Skip to main content
Overall Winner: Graphcore·85/ 100

d-Matrix vs Graphcore

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

d-Matrix is valued at $2B — more than 3x Graphcore's $500M.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Graphcore leads on 4 of 5 metrics

d-Matrix

1 win

+Valuation
-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Graphcore

4 wins

-Valuation
+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience
d-Matrix logo
d-Matrix

🇺🇸 United States · Sid Sheth

Series CAI InfrastructureEst. 2019

Valuation

$2B

Total Funding

$450M

Awaira Score68/100

150 employees

Full d-Matrix Profile →
Winner
Graphcore logo
Graphcore

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Nigel Toon

AcquiredAI InfrastructureEst. 2016

Valuation

$500M

Total Funding

$700M

Awaira Score85/100

500-1000 employees

Full Graphcore Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Infrastructure space, though from different geographies — d-Matrix in United States and Graphcore in United Kingdom. Different stages (Series C vs Acquired) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

d-Matrix and Graphcore are direct competitors in AI Infrastructure. d-Matrix is an AI infrastructure company founded in 2019 that develops hardware and software solutions optimized for generative AI and large language model inference. Graphcore designs the Intelligence Processing Unit, a processor architecture built specifically for machine learning workloads, offering a hardware alternative to NVIDIA GPUs for AI model training and inference.

Market pricing favors d-Matrix at $2B, a 4x premium over Graphcore's $500M mark. d-Matrix has raised $450M while Graphcore has raised $700M, keeping their war chests in the same ballpark.

Graphcore was founded in 2016, 3 years before d-Matrix arrived in 2019. d-Matrix is at Series C while Graphcore stands at Acquired, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Team sizes also differ: d-Matrix employs 150 people versus Graphcore's 500-1000.

Geography separates them: d-Matrix in 🇺🇸 United States and Graphcore in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom, each benefiting from local ecosystems. A 17-point gap on the Awaira Score (Graphcore: 85, d-Matrix: 68) signals a clear difference in overall company strength. Under Sid Sheth and Nigel Toon respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Key Numbers

Valuation
$2B
$500M
Total Funding
$450M
$700M
Awaira Score
68/100
85/100
Employees
150
500-1000
Founded
2019
2016
Stage
Series C
Acquired
d-MatrixGraphcore

Funding Velocity

d-Matrix

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$150M
Funding Span2.7 yrs

Graphcore

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$207.3M
Funding Span2.1 yrs

Funding History

d-Matrix has completed 3 funding rounds, while Graphcore has gone through 3. d-Matrix's most recent round was a Series C of $343M, compared to Graphcore's Series E ($222M). d-Matrix is at Series C while Graphcore is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Graphcore has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 3x the size of d-Matrix's 150. Graphcore has a 3-year head start, founded in 2016 vs d-Matrix's 2019. Geographically, they're in different markets — d-Matrix operates out of United States and Graphcore from United Kingdom.

Metrics Comparison

Metricd-MatrixGraphcore
💰Valuation
$2BWINS
$500M
📈Total Funding
$450M
$700MWINS
📅Founded
2019WINS
2016
🚀Stage
Series C
Acquired
👥Employees
150
500-1000
🌍Country
United States
United Kingdom
🏷️Category
AI Infrastructure
AI Infrastructure
Awaira Score
68
85WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: d-Matrix is valued 4x higher ($2B vs $500M)

📈

Funding gap: Graphcore has raised $250M more ($700M vs $450M)

📅

Market experience: Graphcore has 3 years more (founded 2016 vs 2019)

🚀

Growth stage: d-Matrix is at Series C vs Graphcore at Acquired

👥

Team size: d-Matrix has 150 employees vs Graphcore's 500-1000

🌍

Market base: 🇺🇸 d-Matrix (United States) vs 🇬🇧 Graphcore (United Kingdom)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Infrastructure market segment

Awaira Score: Graphcore scores 85/100 vs d-Matrix's 68/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

d-Matrix logo

Choose d-Matrix if…

  • More established by valuation ($2B)
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • d-Matrix is an AI infrastructure company founded in 2019 that develops hardware and software solutions optimized for generative AI and large language model inference
Graphcore logo

Choose Graphcore if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 68/100
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $700M
  • More market experience — founded in 2016
  • United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Graphcore designs the Intelligence Processing Unit, a processor architecture built specifically for machine learning workloads, offering a hardware alternative to NVIDIA GPUs for AI model training and inference

Funding History

d-Matrix raised $450M across 3 rounds. Graphcore raised $700M across 3 rounds.

d-Matrix

Series C

Jun 2023

Lead: Bessemer Venture Partners

$343M

Series B

Oct 2021

Lead: Bessemer Venture Partners

$87M

Series A

Sep 2020

Lead: Khosla Ventures

$20M

Graphcore

Series E

Dec 2020

Lead: Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan

$222M

Series D

Dec 2018

Lead: BMW iVentures

$200M

Series C

Nov 2018

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$200M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to d-Matrix

Bessemer Venture PartnersKhosla VenturesSilverton PartnersLightspeed Venture Partners

Unique to Graphcore

Ontario Teachers'Baillie GiffordDraper EspritOntario Teachers' Pension PlanBMW iVenturesSamsung

Users Also Compare

FAQ — d-Matrix vs Graphcore

Is d-Matrix bigger than Graphcore?
By valuation, d-Matrix is the larger company at $2B versus $500M — a 4x difference. Size can also be measured by team: d-Matrix employs 150 people while Graphcore has 500-1000 employees.
Which company raised more funding — d-Matrix or Graphcore?
Graphcore has raised more in total funding at $700M, compared to d-Matrix's $450M — a gap of $250M. Combined, the two companies have completed 6 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Graphcore leads with an Awaira Score of 85/100, while d-Matrix sits at 68/100. That 17-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded d-Matrix vs Graphcore?
d-Matrix was founded by Sid Sheth in 2019. Graphcore was founded by Nigel Toon in 2016. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does d-Matrix do vs Graphcore?
d-Matrix: d-Matrix is an AI infrastructure company founded in 2019 that develops hardware and software solutions optimized for generative AI and large language model inference. The company designs specialized processors and system architectures to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of deploying AI models at scale. d-Matrix's core technology focuses on reducing latency and power consumption in AI workloads, addressing key bottlenecks in data center operations. The company has raised $450 million across funding rounds, achieving a $2.0 billion valuation as of its Series C stage. d-Matrix competes in the competitive AI infrastructure market alongside companies developing custom silicon and inference acceleration platforms. Its approach targets enterprises and cloud providers requiring optimized inference capabilities for large-scale AI deployments. The company operates within the growing segment of AI infrastructure providers that emerged to support the infrastructure demands of modern generative AI applications. d-Matrix's positioning emphasizes efficiency gains and operational cost reduction compared to standard computing infrastructure. The company addresses a critical market need as organizations seek to deploy AI models economically while maintaining performance requirements. Its technology appeals to data center operators and enterprises managing substantial inference workloads. d-Matrix represents the category of specialized hardware companies built to support the computational demands of contemporary AI systems. The company's trajectory reflects broader industry expansion in AI infrastructure optimization and deployment technologies. d-Matrix specializes in inference optimization hardware specifically designed to reduce the computational and energy costs of deploying large language models at scale. Graphcore: Graphcore designs the Intelligence Processing Unit, a processor architecture built specifically for machine learning workloads, offering a hardware alternative to NVIDIA GPUs for AI model training and inference. The Bristol-based company developed the IPU around a bulk synchronous parallel computation model that distributes model parameters across thousands of processor cores with local memory, achieving high efficiency for sparse and irregular neural network computations that GPUs handle inefficiently.\n\nThe company raised approximately $700 million across six funding rounds including a Series E that valued it at approximately $2.8 billion, with investors including Sequoia Capital, Microsoft, and Samsung Ventures. Graphcore processors are deployed in research institutions including Oxford, Cambridge, and the Rosalind Franklin Institute, as well as commercial AI platforms. The company has shipped multiple IPU generations including the MK2 IPU and Bow IPU, with the Colossus processor and IPU-POD system providing data centre scale AI compute.\n\nGraphcore competes directly against NVIDIA in the AI accelerator market, alongside AMD, Intel Gaudi, and other AI chip startups including Cerebras, SambaNova, and Groq. The AI accelerator market is projected to exceed $100 billion by 2027, driven by demand for model training compute. Graphcore faces the dominant position of NVIDIA and its CUDA software ecosystem as the primary barrier to adoption, requiring significant software investment to match the maturity of CUDA tooling that researchers and engineers have relied on for over a decade.
Which company was founded first?
Graphcore got there first, launching in 2016 — that's 3 years of extra runway. d-Matrix didn't arrive until 2019. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
d-Matrix has about 150 employees; Graphcore has about 500-1000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are d-Matrix and Graphcore competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both d-Matrix and Graphcore compete in AI Infrastructure, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Graphcore has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 85 vs d-Matrix's 68. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.

Who Should You Watch?

Graphcore is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But d-Matrix has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive