Skip to main content
Overall Winner: Nebius·84/ 100
VS
N
NebiusWinner

Groq vs Nebius

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Two AI Infrastructure companies going head to head.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Nebius leads on 4 of 5 metrics

Groq

1 win

-Valuation
-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
+Experience

Nebius

4 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
-Experience
Groq logo
Groq

🇺🇸 United States · Jonathan Ross

AcquiredAI InfrastructureEst. 2016

Valuation

$20B

Total Funding

$1.4B

Awaira Score80/100

300 employees

Full Groq Profile →
Winner
N
Nebius

🇳🇱 Netherlands

PrivateAI InfrastructureEst. 2023

Valuation

$25B

Total Funding

$2B

Awaira Score84/100

1,000 employees

Full Nebius Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Infrastructure space, though from different geographies — Groq in United States and Nebius in Netherlands. Different stages (Acquired vs Private) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Groq and Nebius are direct competitors in AI Infrastructure. Groq is an AI infrastructure company founded in 2016 that designs and manufactures specialized processors for artificial intelligence workloads. Nebius is a Dutch AI infrastructure company that provides full-stack AI cloud computing services, from GPU clusters to managed machine learning platforms.

The two trade at comparable valuations — Nebius at $25B versus Groq at $20B. Both have attracted significant capital — Nebius with $2B and Groq with $1.4B.

Groq (est. 2016) predates Nebius (est. 2023) by 7 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Stage-wise, Groq is classified as Acquired and Nebius as Private, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. Headcount tells a story too: Groq has 300 employees and Nebius has 1,000.

Groq operates out of 🇺🇸 United States while Nebius is based in 🇳🇱 Netherlands, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, the gap is minimal — Groq scores 80 and Nebius scores 84. Investors and analysts will want to watch how both companies execute over the coming quarters.

Key Numbers

Valuation
$20B
$25B
Total Funding
$1.4B
$2B
Awaira Score
80/100
84/100
Employees
300
1,000
Founded
2016
2023
Stage
Acquired
Private
GroqNebius

Funding Velocity

Groq

Total Rounds4
Avg. Round Size$205M
Funding Span4.7 yrs

Nebius

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$2B

Funding History

Groq has completed 4 funding rounds, while Nebius has gone through 1. Groq's most recent round was a Series D of $450M, compared to Nebius's Strategic ($2B). Groq is at Acquired while Nebius is at Private — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Nebius has the bigger team at roughly 1,000 people — 3x the size of Groq's 300. Groq has a 7-year head start, founded in 2016 vs Nebius's 2023. Geographically, they're in different markets — Groq operates out of United States and Nebius from Netherlands.

Metrics Comparison

MetricGroqNebius
💰Valuation
$20B
$25BWINS
📈Total Funding
$1.4B
$2BWINS
📅Founded
2016
2023WINS
🚀Stage
Acquired
Private
👥Employees
300
1,000
🌍Country
United States
Netherlands
🏷️Category
AI Infrastructure
AI Infrastructure
Awaira Score
80
84WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Nebius is valued 1.3x higher ($25B vs $20B)

📈

Funding gap: Nebius has raised $610M more ($2B vs $1.4B)

📅

Market experience: Groq has 7 years more (founded 2016 vs 2023)

🚀

Growth stage: Groq is at Acquired vs Nebius at Private

👥

Team size: Groq has 300 employees vs Nebius's 1,000

🌍

Market base: 🇺🇸 Groq (United States) vs 🇳🇱 Nebius (Netherlands)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Infrastructure market segment

Awaira Score: Nebius scores 84/100 vs Groq's 80/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Groq logo

Choose Groq if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2016
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Groq is an AI infrastructure company founded in 2016 that designs and manufactures specialized processors for artificial intelligence workloads
N

Choose Nebius if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 84/100 vs 80/100
  • More established by valuation ($25B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $2B
  • Netherlands-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Nebius is a Dutch AI infrastructure company that provides full-stack AI cloud computing services, from GPU clusters to managed machine learning platforms

Funding History

Groq raised $1.4B across 4 rounds. Nebius raised $2B across 1 round.

Groq

Series D

Oct 2023

Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2

$450M

Series C

Apr 2021

Lead: Menlo Ventures

$300M

Series B

Jan 2021

Lead: Sapphire Ventures

$40M

Series A

Jan 2019

$30M

Nebius

Strategic

Mar 2026

Lead: NVIDIA

$2B

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Groq

SoftBank Vision Fund 2Tiger GlobalFoundry GroupMenlo VenturesSapphire VenturesLerer Hippeau

Unique to Nebius

NVIDIA

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Groq vs Nebius

Is Groq bigger than Nebius?
By valuation, Nebius is the larger company at $25B versus $20B — a 1.3x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Groq employs 300 people while Nebius has 1,000 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Groq or Nebius?
Nebius has raised more in total funding at $2B, compared to Groq's $1.4B — a gap of $610M. Combined, the two companies have completed 5 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Nebius leads with an Awaira Score of 84/100, while Groq sits at 80/100. That 4-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Groq vs Nebius?
Groq was founded by Jonathan Ross in 2016. Nebius's founder information is not currently available in our database.
What does Groq do vs Nebius?
Groq: Groq is an AI infrastructure company founded in 2016 that designs and manufactures specialized processors for artificial intelligence workloads. The company's core product is the Language Processing Unit (LPU), a custom-built chip architecture optimized for inference tasks in large language models and other AI applications. Unlike traditional GPUs designed for general-purpose computing, Groq's LPUs prioritize deterministic latency and throughput for sequential AI processing, enabling faster token generation in inference scenarios. Groq has positioned itself as an alternative to NVIDIA's GPU-dominated infrastructure market, targeting enterprises requiring high-performance AI inference at scale. The company offers cloud-based access to its hardware through GroqCloud, allowing developers to run inference workloads with reduced latency compared to conventional GPU implementations. Groq operates in the competitive AI infrastructure sector, competing with established players like NVIDIA, as well as emerging alternatives including custom chip manufacturers and cloud providers developing proprietary AI accelerators. In December 2025, Nvidia and Groq announced an agreement reportedly valued at approximately $20 billion to license Groq's AI inference technology. Groq's growth trajectory reflects increasing enterprise demand for efficient inference infrastructure. Groq's LPU architecture specifically optimizes for inference latency rather than training, addressing a distinct performance bottleneck in deployed AI systems. Groq operates in the AI Infrastructure sector and is headquartered in United States. Founded in 2016 by Jonathan Ross, Groq has raised $1.4B in total funding, achieving a valuation of $20B as of its latest round. The company's funding journey includes a Series A of $30M in 2019, a Series B of $40M in 2021, a Series C of $300M in 2021, a Series D of $450M in 2023. The most recent round was led by SoftBank Vision Fund 2. With approximately 300 employees, Groq has established itself as a Acquired-stage player in the AI Infrastructure market. The company holds an Awaira Score of 80/100, reflecting its strong position across valuation, funding trajectory, team scale, and market influence. Groq competes in a rapidly evolving segment alongside other AI Infrastructure companies. Based in United States, Groq is part of a growing international AI ecosystem attracting talent and investment. The AI Infrastructure space has attracted significant investment in recent years, with companies racing to capture enterprise and consumer demand for AI-powered solutions. Nebius: Nebius is a Dutch AI infrastructure company that provides full-stack AI cloud computing services, from GPU clusters to managed machine learning platforms. Originally spun out of Yandex, Nebius has established itself as a major AI infrastructure provider with strategic partnerships including a $2 billion investment from NVIDIA and a $27 billion infrastructure deal with Meta covering dedicated GPU capacity and compute resources over a five-year period. The company operates AI-optimized data centers and offers cloud services that span the entire AI stack — from bare-metal GPU access through high-level managed AI services. Nebius competes in the rapidly growing AI cloud market alongside CoreWeave, Lambda, and the major hyperscalers, differentiating through deep engineering expertise across hardware and software layers.
Which company was founded first?
Groq got there first, launching in 2016 — that's 7 years of extra runway. Nebius didn't arrive until 2023. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Groq has about 300 employees; Nebius has about 1,000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Groq and Nebius competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Groq and Nebius compete in AI Infrastructure, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

It's close. Both Groq and Nebius are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.

Who Should You Watch?

This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive