Lambda, and the major hyperscalers, differentiating through deep engineering expertise across hardware and software layers.
Which company was founded first?
Classiq got there first, launching in 2020 — that's 3 years of extra runway. Nebius didn't arrive until 2023. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Classiq has about 1-50 employees; Nebius has about 1,000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Classiq and Nebius competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Classiq and Nebius compete in AI Infrastructure, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Nebius has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 84 vs Classiq's 48. The difference comes down to funding depth and strategic focus.

Who Should You Watch?

Nebius is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Classiq has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive