Cogent Labs vs Scatter Lab
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Cogent Labs has raised $50M — double what Scatter Lab has pulled in.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Cogent Labs
3 wins
Scatter Lab
1 win
Key Numbers
🇯🇵 Japan · Andrew Hall
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$50M
100-500 employees
🇰🇷 South Korea · Kim Jong-yoon
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$15M
1-50 employees
Both companies compete in the NLP space, though from different geographies — Cogent Labs in Japan and Scatter Lab in South Korea. Different stages (Series C vs Series B) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
In the NLP market, Cogent Labs and Scatter Lab represent two distinct approaches. Cogent Labs develops AI document processing and text analysis software with specialised capabilities in Japanese character recognition, handwritten text, and structured document data extraction, targeting the Japanese financial services, insurance, and government sectors where large volumes of handwritten and mixed-format documents require processing with high accuracy in Japanese scripts including kanji, hiragana, and katakana. Scatter Lab develops emotional AI and conversational applications in Korean, most notably Luda, a social chatbot designed for conversational companionship that engages users in casual, emotionally warm dialogue.
Funding & Valuation
Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation. Cogent Labs has amassed $50M in total funding, far exceeding Scatter Lab's $15M.
Growth Stage
Established in 2014, Scatter Lab has a modest 2-year head start over Cogent Labs (2016). Stage-wise, Cogent Labs is classified as Series C and Scatter Lab as Series B, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. Team sizes also differ: Cogent Labs employs 100-500 people versus Scatter Lab's 1-50.
Geography & Outlook
Cogent Labs operates out of 🇯🇵 Japan while Scatter Lab is based in 🇰🇷 South Korea, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. Cogent Labs scores 55 on Awaira's composite index versus Scatter Lab's 38, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. Under Andrew Hall and Kim Jong-yoon respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Cogent Labs
Scatter Lab
Funding History
Cogent Labs has completed 4 funding rounds, while Scatter Lab has gone through 3. Cogent Labs's most recent round was a Series C of $27.5M, compared to Scatter Lab's Series B ($10.5M). Cogent Labs is at Series C while Scatter Lab is at Series B — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Cogent Labs is significantly larger with about 100-500 employees, compared to Scatter Lab's 1-50. That's a 100x difference in headcount. They're close in age — Cogent Labs started in 2016 and Scatter Lab in 2014. Geographically, they're in different markets — Cogent Labs operates out of Japan and Scatter Lab from South Korea.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Cogent Labs | Scatter Lab |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | N/A |
📈Total Funding | $50MWINS | $15M |
📅Founded | 2016WINS | 2014 |
🚀Stage | Series C | Series B |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 1-50 |
🌍Country | Japan | South Korea |
🏷️Category | NLP | NLP |
⭐Awaira Score | 55WINS | 38 |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Cogent Labs has raised $35M more ($50M vs $15M)
Market experience: Scatter Lab has 2 years more (founded 2014 vs 2016)
Growth stage: Cogent Labs is at Series C vs Scatter Lab at Series B
Team size: Cogent Labs has 100-500 employees vs Scatter Lab's 1-50
Market base: 🇯🇵 Cogent Labs (Japan) vs 🇰🇷 Scatter Lab (South Korea)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the NLP market segment
Awaira Score: Cogent Labs scores 55/100 vs Scatter Lab's 38/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Cogent Labs if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 55/100 vs 38/100
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $50M
- ✓Japan-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Cogent Labs develops AI document processing and text analysis software with specialised capabilities in Japanese character recognition, handwritten text, and structured document data extraction, targeting the Japanese financial services, insurance, and government sectors where large volumes of handwritten and mixed-format documents require processing with high accuracy in Japanese scripts including kanji, hiragana, and katakana
Choose Scatter Lab if…
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2014
- ✓South Korea-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Scatter Lab develops emotional AI and conversational applications in Korean, most notably Luda, a social chatbot designed for conversational companionship that engages users in casual, emotionally warm dialogue
Funding History
Cogent Labs raised $50M across 4 rounds. Scatter Lab raised $15M across 3 rounds.
Cogent Labs
Series C
Jun 2020
Series B
Feb 2019
Series A
Oct 2017
Seed
Jun 2016
Scatter Lab
Series B
Feb 2017
Series A
Oct 2015
Seed
Jun 2014
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Cogent Labs vs Scatter Lab
Is Cogent Labs bigger than Scatter Lab?▾
Which company raised more funding — Cogent Labs or Scatter Lab?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Cogent Labs vs Scatter Lab?▾
What does Cogent Labs do vs Scatter Lab?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Cogent Labs and Scatter Lab competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Cogent Labs has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 55 vs Scatter Lab's 38. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Cogent Labs has the edge right now — higher Awaira Score and more capital to work with. That said, Scatter Lab could close the gap with the right round or product launch. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.