Skip to main content

Covariant vs Mobileye

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Mobileye is valued at $7.6B — more than 3x Covariant's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Mobileye leads on 3 of 3 metrics

Covariant

0 wins

-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Mobileye

3 wins

+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$7.6B
Total Funding
$222M
N/A
Awaira Score
70/100
92/100
Employees
100-500
1000+
Founded
2017
1999
Stage
Acquired
Public
CovariantMobileye
Covariant logo
Covariant

🇺🇸 United States · Pieter Abbeel

AcquiredAI RoboticsEst. 2017

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$222M

Awaira Score70/100

100-500 employees

Full Covariant Profile →
Winner
Mobileye logo
Mobileye

🇮🇱 Israel · Amnon Shashua

PublicAI RoboticsEst. 1999

Valuation

$7.6B

Total Funding

N/A

Awaira Score92/100

1000+ employees

Full Mobileye Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Robotics space, though from different geographies — Covariant in United States and Mobileye in Israel. Different stages (Acquired vs Public) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Covariant and Mobileye are direct competitors in AI Robotics. Covariant builds an AI robotic picking and automation platform that enables warehouse and fulfillment robots to handle the enormous variety of product shapes, sizes, and packaging types encountered in real-world logistics operations. Mobileye designs AI chips and software systems for advanced driver assistance and autonomous driving, producing the EyeQ system-on-chip series and associated computer vision software stack that is integrated into hundreds of millions of vehicles globally as the technical foundation for features including lane keeping, automatic emergency braking, and adaptive cruise control.

Funding & Valuation

Only Mobileye has a public valuation on record ($7.6B); Covariant's has not been disclosed. Covariant has raised $222M in disclosed funding.

Growth Stage

Covariant is the younger company by 18 years, having launched in 2017 compared to Mobileye's 1999 founding. Growth stages differ: Covariant (Acquired) versus Mobileye (Public), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Team sizes also differ: Covariant employs 100-500 people versus Mobileye's 1000+.

Geography & Outlook

Covariant operates out of 🇺🇸 United States while Mobileye is based in 🇮🇱 Israel, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, Mobileye leads decisively at 92 compared to Covariant's 70. Under Pieter Abbeel and Amnon Shashua respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Covariant

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$80M

Mobileye

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$193.9M
Funding Span-0.5 yrs

Funding History

Covariant has completed 1 funding round, while Mobileye has gone through 5. Covariant's most recent round was a Series C of $80M, compared to Mobileye's IPO ($358.7M). Covariant is at Acquired while Mobileye is at Public — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Mobileye has the bigger team at roughly 1000+ people — 10x the size of Covariant's 100-500. Mobileye has a 18-year head start, founded in 1999 vs Covariant's 2017. Geographically, they're in different markets — Covariant operates out of United States and Mobileye from Israel.

Metrics Comparison

MetricCovariantMobileye
💰Valuation
N/A
$7.6B
📈Total Funding
$222M
N/A
📅Founded
2017WINS
1999
🚀Stage
Acquired
Public
👥Employees
100-500
1000+
🌍Country
United States
Israel
🏷️Category
AI Robotics
AI Robotics
Awaira Score
70
92WINS

Key Differences

📅

Market experience: Mobileye has 18 years more (founded 1999 vs 2017)

🚀

Growth stage: Covariant is at Acquired vs Mobileye at Public

👥

Team size: Covariant has 100-500 employees vs Mobileye's 1000+

🌍

Market base: 🇺🇸 Covariant (United States) vs 🇮🇱 Mobileye (Israel)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Robotics market segment

Awaira Score: Mobileye scores 92/100 vs Covariant's 70/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Covariant logo

Choose Covariant if…

  • Stronger investor backing — raised $222M
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Covariant builds an AI robotic picking and automation platform that enables warehouse and fulfillment robots to handle the enormous variety of product shapes, sizes, and packaging types encountered in real-world logistics operations
Mobileye logo

Choose Mobileye if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 92/100 vs 70/100
  • More established by valuation ($7.6B)
  • More market experience — founded in 1999
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Mobileye designs AI chips and software systems for advanced driver assistance and autonomous driving, producing the EyeQ system-on-chip series and associated computer vision software stack that is integrated into hundreds of millions of vehicles globally as the technical foundation for features including lane keeping, automatic emergency braking, and adaptive cruise control

Funding History

Covariant raised $222M across 1 round. Mobileye raised N/A across 5 rounds.

Covariant

Series C

Jul 2021

Lead: Radical Ventures

$80M

Mobileye

IPO

Sep 2003

$358.7M

Series C

Jan 2002

$290.8M

Series B

Jul 2001

$193.9M

Series A

May 2000

$96.9M

Seed

Jan 1999

$29.1M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Covariant

Radical VenturesIndex Ventures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Covariant vs Mobileye

Is Covariant bigger than Mobileye?
Mobileye has a disclosed valuation of $7.6B, while Covariant's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Mobileye employs 1000+ people.
Which company raised more funding — Covariant or Mobileye?
Covariant has raised $222M in disclosed funding across 1 known round. Mobileye's funding history is not publicly available.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Mobileye leads with an Awaira Score of 92/100, while Covariant sits at 70/100. That 22-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Covariant vs Mobileye?
Covariant was founded by Pieter Abbeel in 2017. Mobileye was founded by Amnon Shashua in 1999. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Covariant do vs Mobileye?
Covariant: Covariant builds an AI robotic picking and automation platform that enables warehouse and fulfillment robots to handle the enormous variety of product shapes, sizes, and packaging types encountered in real-world logistics operations. The platform is built on RFM-1, a foundation model for robotics trained on one of the largest robotics datasets ever assembled, enabling generalized manipulation capabilities across new product types without task-specific retraining.\n\nThe company raised approximately 222 million USD and has deployed its AI in warehouse environments at major retailers and logistics operators in North America and Europe, with robots handling millions of picks per day across diverse SKU catalogs. Covariant was founded by researchers from UC Berkeley with foundational backgrounds in deep reinforcement learning for robotic manipulation.\n\nIntelligent robotic picking remains one of the hardest unsolved problems in warehouse automation, as the combinatorial variety of product types encountered in e-commerce fulfillment exceeds what rule-based vision systems can handle reliably. Covariant approach of training a generalist manipulation model on large-scale real-world robotics data parallels the approach that made large language models broadly capable, and represents one of the most technically credible attempts to bring general robot AI to industrial deployment at scale. Mobileye: Mobileye designs AI chips and software systems for advanced driver assistance and autonomous driving, producing the EyeQ system-on-chip series and associated computer vision software stack that is integrated into hundreds of millions of vehicles globally as the technical foundation for features including lane keeping, automatic emergency braking, and adaptive cruise control. The Jerusalem company was founded as a camera-based ADAS system pioneer before the autonomous vehicle era and grew to dominate the mass-market vehicle safety chip segment.\n\nMobileye was acquired by Intel in 2017 for approximately $15 billion and subsequently relisted on NASDAQ in 2022 in one of the largest technology IPOs of that year, with Intel retaining a majority stake. The company reports its EyeQ chips are integrated into vehicles from over 50 automakers globally, representing a dominant market share in camera-based ADAS hardware. Mobileye has expanded its product roadmap beyond ADAS toward full autonomy products including its Robotaxi platform, tested in Munich, Detroit, and Tel Aviv with selected mobility partners.\n\nMobileye competes in the ADAS and autonomous driving chip market against NVIDIA Drive, Qualcomm Snapdragon Ride, and Texas Instruments for automotive processor design wins, as well as against Waymo, Cruise, and Zoox in autonomous vehicle deployment. Its vertical integration across chip design, computer vision software, and mapping data creates a complete ADAS stack that automakers can implement without integrating components from multiple vendors. The Israel engineering heritage in computer vision, combined with decades of automaker relationships, gives Mobileye structural advantages in a market where safety certification requirements create multi-year adoption timelines.
Which company was founded first?
Mobileye got there first, launching in 1999 — that's 18 years of extra runway. Covariant didn't arrive until 2017. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Covariant has about 100-500 employees; Mobileye has about 1000+. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Covariant and Mobileye competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Covariant and Mobileye compete in AI Robotics, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Mobileye has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 92 vs Covariant's 70. The difference comes down to market positioning and team scale.

Who Should You Watch?

Mobileye has a slight edge on paper, but Covariant isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive