Databricks vs Patsnap
In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
🇺🇸 United States · Ali Ghodsi
Valuation
$134B
Total Funding
$11.2B
6,000 employees
🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong
Valuation
$1B
Total Funding
$300M
500-1000 employees
Analyst Summary
Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations
Both Databricks and Patsnap compete directly in the AI Data space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents.
Databricks carries a valuation of $134B, which is 134x higher than Patsnap's $1B. On the funding side, Databricks has raised $11.2B in total — $10.9B more than Patsnap's $300M.
Patsnap has 6 years more market experience, having been founded in 2007 compared to Databricks's 2013 founding. In terms of growth stage, Databricks is at Series J while Patsnap is at Series E — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.
Databricks operates out of 🇺🇸 United States while Patsnap is based in 🇸🇬 Singapore, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Databricks leads with a score of 93, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Databricks | Patsnap |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $134BWINS | $1B |
📈Total Funding | $11.2BWINS | $300M |
📅Founded | 2013WINS | 2007 |
🚀Stage | Series J | Series E |
👥Employees | 6,000 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | United States | Singapore |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 93WINS | 80 |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Databricks is valued 134x higher ($134B vs $1B)
Funding gap: Databricks has raised $10.9B more ($11.2B vs $300M)
Market experience: Patsnap has 6 years more (founded 2007 vs 2013)
Growth stage: Databricks is at Series J vs Patsnap at Series E
Team size: Databricks has 6,000 employees vs Patsnap's 500-1000
Market base: 🇺🇸 Databricks (United States) vs 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Awaira Score: Databricks scores 93/100 vs Patsnap's 80/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Databricks if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 93/100 vs 80/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($134B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $11.2B
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning
Choose Patsnap if…
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2007
- ✓Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents
Funding History
Databricks raised $11.2B across 5 rounds. Patsnap raised $300M across 0 rounds.
Databricks
Series E
Aug 2020
Series D
Apr 2019
Series C
Aug 2017
Series B
Oct 2015
Series A
Feb 2014
Lead: Andreessen Horowitz
Patsnap
No public funding data available.
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Databricks