Overall Winner: Cogent Labs·55/ 100

Cogent Labs vs Mihup

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Winner
C
Cogent Labs

🇯🇵 Japan · Andrew Hall

Series CNLPEst. 2016

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$50M

55
Awaira Score55/100

100-500 employees

Full Cogent Labs Profile →
M
Mihup

🇮🇳 India · Biplab Kumar Jha

Series ANLPEst. 2016

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$6M

50
Awaira Score50/100

50-200 employees

Full Mihup Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Cogent Labs and Mihup compete directly in the NLP space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Cogent Labs develops AI document processing and text analysis software with specialised capabilities in Japanese character recognition, handwritten text, and structured document data extraction, targeting the Japanese financial services, insurance, and government sectors where large volumes of handwritten and mixed-format documents require processing with high accuracy in Japanese scripts including kanji, hiragana, and katakana. Mihup is a conversation intelligence platform specializing in speech recognition and NLP for Indian languages, offering real-time call analytics, voice search, and speech-to-text capabilities tuned for Indic accents and multilingual code-switching common in Indian call centers.

Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation at this time. On the funding side, Cogent Labs has raised $50M in total — $44M more than Mihup's $6M.

Both companies were founded in 2016, giving them the same market tenure. In terms of growth stage, Cogent Labs is at Series C while Mihup is at Series A — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Cogent Labs operates out of 🇯🇵 Japan while Mihup is based in 🇮🇳 India, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, both companies are closely matched — Cogent Labs scores 55 and Mihup scores 50.

Metrics Comparison

MetricCogent LabsMihup
💰Valuation
N/A
N/A
📈Total Funding
$50MWINS
$6M
📅Founded
2016
2016
🚀Stage
Series C
Series A
👥Employees
100-500
50-200
🌍Country
Japan
India
🏷️Category
NLP
NLP
Awaira Score
55WINS
50

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Cogent Labs has raised $44M more ($50M vs $6M)

🚀

Growth stage: Cogent Labs is at Series C vs Mihup at Series A

👥

Team size: Cogent Labs has 100-500 employees vs Mihup's 50-200

🌍

Market base: 🇯🇵 Cogent Labs (Japan) vs 🇮🇳 Mihup (India)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the NLP market segment

Awaira Score: Cogent Labs scores 55/100 vs Mihup's 50/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

C

Choose Cogent Labs if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 55/100 vs 50/100
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $50M
  • Japan-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Cogent Labs develops AI document processing and text analysis software with specialised capabilities in Japanese character recognition, handwritten text, and structured document data extraction, targeting the Japanese financial services, insurance, and government sectors where large volumes of handwritten and mixed-format documents require processing with high accuracy in Japanese scripts including kanji, hiragana, and katakana
M

Choose Mihup if…

  • India-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Mihup is a conversation intelligence platform specializing in speech recognition and NLP for Indian languages, offering real-time call analytics, voice search, and speech-to-text capabilities tuned for Indic accents and multilingual code-switching common in Indian call centers

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Cogent Labs vs Mihup

Is Cogent Labs bigger than Mihup?
Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation, making a definitive size comparison difficult. Cogent Labs employs 100-500 people, while Mihup has 50-200 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Cogent Labs or Mihup?
Cogent Labs has raised more in total funding at $50M, compared to Mihup's $6M — a gap of $44M.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Cogent Labs holds the higher Awaira Score at 55/100, compared to Mihup's 50/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 5-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Cogent Labs vs Mihup?
Cogent Labs was founded by Andrew Hall in 2016. Mihup was founded by Biplab Kumar Jha in 2016. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Cogent Labs do vs Mihup?
Cogent Labs: Cogent Labs develops AI document processing and text analysis software with specialised capabilities in Japanese character recognition, handwritten text, and structured document data extraction, targeting the Japanese financial services, insurance, and government sectors where large volumes of handwritten and mixed-format documents require processing with high accuracy in Japanese scripts including kanji, hiragana, and katakana. The Tokyo company applies deep learning models trained on large Japanese document datasets to achieve recognition accuracy on complex Japanese text that general OCR systems cannot match.\n\nThe company raised approximately $50 million in venture funding from investors including WiL and Goldman Sachs. Cogent Labs Tegaki handwriting recognition product has been deployed by major Japanese insurance companies, financial institutions, and public sector organisations to automate document digitisation workflows that previously required large manual data entry teams. The Japanese market for document AI is substantial given the volume of paper-based documents in government and financial services operations and the complexity of Japanese script that makes off-the-shelf OCR insufficient.\n\nCogent Labs competes in the Japanese document AI market against OBIC, NTT Data, and international intelligent document processing vendors including ABBYY and Kofax. Its Japanese-specific technical capabilities create a natural market advantage that English-first vendors struggle to match through localisation alone, as accurate Japanese handwriting recognition requires specialised model training that cannot be derived from models built primarily on Latin character datasets. The company has expanded internationally to address Korean and other East Asian scripts with similar character recognition complexity. Mihup: Mihup is a conversation intelligence platform specializing in speech recognition and NLP for Indian languages, offering real-time call analytics, voice search, and speech-to-text capabilities tuned for Indic accents and multilingual code-switching common in Indian call centers. The platform serves BFSI, telecom, and retail customers that operate large vernacular customer support operations.\n\nThe company raised approximately $6M in Series A funding and has built proprietary speech models for Bengali, Hindi, and other regional languages that outperform global ASR providers on Indian accent benchmarks. Mihup's products are deployed in production contact centers processing high daily call volumes.\n\nAccurate speech AI for Indian languages remains an underserved technical problem given the phonetic diversity and code-switching patterns of Indian speakers. Mihup's focus on this specific challenge, combined with years of proprietary training data collected from real call center environments, gives the company a technical moat that is difficult for English-first global vendors to replicate quickly.
Which company was founded first?
Both Cogent Labs and Mihup were founded in the same year — 2016. Despite sharing a founding year, they may have launched at different times within that year, which can matter in fast-moving AI markets.
Which company has more employees?
Cogent Labs has approximately 100-500 employees, while Mihup has approximately 50-200. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Cogent Labs and Mihup competitors?
Yes, Cogent Labs and Mihup are direct competitors — both operate in the NLP space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.