Skip to main content

Deep Genomics vs Butterfly Network

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Butterfly Network is valued at $957M — more than 3x Deep Genomics's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Butterfly Network leads on 4 of 4 metrics

Deep Genomics

0 wins

-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Butterfly Network

4 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$957M
Total Funding
$180M
$370M
Awaira Score
68/100
85/100
Employees
100-500
500-1000
Founded
2015
2011
Stage
Series C
Public
Deep GenomicsButterfly Network
Deep Genomics logo
Deep Genomics

🇨🇦 Canada · Brendan Frey

Series CAI HealthcareEst. 2015

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$180M

Awaira Score68/100

100-500 employees

Full Deep Genomics Profile →
Winner
Butterfly Network logo
Butterfly Network

🇺🇸 United States · John Martin

PublicAI HealthcareEst. 2011

Valuation

$957M

Total Funding

$370M

Awaira Score85/100

500-1000 employees

Full Butterfly Network Profile →
Market Context

As AI Healthcare players, Deep Genomics and Butterfly Network target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Deep Genomics at Series C vs Butterfly Network at Public — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

The AI Healthcare sector features both Deep Genomics and Butterfly Network as key players. Deep Genomics applies deep learning to genetic medicine discovery, using AI models trained on genomic sequence data to predict the functional consequences of genetic variants, identify RNA splicing defects that underlie genetic diseases, and generate novel therapeutic candidates including antisense oligonucleotides and small molecules that correct disease-causing genetic variants. Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging.

Funding & Valuation

Butterfly Network carries a disclosed valuation of $957M, while Deep Genomics remains privately valued. In aggregate funding, Butterfly Network edges ahead at $370M versus Deep Genomics's $180M.

Growth Stage

The founding gap is narrow: Butterfly Network in 2011 versus Deep Genomics in 2015. Deep Genomics is at Series C while Butterfly Network stands at Public, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. On headcount, Deep Genomics reports 100-500 employees and Butterfly Network reports 500-1000.

Geography & Outlook

Deep Genomics operates out of 🇨🇦 Canada while Butterfly Network is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, Butterfly Network leads decisively at 85 compared to Deep Genomics's 68. Deep Genomics, led by Brendan Frey, and Butterfly Network, led by John Martin, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

Deep Genomics

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$180M

Butterfly Network

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$74M
Funding Span5.3 yrs

Funding History

Deep Genomics has completed 1 funding round, while Butterfly Network has gone through 5. Deep Genomics's most recent round was a Series C of $180M, compared to Butterfly Network's Series D ($148M). Deep Genomics is at Series C while Butterfly Network is at Public — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Butterfly Network has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 5x the size of Deep Genomics's 100-500. Butterfly Network has a 4-year head start, founded in 2011 vs Deep Genomics's 2015. Geographically, they're in different markets — Deep Genomics operates out of Canada and Butterfly Network from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricDeep GenomicsButterfly Network
💰Valuation
N/A
$957M
📈Total Funding
$180M
$370MWINS
📅Founded
2015WINS
2011
🚀Stage
Series C
Public
👥Employees
100-500
500-1000
🌍Country
Canada
United States
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
68
85WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Butterfly Network has raised $190M more ($370M vs $180M)

📅

Market experience: Butterfly Network has 4 years more (founded 2011 vs 2015)

🚀

Growth stage: Deep Genomics is at Series C vs Butterfly Network at Public

👥

Team size: Deep Genomics has 100-500 employees vs Butterfly Network's 500-1000

🌍

Market base: 🇨🇦 Deep Genomics (Canada) vs 🇺🇸 Butterfly Network (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Awaira Score: Butterfly Network scores 85/100 vs Deep Genomics's 68/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Deep Genomics logo

Choose Deep Genomics if…

  • Canada-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Deep Genomics applies deep learning to genetic medicine discovery, using AI models trained on genomic sequence data to predict the functional consequences of genetic variants, identify RNA splicing defects that underlie genetic diseases, and generate novel therapeutic candidates including antisense oligonucleotides and small molecules that correct disease-causing genetic variants
Butterfly Network logo

Choose Butterfly Network if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 68/100
  • More established by valuation ($957M)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $370M
  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging

Funding History

Deep Genomics raised $180M across 1 round. Butterfly Network raised $370M across 5 rounds.

