Databricks vs Patsnap
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Databricks is valued at $134B — more than 3x Patsnap's $1B.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Databricks
4 wins
Patsnap
1 win
Key Numbers
🇺🇸 United States · Ali Ghodsi
Valuation
$134B
Total Funding
$20.2B
6,000 employees
🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong
Valuation
$1B
Total Funding
$300M
500-1000 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — Databricks in United States and Patsnap in Singapore. Different stages (Private vs Series E) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Within AI Data, Databricks and Patsnap rank among the most closely watched rivals. Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents.
Funding & Valuation
The valuation disparity is stark: Databricks at $134B versus Patsnap at $1B, a 134x difference. On the funding front, Databricks has secured $20.2B, outpacing Patsnap's $300M by $19.9B.
Growth Stage
Patsnap (est. 2007) predates Databricks (est. 2013) by 6 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Growth stages differ: Databricks (Private) versus Patsnap (Series E), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. On headcount, Databricks reports 6,000 employees and Patsnap reports 500-1000.
Geography & Outlook
Based in 🇺🇸 United States and 🇸🇬 Singapore respectively, Databricks and Patsnap tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. The Awaira Score gives Databricks (93) a notable lead over Patsnap (80). Under Ali Ghodsi and Jeffrey Tiong respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Databricks
Patsnap
Funding History
Databricks has completed 5 funding rounds, while Patsnap has gone through 1. Databricks's most recent round was a Series E of $250M, compared to Patsnap's Series E ($300M). Databricks is at Private while Patsnap is at Series E — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Databricks is significantly larger with about 6,000 employees, compared to Patsnap's 500-1000. That's a 12x difference in headcount. Patsnap has a 6-year head start, founded in 2007 vs Databricks's 2013. Geographically, they're in different markets — Databricks operates out of United States and Patsnap from Singapore.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Databricks | Patsnap |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $134BWINS | $1B |
📈Total Funding | $20.2BWINS | $300M |
📅Founded | 2013WINS | 2007 |
🚀Stage | Private | Series E |
👥Employees | 6,000 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | United States | Singapore |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 93WINS | 80 |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Databricks is valued 134x higher ($134B vs $1B)
Funding gap: Databricks has raised $19.9B more ($20.2B vs $300M)
Market experience: Patsnap has 6 years more (founded 2007 vs 2013)
Growth stage: Databricks is at Private vs Patsnap at Series E
Team size: Databricks has 6,000 employees vs Patsnap's 500-1000
Market base: 🇺🇸 Databricks (United States) vs 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Awaira Score: Databricks scores 93/100 vs Patsnap's 80/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Databricks if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 93/100 vs 80/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($134B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $20.2B
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning
Choose Patsnap if…
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2007
- ✓Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents
Funding History
Databricks raised $20.2B across 5 rounds. Patsnap raised $300M across 1 round.
Databricks
Series E
Aug 2020
Series D
Apr 2019
Series C
Dec 2016
Series B
Jun 2014
Series A
Sep 2013
Lead: Andreessen Horowitz
Patsnap
Series E
Sep 2021
Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Databricks
Unique to Patsnap
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Databricks vs Patsnap
Is Databricks bigger than Patsnap?▾
Which company raised more funding — Databricks or Patsnap?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Databricks vs Patsnap?▾
What does Databricks do vs Patsnap?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Databricks and Patsnap competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Databricks edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 93, but Patsnap (80) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.
Who Should You Watch?
Databricks has the edge right now — higher Awaira Score and more capital to work with. That said, Patsnap could close the gap with the right round or product launch. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.