Skip to main content

Lunit vs Insitro

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Insitro leads in funding with $743M, well ahead of Lunit's $150M.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Insitro leads on 3 of 5 metrics

Lunit

1 win

-Valuation
-Funding
-Awaira Score
=Team Size
+Experience

Insitro

3 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
+Awaira Score
=Team Size
-Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$829M
$2.2B
Total Funding
$150M
$743M
Awaira Score
63/100
73/100
Employees
300
300
Founded
2013
2018
Stage
Public
Series C
LunitInsitro
Lunit logo
Lunit

🇰🇷 South Korea · Brandon Suh

PublicAI HealthcareEst. 2013

Valuation

$829M

Total Funding

$150M

Awaira Score63/100

300 employees

Full Lunit Profile →
Winner
Insitro logo
Insitro

🇺🇸 United States · Daphne Koller

Series CAI HealthcareEst. 2018

Valuation

$2.2B

Total Funding

$743M

Awaira Score73/100

300 employees

Full Insitro Profile →
Market Context

As AI Healthcare players, Lunit and Insitro target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Lunit at Public vs Insitro at Series C — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Lunit and Insitro both operate in AI Healthcare, though their strategies diverge significantly. Lunit is a South Korean AI healthcare company founded in 2013 that specializes in diagnostic imaging analysis using artificial intelligence. Insitro is an AI-driven drug discovery company founded in 2018 that applies machine learning to accelerate pharmaceutical development.

Funding & Valuation

Insitro is valued at $2.2B, putting it 2.7x ahead of Lunit ($829M). With $743M raised, Insitro has attracted substantially more capital than Lunit ($150M).

Growth Stage

With a 5-year head start, Lunit (founded 2013) has had considerably more time to mature than Insitro (2018). Growth stages differ: Lunit (Public) versus Insitro (Series C), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Team sizes also differ: Lunit employs 300 people versus Insitro's 300.

Geography & Outlook

Based in 🇰🇷 South Korea and 🇺🇸 United States respectively, Lunit and Insitro tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. Awaira rates Insitro at 73 and Lunit at 63, a gap that reflects differences in capital efficiency and market traction. Lunit, led by Brandon Suh, and Insitro, led by Daphne Koller, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

Lunit

Total Rounds4
Avg. Round Size$25M
Funding Span6 yrs

Insitro

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$124.3M
Funding Span2.7 yrs

Funding History

Lunit has completed 4 funding rounds, while Insitro has gone through 3. Lunit's most recent round was a IPO, compared to Insitro's Series C ($200M). Lunit is at Public while Insitro is at Series C — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Lunit has about 300 people and Insitro has around 300. Lunit has a 5-year head start, founded in 2013 vs Insitro's 2018. Geographically, they're in different markets — Lunit operates out of South Korea and Insitro from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricLunitInsitro
💰Valuation
$829M
$2.2BWINS
📈Total Funding
$150M
$743MWINS
📅Founded
2013
2018WINS
🚀Stage
Public
Series C
👥Employees
300
300
🌍Country
South Korea
United States
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
63
73WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Insitro is valued 2.7x higher ($2.2B vs $829M)

📈

Funding gap: Insitro has raised $593M more ($743M vs $150M)

📅

Market experience: Lunit has 5 years more (founded 2013 vs 2018)

🚀

Growth stage: Lunit is at Public vs Insitro at Series C

🌍

Market base: 🇰🇷 Lunit (South Korea) vs 🇺🇸 Insitro (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Awaira Score: Insitro scores 73/100 vs Lunit's 63/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Lunit logo

Choose Lunit if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2013
  • South Korea-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Lunit is a South Korean AI healthcare company founded in 2013 that specializes in diagnostic imaging analysis using artificial intelligence
Insitro logo

Choose Insitro if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 73/100 vs 63/100
  • More established by valuation ($2.2B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $743M
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Insitro is an AI-driven drug discovery company founded in 2018 that applies machine learning to accelerate pharmaceutical development

Funding History

Lunit raised $150M across 4 rounds. Insitro raised $743M across 3 rounds.

Lunit

IPO

Jan 2021

Series C

Jan 2019

$40M

Series B

Jan 2017

$25M

Series A

Jan 2015

$10M

Insitro

Series C

Oct 2021

Lead: Andreessen Horowitz

$200M

Series B

Jan 2020

Lead: Andreessen Horowitz

$143M

Series A

Jan 2019

Lead: Andreessen Horowitz

$30M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Insitro

Andreessen HorowitzCasdin PartnersBoehringer IngelheimSalesforce Ventures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Lunit vs Insitro

Is Lunit bigger than Insitro?
By valuation, Insitro is the larger company at $2.2B versus $829M — a 2.7x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Lunit employs 300 people while Insitro has 300 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Lunit or Insitro?
Insitro has raised more in total funding at $743M, compared to Lunit's $150M — a gap of $593M. Combined, the two companies have completed 7 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Insitro leads with an Awaira Score of 73/100, while Lunit sits at 63/100. That 10-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Lunit vs Insitro?
Lunit was founded by Brandon Suh in 2013. Insitro was founded by Daphne Koller in 2018. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Lunit do vs Insitro?
Lunit: Lunit is a South Korean AI healthcare company founded in 2013 that specializes in diagnostic imaging analysis using artificial intelligence. The company develops machine learning algorithms designed to assist radiologists in detecting abnormalities across medical imaging modalities, particularly in chest radiography, breast cancer screening, and CT scans. Lunit's core platform uses deep learning to analyze medical images and provide clinical decision support, aiming to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in healthcare settings. The company's primary products include Lunit INSIGHT, a software solution that integrates with existing hospital infrastructure and picture archiving systems. Lunit has established a presence across Asia, Europe, and other regions, with its technology deployed in hospitals and diagnostic centers. The company went public on the Korean stock exchange, achieving a valuation of $0.8 billion. With $150 million in total funding raised through various rounds before its public listing, Lunit operates in a competitive segment alongside companies like Zebra Medical Vision, Arterys, and various regional competitors. The company faces competition from both specialized AI diagnostic firms and larger healthcare technology providers developing similar capabilities. Lunit's growth trajectory reflects increasing adoption of AI in medical imaging across Asia-Pacific markets, where regulatory pathways and healthcare infrastructure continue to evolve to accommodate such technologies. Lunit is among the few AI medical imaging companies to achieve public market status, particularly from South Korea, reflecting regional strength in healthcare technology advancement. Insitro: Insitro is an AI-driven drug discovery company founded in 2018 that applies machine learning to accelerate pharmaceutical development. The company combines computational biology, artificial intelligence, and wet-lab experimentation to identify and validate drug targets more efficiently than traditional methods. Insitro's platform uses proprietary algorithms to analyze complex biological data, predict drug efficacy and safety profiles, and optimize candidate selection across therapeutic areas including metabolic disease, oncology, and immunology. The company has raised $743 million across multiple funding rounds, achieving a valuation of $2.2 billion as of its Series C stage. This positions Insitro among well-capitalized AI healthcare startups addressing the structural inefficiencies in drug discovery. The company partners with pharmaceutical institutions to apply its technology to their pipelines, utilizing both internal discovery programs and collaborations. Insitro's competitive approach differs from pure software platforms by integrating experimental validation, reducing the translation gap between computational predictions and real-world drug performance. The company operates in a crowded but expanding market of AI drug discovery platforms competing against both established pharma AI initiatives and other venture-backed startups. Its growth trajectory reflects investor confidence in AI-enabled drug discovery models, though clinical validation remains ongoing for internally developed candidates. Insitro uniquely combines machine learning with integrated wet-lab capabilities rather than operating as pure software, bridging computational predictions to experimental validation.
Which company was founded first?
Lunit got there first, launching in 2013 — that's 5 years of extra runway. Insitro didn't arrive until 2018. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Both Lunit and Insitro report about 300 employees. Team size is a rough proxy for scale, but lean AI companies routinely punch above their headcount.
Are Lunit and Insitro competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Lunit and Insitro compete in AI Healthcare, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Insitro edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 73, but Lunit (63) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.

Who Should You Watch?

Insitro has a slight edge on paper, but Lunit isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive