Overall Winner: Databricks·93/ 100

Databricks vs Patsnap

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Winner
D
Databricks

🇺🇸 United States · Ali Ghodsi

Series JAI DataEst. 2013

Valuation

$134B

Total Funding

$11.2B

93
Awaira Score93/100

6,000 employees

Full Databricks Profile →
P
Patsnap

🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong

Series EAI DataEst. 2007

Valuation

$1B

Total Funding

$300M

80
Awaira Score80/100

500-1000 employees

Full Patsnap Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Databricks and Patsnap compete directly in the AI Data space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents.

Databricks carries a valuation of $134B, which is 134x higher than Patsnap's $1B. On the funding side, Databricks has raised $11.2B in total — $10.9B more than Patsnap's $300M.

Patsnap has 6 years more market experience, having been founded in 2007 compared to Databricks's 2013 founding. In terms of growth stage, Databricks is at Series J while Patsnap is at Series E — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Databricks operates out of 🇺🇸 United States while Patsnap is based in 🇸🇬 Singapore, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Databricks leads with a score of 93, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricDatabricksPatsnap
💰Valuation
$134BWINS
$1B
📈Total Funding
$11.2BWINS
$300M
📅Founded
2013WINS
2007
🚀Stage
Series J
Series E
👥Employees
6,000
500-1000
🌍Country
United States
Singapore
🏷️Category
AI Data
AI Data
Awaira Score
93WINS
80

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Databricks is valued 134x higher ($134B vs $1B)

📈

Funding gap: Databricks has raised $10.9B more ($11.2B vs $300M)

📅

Market experience: Patsnap has 6 years more (founded 2007 vs 2013)

🚀

Growth stage: Databricks is at Series J vs Patsnap at Series E

👥

Team size: Databricks has 6,000 employees vs Patsnap's 500-1000

🌍

Market base: 🇺🇸 Databricks (United States) vs 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment

Awaira Score: Databricks scores 93/100 vs Patsnap's 80/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

D

Choose Databricks if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 93/100 vs 80/100
  • More established by valuation ($134B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $11.2B
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning
P

Choose Patsnap if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2007
  • Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents

Funding History

Databricks raised $11.2B across 5 rounds. Patsnap raised $300M across 0 rounds.

Databricks

Series E

Aug 2020

$250M

Series D

Apr 2019

$200M

Series C

Aug 2017

$85M

Series B

Oct 2015

$33M

Series A

Feb 2014

Lead: Andreessen Horowitz

$15M

Patsnap

No public funding data available.

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Databricks

Andreessen HorowitzSequoia CapitalSalesforce Ventures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Databricks vs Patsnap

Is Databricks bigger than Patsnap?
By valuation, Databricks is the larger company at $134B versus $1B — a 134x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Databricks employs 6,000 people while Patsnap has 500-1000 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Databricks or Patsnap?
Databricks has raised more in total funding at $11.2B, compared to Patsnap's $300M — a gap of $10.9B. Combined, the two companies have completed 5 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Databricks holds the higher Awaira Score at 93/100, compared to Patsnap's 80/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 13-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Databricks vs Patsnap?
Databricks was founded by Ali Ghodsi in 2013. Patsnap was founded by Jeffrey Tiong in 2007. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Databricks do vs Patsnap?
Databricks: Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning. The company developed Databricks Lakehouse, which combines data lake and data warehouse capabilities, built on Apache Spark technology. Its platform enables organizations to process large-scale data, build machine learning models, and deploy AI applications through a single interface. The company offers several core products: Databricks SQL for analytics, Databricks Machine Learning for model development, and Databricks Jobs for workflow automation. The platform supports multi-cloud deployment across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Databricks serves enterprises across various industries, with customers including organizations in financial services, technology, and healthcare sectors. As of its latest funding round, Databricks has raised $11.2 billion in total funding and maintains a valuation of $134 billion, positioning it among the highest-valued private AI and data companies. The company achieved Series J funding status, indicating significant capital accumulation and investor confidence. Databricks competes with platforms like Snowflake, Teradata, and cloud-native data solutions from major hyperscalers. The company's growth trajectory reflects strong market demand for integrated data and AI infrastructure, driven by increasing enterprise adoption of machine learning and data-driven decision-making. Databricks unified the traditionally separate data warehouse and data lake approaches through its Lakehouse architecture, creating a single platform for analytics and AI workflows. Patsnap: Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents. The Singapore company integrates patent data with scientific literature and chemical structure databases to provide a comprehensive IP and technology intelligence environment.\n\nThe company raised approximately $300 million including a Series E round from investors including SoftBank Vision Fund 2, Tencent, and CPE Yunji, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. Patsnap serves over 10,000 companies globally including R&D-intensive organisations in pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, automotive, and consumer electronics that use patent landscape analysis to inform technology strategy and investment decisions.\n\nPatsnap competes in the IP analytics market against Derwent Innovation (Clarivate), Questel Orbit, and Minesoft, as well as general enterprise search platforms that include patent data. Its AI capabilities for patent claim analysis, technology trend extraction, and cross-domain IP search differentiate it from traditional Boolean-search patent databases, enabling R&D strategy questions to be answered through AI-assisted analysis rather than manual patent review. The Singapore base provides access to both the Southeast Asian technology market and a sophisticated legal and financial services market for IP monetisation and licensing analytics.
Which company was founded first?
Patsnap was founded first in 2007, giving it 6 years of additional market experience. Databricks was founded later in 2013. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Databricks has approximately 6,000 employees, while Patsnap has approximately 500-1000. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Databricks and Patsnap competitors?
Yes, Databricks and Patsnap are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Data space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.