Iguazio vs Improbable
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Improbable leads in funding with $700M, well ahead of Iguazio's $72M.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Iguazio
0 wins
Improbable
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇮🇱 Israel · Yaron Haviv
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$72M
100-500 employees
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Herman Narula
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$700M
500-1000 employees
Both companies compete in the ML Platform space, though from different geographies — Iguazio in Israel and Improbable in United Kingdom. Different stages (Acquired vs Series C) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Iguazio and Improbable are direct competitors in ML Platform. Iguazio built an MLOps and real-time AI platform that provided a unified data and model serving infrastructure for machine learning applications requiring low-latency prediction serving and real-time feature computation, enabling data science teams to deploy models into production with integrated feature stores, model serving, and monitoring pipelines. Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development.
Funding & Valuation
Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation. On the funding front, Improbable has secured $700M, outpacing Iguazio's $72M by $628M.
Growth Stage
Established in 2012, Improbable has a modest 2-year head start over Iguazio (2014). Iguazio is at Acquired while Improbable stands at Series C, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Team sizes also differ: Iguazio employs 100-500 people versus Improbable's 500-1000.
Geography & Outlook
Iguazio operates out of 🇮🇱 Israel while Improbable is based in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. Awaira rates Improbable at 68 and Iguazio at 53, a gap that reflects differences in capital efficiency and market traction. Under Yaron Haviv and Herman Narula respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Iguazio
Improbable
Funding History
Iguazio has completed 5 funding rounds, while Improbable has gone through 2. Iguazio's most recent round was a Series D of $28.8M, compared to Improbable's Series B ($502M). Iguazio is at Acquired while Improbable is at Series C — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Improbable has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 5x the size of Iguazio's 100-500. They're close in age — Iguazio started in 2014 and Improbable in 2012. Geographically, they're in different markets — Iguazio operates out of Israel and Improbable from United Kingdom.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Iguazio | Improbable |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | N/A |
📈Total Funding | $72M | $700MWINS |
📅Founded | 2014WINS | 2012 |
🚀Stage | Acquired | Series C |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | Israel | United Kingdom |
🏷️Category | ML Platform | ML Platform |
⭐Awaira Score | 53 | 68WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Improbable has raised $628M more ($700M vs $72M)
Market experience: Improbable has 2 years more (founded 2012 vs 2014)
Growth stage: Iguazio is at Acquired vs Improbable at Series C
Team size: Iguazio has 100-500 employees vs Improbable's 500-1000
Market base: 🇮🇱 Iguazio (Israel) vs 🇬🇧 Improbable (United Kingdom)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the ML Platform market segment
Awaira Score: Improbable scores 68/100 vs Iguazio's 53/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Iguazio if…
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Iguazio built an MLOps and real-time AI platform that provided a unified data and model serving infrastructure for machine learning applications requiring low-latency prediction serving and real-time feature computation, enabling data science teams to deploy models into production with integrated feature stores, model serving, and monitoring pipelines
Choose Improbable if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 68/100 vs 53/100
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $700M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2012
- ✓United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development
Funding History
Iguazio raised $72M across 5 rounds. Improbable raised $700M across 2 rounds.
Iguazio
Series D
Oct 2019
Series C
Jun 2018
Series B
Feb 2017
Series A
Oct 2015
Seed
Jun 2014
Improbable
Series B
May 2017
Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund
Series A
Mar 2015
Lead: Andreessen Horowitz
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Improbable
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Iguazio vs Improbable
Is Iguazio bigger than Improbable?▾
Which company raised more funding — Iguazio or Improbable?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Iguazio vs Improbable?▾
What does Iguazio do vs Improbable?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Iguazio and Improbable competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Improbable edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 68, but Iguazio (53) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.
Who Should You Watch?
Improbable is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Iguazio has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.