Overall Winner: Wayve·95/ 100
VS
W
WayveWinner

Mobileye vs Wayve

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

M
Mobileye

🇮🇱 Israel · Amnon Shashua

PublicAI RoboticsEst. 1999

Valuation

$15B

Total Funding

N/A

92
Awaira Score92/100

1000+ employees

Full Mobileye Profile →
Winner
W
Wayve

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Amar Shah

Series CAI RoboticsEst. 2017

Valuation

$5B

Total Funding

$1.3B

95
Awaira Score95/100

100-500 employees

Full Wayve Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Mobileye and Wayve compete directly in the AI Robotics space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Mobileye designs AI chips and software systems for advanced driver assistance and autonomous driving, producing the EyeQ system-on-chip series and associated computer vision software stack that is integrated into hundreds of millions of vehicles globally as the technical foundation for features including lane keeping, automatic emergency braking, and adaptive cruise control. Wayve builds embodied AI systems for autonomous driving, developing a data-driven approach that trains neural networks end-to-end from raw sensor inputs to vehicle controls.

Mobileye carries a valuation of $15B, which is 3x higher than Wayve's $5B. Wayve has raised $1.3B in disclosed funding.

Mobileye has 18 years more market experience, having been founded in 1999 compared to Wayve's 2017 founding. In terms of growth stage, Mobileye is at Public while Wayve is at Series C — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Mobileye operates out of 🇮🇱 Israel while Wayve is based in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, both companies are closely matched — Mobileye scores 92 and Wayve scores 95.

Metrics Comparison

MetricMobileyeWayve
💰Valuation
$15BWINS
$5B
📈Total Funding
N/A
$1.3B
📅Founded
1999
2017WINS
🚀Stage
Public
Series C
👥Employees
1000+
100-500
🌍Country
Israel
United Kingdom
🏷️Category
AI Robotics
AI Robotics
Awaira Score
92
95WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Mobileye is valued 3x higher ($15B vs $5B)

📅

Market experience: Mobileye has 18 years more (founded 1999 vs 2017)

🚀

Growth stage: Mobileye is at Public vs Wayve at Series C

👥

Team size: Mobileye has 1000+ employees vs Wayve's 100-500

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇱 Mobileye (Israel) vs 🇬🇧 Wayve (United Kingdom)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Robotics market segment

Awaira Score: Wayve scores 95/100 vs Mobileye's 92/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

M

Choose Mobileye if…

  • More established by valuation ($15B)
  • More market experience — founded in 1999
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Mobileye designs AI chips and software systems for advanced driver assistance and autonomous driving, producing the EyeQ system-on-chip series and associated computer vision software stack that is integrated into hundreds of millions of vehicles globally as the technical foundation for features including lane keeping, automatic emergency braking, and adaptive cruise control
W

Choose Wayve if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 95/100 vs 92/100
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $1.3B
  • United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Wayve builds embodied AI systems for autonomous driving, developing a data-driven approach that trains neural networks end-to-end from raw sensor inputs to vehicle controls

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Mobileye vs Wayve

Is Mobileye bigger than Wayve?
By valuation, Mobileye is the larger company at $15B versus $5B — a 3x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Mobileye employs 1000+ people while Wayve has 100-500 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Mobileye or Wayve?
Wayve has raised $1.3B in disclosed funding across 0 known rounds. Mobileye's funding history is not publicly available.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Wayve holds the higher Awaira Score at 95/100, compared to Mobileye's 92/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 3-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Mobileye vs Wayve?
Mobileye was founded by Amnon Shashua in 1999. Wayve was founded by Amar Shah in 2017. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Mobileye do vs Wayve?
Mobileye: Mobileye designs AI chips and software systems for advanced driver assistance and autonomous driving, producing the EyeQ system-on-chip series and associated computer vision software stack that is integrated into hundreds of millions of vehicles globally as the technical foundation for features including lane keeping, automatic emergency braking, and adaptive cruise control. The Jerusalem company was founded as a camera-based ADAS system pioneer before the autonomous vehicle era and grew to dominate the mass-market vehicle safety chip segment.\n\nMobileye was acquired by Intel in 2017 for approximately $15 billion and subsequently relisted on NASDAQ in 2022 in one of the largest technology IPOs of that year, with Intel retaining a majority stake. The company reports its EyeQ chips are integrated into vehicles from over 50 automakers globally, representing a dominant market share in camera-based ADAS hardware. Mobileye has expanded its product roadmap beyond ADAS toward full autonomy products including its Robotaxi platform, tested in Munich, Detroit, and Tel Aviv with selected mobility partners.\n\nMobileye competes in the ADAS and autonomous driving chip market against NVIDIA Drive, Qualcomm Snapdragon Ride, and Texas Instruments for automotive processor design wins, as well as against Waymo, Cruise, and Zoox in autonomous vehicle deployment. Its vertical integration across chip design, computer vision software, and mapping data creates a complete ADAS stack that automakers can implement without integrating components from multiple vendors. The Israel engineering heritage in computer vision, combined with decades of automaker relationships, gives Mobileye structural advantages in a market where safety certification requirements create multi-year adoption timelines. Wayve: Wayve builds embodied AI systems for autonomous driving, developing a data-driven approach that trains neural networks end-to-end from raw sensor inputs to vehicle controls. Founded in Cambridge and headquartered in London, the company focuses on a generalist AI model that can adapt to new environments without hand-coded rules, distinguishing it from traditional autonomous vehicle stacks.\n\nThe company raised a $1 billion Series C round in 2024 led by SoftBank, with participation from Microsoft and NVIDIA, bringing total funding to approximately $1.3 billion. Wayve has deployed test vehicles across London and conducts large-scale data collection partnerships with commercial fleet operators including Asda and Ocado.\n\nWayve competes in a global autonomous vehicle market projected to exceed $500 billion by 2030, positioning itself against Waymo, Cruise, and Mobileye with a fundamentally different AI-first architecture. The company holds a valuation of approximately $5 billion and is considered one of the most significant autonomous vehicle startups outside the United States, with backing from some of the largest technology investors globally.
Which company was founded first?
Mobileye was founded first in 1999, giving it 18 years of additional market experience. Wayve was founded later in 2017. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Mobileye has approximately 1000+ employees, while Wayve has approximately 100-500. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Mobileye and Wayve competitors?
Yes, Mobileye and Wayve are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Robotics space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.