Skip to main content

Harvey AI vs Casetext

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Harvey AI is valued at $8B — more than 3x Casetext's $650M.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Harvey AI leads on 4 of 5 metrics

Harvey AI

4 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
-Experience

Casetext

1 win

-Valuation
-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$8B
$650M
Total Funding
$806M
$64M
Awaira Score
78/100
75/100
Employees
200
120
Founded
2022
2013
Stage
Series F
Acquired
Harvey AICasetext
Winner
Harvey AI logo
Harvey AI

🇺🇸 United States · Winston Weinberg

Series FAI LegalEst. 2022

Valuation

$8B

Total Funding

$806M

Awaira Score78/100

200 employees

Full Harvey AI Profile →
Casetext logo
Casetext

🇺🇸 United States · Jake Heller

AcquiredAI LegalEst. 2013

Valuation

$650M

Total Funding

$64M

Awaira Score75/100

120 employees

Full Casetext Profile →
Market Context

Harvey AI and Casetext are both AI Legal companies based in United States, making this a direct domestic rivalry. The stage gap — Harvey AI at Series F vs Casetext at Acquired — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

The AI Legal sector features both Harvey AI and Casetext as key players. Harvey AI is a legal artificial intelligence company founded in 2022 that provides AI-powered software solutions for law firms and corporate legal departments. Casetext is an AI-powered legal research and document automation platform founded in 2013.

Funding & Valuation

At $8B, Harvey AI's valuation dwarfs Casetext's $650M by a factor of 12.3. Capital raised tells a clear story: Harvey AI at $806M versus Casetext at $64M — a $742M difference.

Growth Stage

Harvey AI is the younger company by 9 years, having launched in 2022 compared to Casetext's 2013 founding. Growth stages differ: Harvey AI (Series F) versus Casetext (Acquired), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. On headcount, Harvey AI reports 200 employees and Casetext reports 120.

Geography & Outlook

Both companies are headquartered in 🇺🇸 United States, competing for the same regional talent pool and customer base. Awaira's composite score rates them neck-and-neck: Harvey AI at 78 and Casetext at 75 out of 100. Harvey AI, led by Winston Weinberg, and Casetext, led by Jake Heller, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

Harvey AI

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$128.3M
Funding Span2.6 yrs

Casetext

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$21.3M
Funding Span4.4 yrs

Funding History

Harvey AI has completed 3 funding rounds, while Casetext has gone through 3. Harvey AI's most recent round was a Series D of $300M, compared to Casetext's Series C ($36M). Harvey AI is at Series F while Casetext is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Harvey AI has about 200 people and Casetext has around 120. Casetext has a 9-year head start, founded in 2013 vs Harvey AI's 2022. Both are based in United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricHarvey AICasetext
💰Valuation
$8BWINS
$650M
📈Total Funding
$806MWINS
$64M
📅Founded
2022WINS
2013
🚀Stage
Series F
Acquired
👥Employees
200
120
🌍Country
United States
United States
🏷️Category
AI Legal
AI Legal
Awaira Score
78WINS
75

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Harvey AI is valued 12.3x higher ($8B vs $650M)

📈

Funding gap: Harvey AI has raised $742M more ($806M vs $64M)

📅

Market experience: Casetext has 9 years more (founded 2013 vs 2022)

🚀

Growth stage: Harvey AI is at Series F vs Casetext at Acquired

👥

Team size: Harvey AI has 200 employees vs Casetext's 120

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Legal market segment

Awaira Score: Harvey AI scores 78/100 vs Casetext's 75/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Harvey AI logo

Choose Harvey AI if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 78/100 vs 75/100
  • More established by valuation ($8B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $806M
  • Harvey AI is a legal artificial intelligence company founded in 2022 that provides AI-powered software solutions for law firms and corporate legal departments
Casetext logo

Choose Casetext if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2013
  • Casetext is an AI-powered legal research and document automation platform founded in 2013

Funding History

Harvey AI raised $806M across 3 rounds. Casetext raised $64M across 3 rounds.

Harvey AI

Series D

Feb 2025

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$300M

Series B

Dec 2023

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$80M

Series A

Jul 2022

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$5M

Casetext

Series C

Jun 2021

Lead: Menlo Ventures

$36M

Series B

Sep 2018

$13M

Series A

Jan 2017

Lead: Greycroft

$15M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Harvey AI

Sequoia CapitalWestcourt CapitalOpenAI Startup Fund

Unique to Casetext

Menlo VenturesGreycroft

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Harvey AI vs Casetext

Is Harvey AI bigger than Casetext?
By valuation, Harvey AI is the larger company at $8B versus $650M — a 12.3x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Harvey AI employs 200 people while Casetext has 120 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Harvey AI or Casetext?
Harvey AI has raised more in total funding at $806M, compared to Casetext's $64M — a gap of $742M. Combined, the two companies have completed 6 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Harvey AI leads with an Awaira Score of 78/100, while Casetext sits at 75/100. That 3-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Harvey AI vs Casetext?
Harvey AI was founded by Winston Weinberg in 2022. Casetext was founded by Jake Heller in 2013. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Harvey AI do vs Casetext?
Harvey AI: Harvey AI is a legal artificial intelligence company founded in 2022 that provides AI-powered software solutions for law firms and corporate legal departments. The company develops large language model-based tools designed to assist legal professionals with document review, legal research, contract analysis, and other knowledge-intensive tasks. Harvey's platform integrates generative AI technology to help lawyers work more efficiently across various practice areas including corporate law, litigation, and regulatory compliance. The company is backed by prominent investors and has achieved a valuation of $1.5 billion as of its Series D funding round, with total funding reaching $206 million. Harvey AI operates in the rapidly expanding legal tech sector, competing alongside other AI-driven legal platforms such as LexisNexis+ AI and other enterprise legal AI solutions. The company has secured notable law firm clients and continues to expand its customer base within the legal services industry. Harvey's approach focuses on developing domain-specific AI models trained on legal data and workflows, rather than generic large language models. The company positions itself as infrastructure for legal professionals rather than a replacement for human judgment. Growth trajectory indicates strong market adoption within the legal sector, driven by increasing demand for AI-assisted legal work and operational efficiency improvements. Harvey AI has secured over $200 million in funding at a $1.5 billion valuation by focusing specifically on legal-domain AI rather than general-purpose language models. Casetext: Casetext is an AI-powered legal research and document automation platform founded in 2013. The company develops software that assists legal professionals with legal research, contract analysis, and document drafting through machine learning and natural language processing technologies. Its flagship product, CoCounsel, is an AI legal assistant that helps attorneys perform legal research, due diligence, and document review more efficiently. The platform integrates generative AI capabilities to analyze case law, statutes, and legal documents, enabling lawyers to reduce time spent on routine tasks and focus on higher-value work. Casetext positions itself in the legal AI market alongside competitors like LexisNexis, Westlaw, and newer entrants focused on AI-assisted legal work. The company has built its technology on proprietary legal databases and machine learning models trained on legal content. Its customer base includes law firms, in-house legal departments, and corporate legal teams seeking to modernize their research and document workflows. Founded with $64M in total funding, Casetext achieved a $700M valuation before being acquired, demonstrating significant growth in the legal technology sector. The acquisition reflects the increasing consolidation in legal AI as larger players and investors recognize the market opportunity. The company represents broader trends toward AI adoption in professional services, particularly in knowledge-intensive industries like law. Casetext pioneered accessible AI-assisted legal research for attorneys by combining generative AI with specialized legal training data.
Which company was founded first?
Casetext got there first, launching in 2013 — that's 9 years of extra runway. Harvey AI didn't arrive until 2022. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Harvey AI has about 200 employees; Casetext has about 120. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Harvey AI and Casetext competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Harvey AI and Casetext compete in AI Legal, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

It's close. Both Harvey AI and Casetext are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.

Who Should You Watch?

This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive