Improbable vs Iguazio
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Improbable has raised $700M — double what Iguazio has pulled in.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Improbable
4 wins
Iguazio
0 wins
Key Numbers
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Herman Narula
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$700M
500-1000 employees
🇮🇱 Israel · Yaron Haviv
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$72M
100-500 employees
Both companies compete in the ML Platform space, though from different geographies — Improbable in United Kingdom and Iguazio in Israel. Different stages (Series C vs Acquired) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
In the ML Platform market, Improbable and Iguazio represent two distinct approaches. Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development. Iguazio built an MLOps and real-time AI platform that provided a unified data and model serving infrastructure for machine learning applications requiring low-latency prediction serving and real-time feature computation, enabling data science teams to deploy models into production with integrated feature stores, model serving, and monitoring pipelines.
Funding & Valuation
Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation. Improbable has amassed $700M in total funding, far exceeding Iguazio's $72M.
Growth Stage
Established in 2012, Improbable has a modest 2-year head start over Iguazio (2014). Stage-wise, Improbable is classified as Series C and Iguazio as Acquired, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. Headcount tells a story too: Improbable has 500-1000 employees and Iguazio has 100-500.
Geography & Outlook
Geography separates them: Improbable in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom and Iguazio in 🇮🇱 Israel, each benefiting from local ecosystems. Improbable holds a moderate edge on Awaira's composite score (68 vs. 53), driven by stronger fundamentals in funding and growth metrics. Under Herman Narula and Yaron Haviv respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Improbable
Iguazio
Funding History
Improbable has completed 2 funding rounds, while Iguazio has gone through 5. Improbable's most recent round was a Series B of $502M, compared to Iguazio's Series D ($28.8M). Improbable is at Series C while Iguazio is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Improbable is significantly larger with about 500-1000 employees, compared to Iguazio's 100-500. That's a 5x difference in headcount. They're close in age — Improbable started in 2012 and Iguazio in 2014. Geographically, they're in different markets — Improbable operates out of United Kingdom and Iguazio from Israel.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Improbable | Iguazio |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | N/A |
📈Total Funding | $700MWINS | $72M |
📅Founded | 2012 | 2014WINS |
🚀Stage | Series C | Acquired |
👥Employees | 500-1000 | 100-500 |
🌍Country | United Kingdom | Israel |
🏷️Category | ML Platform | ML Platform |
⭐Awaira Score | 68WINS | 53 |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Improbable has raised $628M more ($700M vs $72M)
Market experience: Improbable has 2 years more (founded 2012 vs 2014)
Growth stage: Improbable is at Series C vs Iguazio at Acquired
Team size: Improbable has 500-1000 employees vs Iguazio's 100-500
Market base: 🇬🇧 Improbable (United Kingdom) vs 🇮🇱 Iguazio (Israel)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the ML Platform market segment
Awaira Score: Improbable scores 68/100 vs Iguazio's 53/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Improbable if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 68/100 vs 53/100
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $700M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2012
- ✓United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development
Choose Iguazio if…
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Iguazio built an MLOps and real-time AI platform that provided a unified data and model serving infrastructure for machine learning applications requiring low-latency prediction serving and real-time feature computation, enabling data science teams to deploy models into production with integrated feature stores, model serving, and monitoring pipelines
Funding History
Improbable raised $700M across 2 rounds. Iguazio raised $72M across 5 rounds.
Improbable
Series B
May 2017
Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund
Series A
Mar 2015
Lead: Andreessen Horowitz
Iguazio
Series D
Oct 2019
Series C
Jun 2018
Series B
Feb 2017
Series A
Oct 2015
Seed
Jun 2014
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Improbable
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Improbable vs Iguazio
Is Improbable bigger than Iguazio?▾
Which company raised more funding — Improbable or Iguazio?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Improbable vs Iguazio?▾
What does Improbable do vs Iguazio?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Improbable and Iguazio competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Improbable edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 68, but Iguazio (53) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.
Who Should You Watch?
Improbable has the edge right now — higher Awaira Score and more capital to work with. That said, Iguazio could close the gap with the right round or product launch. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.