Skip to main content
Overall Winner: Casetext·75/ 100

Everlaw vs Casetext

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Everlaw is valued at $2B — more than 3x Casetext's $650M.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Everlaw leads on 4 of 5 metrics

Everlaw

4 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
-Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Casetext

1 win

-Valuation
-Funding
+Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience
Everlaw logo
Everlaw

🇺🇸 United States · AJ Shankar

Series DAI LegalEst. 2010

Valuation

$2B

Total Funding

$517M

Awaira Score71/100

525 employees

Full Everlaw Profile →
Winner
Casetext logo
Casetext

🇺🇸 United States · Jake Heller

AcquiredAI LegalEst. 2013

Valuation

$650M

Total Funding

$64M

Awaira Score75/100

120 employees

Full Casetext Profile →
Market Context

This is a head-to-head contest: both operate in AI Legal and share a home market in United States. Different stages (Series D vs Acquired) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

In the AI Legal market, Everlaw and Casetext represent two distinct approaches. Everlaw is an AI-powered legal technology platform founded in 2010 that specializes in e-discovery, document review, and litigation support. Casetext is an AI-powered legal research and document automation platform founded in 2013.

Market pricing favors Everlaw at $2B, a 3.1x premium over Casetext's $650M mark. On the funding front, Everlaw has secured $517M, outpacing Casetext's $64M by $453M.

Everlaw was founded in 2010, 3 years before Casetext arrived in 2013. Everlaw is at Series D while Casetext stands at Acquired, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Team sizes also differ: Everlaw employs 525 people versus Casetext's 120.

Headquartered in 🇺🇸 United States, both Everlaw and Casetext draw from the same local ecosystem of talent and capital. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, the gap is minimal — Everlaw scores 71 and Casetext scores 75. Under AJ Shankar and Jake Heller respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Key Numbers

Valuation
$2B
$650M
Total Funding
$517M
$64M
Awaira Score
71/100
75/100
Employees
525
120
Founded
2010
2013
Stage
Series D
Acquired
EverlawCasetext

Funding Velocity

Everlaw

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round SizeN/A
Funding Span6 yrs

Casetext

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$21.3M
Funding Span4.4 yrs

Funding History

Everlaw has completed 3 funding rounds, while Casetext has gone through 3. Everlaw's most recent round was a Series C, compared to Casetext's Series C ($36M). Everlaw is at Series D while Casetext is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Everlaw is significantly larger with about 525 employees, compared to Casetext's 120. That's a 4x difference in headcount. Everlaw has a 3-year head start, founded in 2010 vs Casetext's 2013. Both are based in United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricEverlawCasetext
💰Valuation
$2BWINS
$650M
📈Total Funding
$517MWINS
$64M
📅Founded
2010
2013WINS
🚀Stage
Series D
Acquired
👥Employees
525
120
🌍Country
United States
United States
🏷️Category
AI Legal
AI Legal
Awaira Score
71
75WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Everlaw is valued 3.1x higher ($2B vs $650M)

📈

Funding gap: Everlaw has raised $453M more ($517M vs $64M)

📅

Market experience: Everlaw has 3 years more (founded 2010 vs 2013)

🚀

Growth stage: Everlaw is at Series D vs Casetext at Acquired

👥

Team size: Everlaw has 525 employees vs Casetext's 120

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Legal market segment

Awaira Score: Casetext scores 75/100 vs Everlaw's 71/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Everlaw logo

Choose Everlaw if…

  • More established by valuation ($2B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $517M
  • More market experience — founded in 2010
  • Everlaw is an AI-powered legal technology platform founded in 2010 that specializes in e-discovery, document review, and litigation support
Casetext logo

Choose Casetext if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 75/100 vs 71/100
  • Casetext is an AI-powered legal research and document automation platform founded in 2013

Funding History

Everlaw raised $517M across 3 rounds. Casetext raised $64M across 3 rounds.

Everlaw

Series C

Jan 2018

Series B

Jan 2014

Series A

Jan 2012

Casetext

Series C

Jun 2021

Lead: Menlo Ventures

$36M

Series B

Sep 2018

$13M

Series A

Jan 2017

Lead: Greycroft

$15M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Casetext

Menlo VenturesGreycroft

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Everlaw vs Casetext

Is Everlaw bigger than Casetext?
By valuation, Everlaw is the larger company at $2B versus $650M — a 3.1x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Everlaw employs 525 people while Casetext has 120 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Everlaw or Casetext?
Everlaw has raised more in total funding at $517M, compared to Casetext's $64M — a gap of $453M. Combined, the two companies have completed 6 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Casetext leads with an Awaira Score of 75/100, while Everlaw sits at 71/100. That 4-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Everlaw vs Casetext?
Everlaw was founded by AJ Shankar in 2010. Casetext was founded by Jake Heller in 2013. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Everlaw do vs Casetext?
Everlaw: Everlaw is an AI-powered legal technology platform founded in 2010 that specializes in e-discovery, document review, and litigation support. The company provides software solutions that use artificial intelligence and machine learning to help legal teams manage large volumes of documents, identify relevant evidence, and streamline the discovery process in litigation and investigations. Everlaw's platform enables lawyers to conduct predictive coding, automated categorization, and advanced search across complex document repositories, reducing time and costs associated with traditional manual review. The company serves law firms, corporate legal departments, and government agencies handling complex litigation matters. Everlaw has achieved a $2.0 billion valuation following $517 million in total funding through Series D stage, positioning it as a significant player in the legal AI sector. The platform competes with established e-discovery providers and emerging legal tech companies offering AI-driven document analysis. Everlaw's growth trajectory reflects increasing demand for AI solutions in legal services, particularly as litigation volumes grow and cost pressures mount on legal departments. The company's focus on accessibility and user experience has contributed to its market traction among both large enterprises and mid-market legal organizations. Its continued funding rounds support product development and market expansion. Everlaw combines enterprise-grade e-discovery capabilities with accessible AI-driven document intelligence for diverse legal market segments. Casetext: Casetext is an AI-powered legal research and document automation platform founded in 2013. The company develops software that assists legal professionals with legal research, contract analysis, and document drafting through machine learning and natural language processing technologies. Its flagship product, CoCounsel, is an AI legal assistant that helps attorneys perform legal research, due diligence, and document review more efficiently. The platform integrates generative AI capabilities to analyze case law, statutes, and legal documents, enabling lawyers to reduce time spent on routine tasks and focus on higher-value work. Casetext positions itself in the legal AI market alongside competitors like LexisNexis, Westlaw, and newer entrants focused on AI-assisted legal work. The company has built its technology on proprietary legal databases and machine learning models trained on legal content. Its customer base includes law firms, in-house legal departments, and corporate legal teams seeking to modernize their research and document workflows. Founded with $64M in total funding, Casetext achieved a $700M valuation before being acquired, demonstrating significant growth in the legal technology sector. The acquisition reflects the increasing consolidation in legal AI as larger players and investors recognize the market opportunity. The company represents broader trends toward AI adoption in professional services, particularly in knowledge-intensive industries like law. Casetext pioneered accessible AI-assisted legal research for attorneys by combining generative AI with specialized legal training data.
Which company was founded first?
Everlaw got there first, launching in 2010 — that's 3 years of extra runway. Casetext didn't arrive until 2013. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Everlaw has about 525 employees; Casetext has about 120. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Everlaw and Casetext competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Everlaw and Casetext compete in AI Legal, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

It's close. Both Everlaw and Casetext are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.

Who Should You Watch?

This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive