Skip to main content
Overall Winner: Fireworks AI·82/ 100

Fireworks AI vs Baseten

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Two AI Infrastructure companies going head to head.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Baseten leads on 3 of 5 metrics

Fireworks AI

1 win

-Valuation
-Funding
+Awaira Score
=Team Size
-Experience

Baseten

3 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
-Awaira Score
=Team Size
+Experience
Winner
Fireworks AI logo
Fireworks AI

🇺🇸 United States · Lin Qiao

Series CAI InfrastructureEst. 2022

Valuation

$4B

Total Funding

$327M

Awaira Score82/100

150 employees

Full Fireworks AI Profile →
Baseten logo
Baseten

🇺🇸 United States · Tuhin Srivastava

Series EAI InfrastructureEst. 2019

Valuation

$5B

Total Funding

$585M

Awaira Score80/100

150 employees

Full Baseten Profile →
Market Context

Fireworks AI and Baseten are both AI Infrastructure companies based in United States, making this a direct domestic rivalry. The stage gap — Fireworks AI at Series C vs Baseten at Series E — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

The AI Infrastructure sector features both Fireworks AI and Baseten as key players. Fireworks AI, founded in 2022, develops infrastructure software for deploying and running large language models (LLMs) in production environments. Baseten is an AI infrastructure company that provides a platform for deploying, scaling, and managing machine learning models in production.

Neither company has a decisive valuation edge: Fireworks AI at $4B and Baseten at $5B. Funding totals are closer: Baseten at $585M compared to Fireworks AI's $327M.

The founding gap is narrow: Baseten in 2019 versus Fireworks AI in 2022. Fireworks AI is at Series C while Baseten stands at Series E, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Headcount tells a story too: Fireworks AI has 150 employees and Baseten has 150.

Both companies are headquartered in 🇺🇸 United States, competing for the same regional talent pool and customer base. The Awaira Score reflects a tight race: 82 for Fireworks AI versus 80 for Baseten. Fireworks AI, led by Lin Qiao, and Baseten, led by Tuhin Srivastava, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Key Numbers

Valuation
$4B
$5B
Total Funding
$327M
$585M
Awaira Score
82/100
80/100
Employees
150
150
Founded
2022
2019
Stage
Series C
Series E
Fireworks AIBaseten

Funding Velocity

Fireworks AI

Total Rounds2
Avg. Round Size$38.5M
Funding Span0.3 yrs

Baseten

Total Rounds6
Avg. Round Size$88.6M
Funding Span4.1 yrs

Funding History

Fireworks AI has completed 2 funding rounds, while Baseten has gone through 6. Fireworks AI's most recent round was a Series B of $52M, compared to Baseten's Series C ($75M). Fireworks AI is at Series C while Baseten is at Series E — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Fireworks AI has about 150 people and Baseten has around 150. Baseten has a 3-year head start, founded in 2019 vs Fireworks AI's 2022. Both are based in United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricFireworks AIBaseten
💰Valuation
$4B
$5BWINS
📈Total Funding
$327M
$585MWINS
📅Founded
2022WINS
2019
🚀Stage
Series C
Series E
👥Employees
150
150
🌍Country
United States
United States
🏷️Category
AI Infrastructure
AI Infrastructure
Awaira Score
82WINS
80

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Baseten is valued 1.3x higher ($5B vs $4B)

📈

Funding gap: Baseten has raised $258M more ($585M vs $327M)

📅

Market experience: Baseten has 3 years more (founded 2019 vs 2022)

🚀

Growth stage: Fireworks AI is at Series C vs Baseten at Series E

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Infrastructure market segment

Awaira Score: Fireworks AI scores 82/100 vs Baseten's 80/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Fireworks AI logo

Choose Fireworks AI if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 82/100 vs 80/100
  • Fireworks AI, founded in 2022, develops infrastructure software for deploying and running large language models (LLMs) in production environments
Baseten logo

Choose Baseten if…

  • More established by valuation ($5B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $585M
  • More market experience — founded in 2019
  • Baseten is an AI infrastructure company that provides a platform for deploying, scaling, and managing machine learning models in production

Funding History

Fireworks AI raised $327M across 2 rounds. Baseten raised $585M across 6 rounds.

Fireworks AI

Series B

Jul 2024

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$52M

Series A

Mar 2024

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$25M

Baseten

Series C

Feb 2025

$75M

Series B

Mar 2024

$40M

Series E

Jan 2024

$245M

Series D

Jan 2023

$150M

Series A

Jan 2023

Lead: Accel

$13.5M

Seed

Jan 2021

$8M

Investor Comparison

Shared Investors1
Sequoia Capital

Unique to Fireworks AI

Gradient VenturesSoftBank Vision Fund

Unique to Baseten

Accel

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Fireworks AI vs Baseten

Is Fireworks AI bigger than Baseten?
By valuation, Baseten is the larger company at $5B versus $4B — a 1.3x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Fireworks AI employs 150 people while Baseten has 150 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Fireworks AI or Baseten?
Baseten has raised more in total funding at $585M, compared to Fireworks AI's $327M — a gap of $258M. Combined, the two companies have completed 8 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Fireworks AI leads with an Awaira Score of 82/100, while Baseten sits at 80/100. That 2-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Fireworks AI vs Baseten?
Fireworks AI was founded by Lin Qiao in 2022. Baseten was founded by Tuhin Srivastava in 2019. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Fireworks AI do vs Baseten?
Fireworks AI: Fireworks AI, founded in 2022, develops infrastructure software for deploying and running large language models (LLMs) in production environments. The company provides a platform that enables organizations to deploy, fine-tune, and optimize open-source and proprietary models with reduced latency and cost. Fireworks AI's core offering focuses on inference acceleration, allowing enterprises to serve LLMs efficiently at scale through specialized hardware optimization and software acceleration techniques. The platform supports multiple model architectures and enables customization for specific use cases, including content generation, summarization, and code completion. The company has secured $327M in total funding at a $4.0B valuation as of Series C, reflecting significant investor confidence in AI infrastructure. Fireworks AI operates in a competitive segment alongside providers like Together AI, Modal, and cloud-based solutions from major vendors. The company targets enterprises seeking to reduce operational costs associated with LLM deployment while maintaining performance control and data privacy. Its position reflects broader market trends toward distributed AI infrastructure and the need for cost-efficient model serving solutions. The infrastructure layer Fireworks occupies addresses a critical gap between model development and production deployment, supporting the growing adoption of generative AI across industries. Fireworks AI specializes in inference optimization infrastructure, enabling cost-effective production deployment of large language models for enterprise customers. Baseten: Baseten is an AI infrastructure company that provides a platform for deploying, scaling, and managing machine learning models in production. Founded in 2019, the company offers a serverless computing environment specifically designed for AI workloads, enabling developers and organizations to run large language models and other AI applications without managing underlying infrastructure. The platform handles model serving, auto-scaling, and resource optimization, abstracting away operational complexity. Baseten supports various model types and frameworks, allowing users to deploy custom models or utilize pre-built solutions. The company targets enterprises and developers requiring reliable, scalable inference infrastructure for AI applications. Its technology stack emphasizes performance optimization and cost efficiency for computationally intensive AI workloads. Baseten has secured $585 million in total funding, achieving a $5.0 billion valuation, positioning it among well-capitalized AI infrastructure providers. The company operates in a competitive landscape alongside similar platforms offering model deployment and inference services. Its growth trajectory reflects increasing enterprise demand for managed AI infrastructure solutions as organizations accelerate AI adoption. The Series E funding stage indicates maturity and substantial market validation. Baseten competes with other infrastructure providers offering model serving capabilities, differentiated through its focus on ease of use and performance optimization for production AI workloads. Baseten addresses the critical infrastructure gap between AI model development and reliable production deployment at scale.
Which company was founded first?
Baseten got there first, launching in 2019 — that's 3 years of extra runway. Fireworks AI didn't arrive until 2022. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Both Fireworks AI and Baseten report about 150 employees. Team size is a rough proxy for scale, but lean AI companies routinely punch above their headcount.
Are Fireworks AI and Baseten competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Fireworks AI and Baseten compete in AI Infrastructure, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

It's close. Both Fireworks AI and Baseten are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.

Who Should You Watch?

This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive