Databricks vs Weights and Biases
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Databricks is valued at $134B — more than 3x Weights and Biases's $1.3B.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Databricks
5 wins
Weights and Biases
0 wins
Key Numbers
🇺🇸 United States · Ali Ghodsi
Valuation
$134B
Total Funding
$20.2B
6,000 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Lukas Biewald
Valuation
$1.3B
Total Funding
$250M
300 employees
This is a head-to-head contest: both operate in AI Data and share a home market in United States. Different stages (Private vs Acquired) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
In the AI Data market, Databricks and Weights and Biases represent two distinct approaches. Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning. Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development.
Funding & Valuation
Databricks commands a $134B valuation — roughly 107.2x that of Weights and Biases at $1.3B, a gap that underscores their different scales. Databricks has amassed $20.2B in total funding, far exceeding Weights and Biases's $250M.
Growth Stage
Databricks was founded in 2013, 4 years before Weights and Biases arrived in 2017. Growth stages differ: Databricks (Private) versus Weights and Biases (Acquired), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. On headcount, Databricks reports 6,000 employees and Weights and Biases reports 300.
Geography & Outlook
Headquartered in 🇺🇸 United States, both Databricks and Weights and Biases draw from the same local ecosystem of talent and capital. The Awaira Score gives Databricks (93) a notable lead over Weights and Biases (80). Under Ali Ghodsi and Lukas Biewald respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Databricks
Weights and Biases
Funding History
Databricks has completed 5 funding rounds, while Weights and Biases has gone through 5. Databricks's most recent round was a Series E of $250M, compared to Weights and Biases's Series C ($50M). Databricks is at Private while Weights and Biases is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Databricks is significantly larger with about 6,000 employees, compared to Weights and Biases's 300. That's a 20x difference in headcount. Databricks has a 4-year head start, founded in 2013 vs Weights and Biases's 2017. Both are based in United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Databricks | Weights and Biases |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $134BWINS | $1.3B |
📈Total Funding | $20.2BWINS | $250M |
📅Founded | 2013 | 2017WINS |
🚀Stage | Private | Acquired |
👥Employees | 6,000 | 300 |
🌍Country | United States | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 93WINS | 80 |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Databricks is valued 107.2x higher ($134B vs $1.3B)
Funding gap: Databricks has raised $20B more ($20.2B vs $250M)
Market experience: Databricks has 4 years more (founded 2013 vs 2017)
Growth stage: Databricks is at Private vs Weights and Biases at Acquired
Team size: Databricks has 6,000 employees vs Weights and Biases's 300
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Awaira Score: Databricks scores 93/100 vs Weights and Biases's 80/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Databricks if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 93/100 vs 80/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($134B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $20.2B
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2013
- ✓Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning
Choose Weights and Biases if…
- ✓Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development
Funding History
Databricks raised $20.2B across 5 rounds. Weights and Biases raised $250M across 5 rounds.
Databricks
Series E
Aug 2020
Series D
Apr 2019
Series C
Dec 2016
Series B
Jun 2014
Series A
Sep 2013
Lead: Andreessen Horowitz
Weights and Biases
Series C
Aug 2023
Lead: Daniel Gross
Series C
Sep 2022
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series B
Mar 2021
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Apr 2019
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Jan 2018
Lead: Google Ventures
Investor Comparison
Unique to Weights and Biases
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Databricks vs Weights and Biases
Is Databricks bigger than Weights and Biases?▾
Which company raised more funding — Databricks or Weights and Biases?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Databricks vs Weights and Biases?▾
What does Databricks do vs Weights and Biases?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Databricks and Weights and Biases competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Databricks edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 93, but Weights and Biases (80) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.
Who Should You Watch?
Databricks has the edge right now — higher Awaira Score and more capital to work with. That said, Weights and Biases could close the gap with the right round or product launch. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.