Overall Winner: Tempus·84/ 100
VS
T
TempusWinner

Dozee vs Tempus

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

D
Dozee

🇮🇳 India · Mudit Dandwate

Series BAI HealthcareEst. 2015

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$20M

60
Awaira Score60/100

50-200 employees

Full Dozee Profile →
Winner
T
Tempus

🇺🇸 United States · Eric Lefkofsky

PublicAI HealthcareEst. 2015

Valuation

$8.1B

Total Funding

$1.3B

84
Awaira Score84/100

2500 employees

Full Tempus Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Dozee and Tempus compete directly in the AI Healthcare space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Dozee builds a contactless remote patient monitoring system that uses a ballistocardiography sensor placed under a mattress to continuously track heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure trends, and sleep quality, transmitting data to an AI analysis platform that generates clinical-grade early warning scores for hospital staff. Tempus is an AI-driven oncology and precision medicine company founded in 2015 that leverages machine learning and data analysis to improve cancer treatment outcomes.

Tempus carries a known valuation of $8.1B, while Dozee's valuation has not been publicly disclosed. On the funding side, Tempus has raised $1.3B in total — $1.3B more than Dozee's $20M.

Both companies were founded in 2015, giving them the same market tenure. In terms of growth stage, Dozee is at Series B while Tempus is at Public — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Dozee operates out of 🇮🇳 India while Tempus is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Tempus leads with a score of 84, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricDozeeTempus
💰Valuation
N/A
$8.1B
📈Total Funding
$20M
$1.3BWINS
📅Founded
2015
2015
🚀Stage
Series B
Public
👥Employees
50-200
2500
🌍Country
India
United States
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
60
84WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Tempus has raised $1.3B more ($1.3B vs $20M)

🚀

Growth stage: Dozee is at Series B vs Tempus at Public

👥

Team size: Dozee has 50-200 employees vs Tempus's 2500

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇳 Dozee (India) vs 🇺🇸 Tempus (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Awaira Score: Tempus scores 84/100 vs Dozee's 60/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

D

Choose Dozee if…

  • India-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Dozee builds a contactless remote patient monitoring system that uses a ballistocardiography sensor placed under a mattress to continuously track heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure trends, and sleep quality, transmitting data to an AI analysis platform that generates clinical-grade early warning scores for hospital staff
T

Choose Tempus if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 84/100 vs 60/100
  • More established by valuation ($8.1B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $1.3B
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Tempus is an AI-driven oncology and precision medicine company founded in 2015 that leverages machine learning and data analysis to improve cancer treatment outcomes

Funding History

Dozee raised $20M across 0 rounds. Tempus raised $1.3B across 5 rounds.

Dozee

No public funding data available.

Tempus

IPO

Jul 2021

Series D

Jan 2021

$175M

Series C

Jan 2019

$110M

Series B

Jan 2017

$45M

Series A

Jan 2016

$30M

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Dozee vs Tempus

Is Dozee bigger than Tempus?
Tempus has a disclosed valuation of $8.1B, while Dozee's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Tempus employs 2500 people.
Which company raised more funding — Dozee or Tempus?
Tempus has raised more in total funding at $1.3B, compared to Dozee's $20M — a gap of $1.3B. Combined, the two companies have completed 5 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Tempus holds the higher Awaira Score at 84/100, compared to Dozee's 60/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 24-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Dozee vs Tempus?
Dozee was founded by Mudit Dandwate in 2015. Tempus was founded by Eric Lefkofsky in 2015. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Dozee do vs Tempus?
Dozee: Dozee builds a contactless remote patient monitoring system that uses a ballistocardiography sensor placed under a mattress to continuously track heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure trends, and sleep quality, transmitting data to an AI analysis platform that generates clinical-grade early warning scores for hospital staff. The system requires no wearables or patient cooperation, enabling continuous monitoring for elderly patients, post-surgical recovery, and ICU step-down units.\n\nThe company raised approximately $20M in Series B funding and has deployed its monitoring systems across hospitals in India and internationally, with evidence of measurable reductions in deterioration events and ICU transfers through early warning. Dozee's central monitoring dashboard allows nursing staff to oversee multiple patients simultaneously with automated deterioration alerts.\n\nContinuous patient monitoring outside of ICU settings is an underserved clinical problem globally, and particularly acute in India where nurse-to-patient ratios in general wards are often insufficient for manual vital sign monitoring. Dozee's contactless approach and AI early warning capability address both the clinical quality and resource efficiency dimensions of this challenge. Tempus: Tempus is an AI-driven oncology and precision medicine company founded in 2015 that leverages machine learning and data analysis to improve cancer treatment outcomes. The platform aggregates and analyzes vast datasets including clinical data, imaging, molecular information, and outcomes to identify personalized treatment strategies for cancer patients. Tempus's core technology uses artificial intelligence to match patient-specific tumor characteristics with optimal therapeutic options, enabling oncologists to make data-informed treatment decisions. The company operates primarily in the United States and serves hospitals, health systems, and oncology practices through its cloud-based platform. Its applications span multiple cancer types including lung, colorectal, breast, and ovarian cancers. Tempus has secured $1.3 billion in total funding and achieved a valuation of $8.1 billion, reflecting significant investor confidence in precision oncology. The company went public, transitioning from private to public markets. Tempus competes with other AI health platforms and precision medicine companies like Foundation Medicine and others focused on genomic analysis and treatment selection. The company's growth trajectory reflects expanding adoption of AI-driven oncology tools and increasing demand for personalized cancer treatment protocols. Its competitive positioning centers on its data infrastructure scale and machine learning capabilities applied to complex clinical decision-making. Tempus combines clinical, imaging, and molecular data through AI to provide real-time oncology treatment recommendations at scale across U.S. health systems.
Which company was founded first?
Both Dozee and Tempus were founded in the same year — 2015. Despite sharing a founding year, they may have launched at different times within that year, which can matter in fast-moving AI markets.
Which company has more employees?
Dozee has approximately 50-200 employees, while Tempus has approximately 2500. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Dozee and Tempus competitors?
Yes, Dozee and Tempus are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Healthcare space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.