Deep Genomics

Series C

Feb 2023

Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2

$180M

Butterfly Network

Series D

Oct 2016

$148M

Series C

Jun 2015

$114.7M

Series B

Feb 2014

$66.6M

Series A

Oct 2012

$29.6M

Seed

Jun 2011

$11.1M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Deep Genomics

SoftBank Vision Fund 2Canada Pension Plan

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Deep Genomics vs Butterfly Network

Is Deep Genomics bigger than Butterfly Network?
Butterfly Network has a disclosed valuation of $957M, while Deep Genomics's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Butterfly Network employs 500-1000 people.
Which company raised more funding — Deep Genomics or Butterfly Network?
Butterfly Network has raised more in total funding at $370M, compared to Deep Genomics's $180M — a gap of $190M. Combined, the two companies have completed 6 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Butterfly Network leads with an Awaira Score of 85/100, while Deep Genomics sits at 68/100. That 17-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Deep Genomics vs Butterfly Network?
Deep Genomics was founded by Brendan Frey in 2015. Butterfly Network was founded by John Martin in 2011. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Deep Genomics do vs Butterfly Network?
Deep Genomics: Deep Genomics applies deep learning to genetic medicine discovery, using AI models trained on genomic sequence data to predict the functional consequences of genetic variants, identify RNA splicing defects that underlie genetic diseases, and generate novel therapeutic candidates including antisense oligonucleotides and small molecules that correct disease-causing genetic variants. The Toronto company was founded by Brendan Frey, a University of Toronto machine learning professor who collaborated with Geoffrey Hinton on deep learning research.\n\nThe company raised approximately $180 million in venture funding from investors including True Ventures, AlleyCorp, and GV (Google Ventures). Deep Genomics has built an AI drug discovery platform called the AI Workbench that integrates genomic data, disease biology, and AI prediction across the therapeutic discovery pipeline, and has entered a strategic alliance with Agenus to develop cancer treatments using its AI-designed oligonucleotide candidates.\n\nDeep Genomics competes in the AI genetic medicine space against Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Insitro, Exscientia, and gene therapy companies building computational biology capabilities. Its specific focus on RNA biology and oligonucleotide therapeutics, which represent a growing class of approved genetic medicines, differentiates it from platforms focused on small molecule drug discovery or cell therapy. The Toronto University of Toronto AI ecosystem, including connections to the Vector Institute and the Hinton research lineage, provides research credibility and talent access that distinguishes Canadian AI drug discovery from international competitors. Butterfly Network: Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging. The AI software layer provides real-time image interpretation guidance, enabling clinicians with limited ultrasound training to perform diagnostic scans at the bedside.\n\nThe company is publicly traded on the NYSE under the ticker BFLY and raised over 700 million USD prior to and through its public listing. Butterfly has deployed devices across hospitals, emergency rooms, and point-of-care settings in over 50 countries, with particular penetration in resource-limited healthcare settings where traditional ultrasound equipment is prohibitively expensive or unavailable.\n\nPortable AI-assisted diagnostic imaging represents a structural shift in how and where medical imaging is performed. Butterfly Network has created a defensible position through its proprietary chip architecture, which competitors cannot easily replicate, and through its growing library of AI-assisted clinical guidance tools. The transition from hospital-based imaging to point-of-care diagnostics powered by AI guidance is a multi-decade trend that positions Butterfly at the center of a fundamental change in diagnostic medicine. Butterfly Network operates in the AI Healthcare sector and is headquartered in United States. Founded in 2011 by John Martin, Butterfly Network has raised $370M in total funding, achieving a valuation of $957M as of its latest round. The company's funding journey includes a Seed of $11.1M in 2011, a Series A of $29.6M in 2012, a Series B of $66.6M in 2014, a Series C of $114.7M in 2015, a Series D of $148M in 2016. With approximately 500-1000 employees, Butterfly Network has established itself as a Public-stage player in the AI Healthcare market. The company holds an Awaira Score of 85/100, reflecting its strong position across valuation, funding trajectory, team scale, and market influence. Butterfly Network competes in a rapidly evolving segment alongside other AI Healthcare companies. Based in United States, Butterfly Network is part of a growing international AI ecosystem attracting talent and investment. The AI Healthcare space has attracted significant investment in recent years, with companies racing to capture enterprise and consumer demand for AI-powered solutions.
Which company was founded first?
Butterfly Network got there first, launching in 2011 — that's 4 years of extra runway. Deep Genomics didn't arrive until 2015. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Deep Genomics has about 100-500 employees; Butterfly Network has about 500-1000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Deep Genomics and Butterfly Network competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Deep Genomics and Butterfly Network compete in AI Healthcare, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Butterfly Network has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 85 vs Deep Genomics's 68. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.

Who Should You Watch?

Butterfly Network is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Deep Genomics has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive