Covariant vs Mobileye
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Mobileye is valued at $7.6B — more than 3x Covariant's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Covariant
0 wins
Mobileye
3 wins
Key Numbers
🇺🇸 United States · Pieter Abbeel
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$222M
100-500 employees
🇮🇱 Israel · Amnon Shashua
Valuation
$7.6B
Total Funding
N/A
1000+ employees
Both companies compete in the AI Robotics space, though from different geographies — Covariant in United States and Mobileye in Israel. Different stages (Acquired vs Public) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Covariant and Mobileye are direct competitors in AI Robotics. Covariant builds an AI robotic picking and automation platform that enables warehouse and fulfillment robots to handle the enormous variety of product shapes, sizes, and packaging types encountered in real-world logistics operations. Mobileye designs AI chips and software systems for advanced driver assistance and autonomous driving, producing the EyeQ system-on-chip series and associated computer vision software stack that is integrated into hundreds of millions of vehicles globally as the technical foundation for features including lane keeping, automatic emergency braking, and adaptive cruise control.
Funding & Valuation
Only Mobileye has a public valuation on record ($7.6B); Covariant's has not been disclosed. Covariant has raised $222M in disclosed funding.
Growth Stage
Covariant is the younger company by 18 years, having launched in 2017 compared to Mobileye's 1999 founding. Growth stages differ: Covariant (Acquired) versus Mobileye (Public), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Team sizes also differ: Covariant employs 100-500 people versus Mobileye's 1000+.
Geography & Outlook
Covariant operates out of 🇺🇸 United States while Mobileye is based in 🇮🇱 Israel, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, Mobileye leads decisively at 92 compared to Covariant's 70. Under Pieter Abbeel and Amnon Shashua respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Covariant
Mobileye
Funding History
Covariant has completed 1 funding round, while Mobileye has gone through 5. Covariant's most recent round was a Series C of $80M, compared to Mobileye's IPO ($358.7M). Covariant is at Acquired while Mobileye is at Public — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Mobileye has the bigger team at roughly 1000+ people — 10x the size of Covariant's 100-500. Mobileye has a 18-year head start, founded in 1999 vs Covariant's 2017. Geographically, they're in different markets — Covariant operates out of United States and Mobileye from Israel.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Covariant | Mobileye |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $7.6B |
📈Total Funding | $222M | N/A |
📅Founded | 2017WINS | 1999 |
🚀Stage | Acquired | Public |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 1000+ |
🌍Country | United States | Israel |
🏷️Category | AI Robotics | AI Robotics |
⭐Awaira Score | 70 | 92WINS |
Key Differences
Market experience: Mobileye has 18 years more (founded 1999 vs 2017)
Growth stage: Covariant is at Acquired vs Mobileye at Public
Team size: Covariant has 100-500 employees vs Mobileye's 1000+
Market base: 🇺🇸 Covariant (United States) vs 🇮🇱 Mobileye (Israel)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Robotics market segment
Awaira Score: Mobileye scores 92/100 vs Covariant's 70/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Covariant if…
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $222M
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Covariant builds an AI robotic picking and automation platform that enables warehouse and fulfillment robots to handle the enormous variety of product shapes, sizes, and packaging types encountered in real-world logistics operations
Choose Mobileye if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 92/100 vs 70/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($7.6B)
- ✓More market experience — founded in 1999
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Mobileye designs AI chips and software systems for advanced driver assistance and autonomous driving, producing the EyeQ system-on-chip series and associated computer vision software stack that is integrated into hundreds of millions of vehicles globally as the technical foundation for features including lane keeping, automatic emergency braking, and adaptive cruise control
Funding History
Covariant raised $222M across 1 round. Mobileye raised N/A across 5 rounds.
Covariant
Series C
Jul 2021
Lead: Radical Ventures
Mobileye
IPO
Sep 2003
Series C
Jan 2002
Series B
Jul 2001
Series A
May 2000
Seed
Jan 1999
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Covariant
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Covariant vs Mobileye
Is Covariant bigger than Mobileye?▾
Which company raised more funding — Covariant or Mobileye?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Covariant vs Mobileye?▾
What does Covariant do vs Mobileye?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Covariant and Mobileye competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Mobileye has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 92 vs Covariant's 70. The difference comes down to market positioning and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Mobileye has a slight edge on paper, but Covariant isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.