Skip to main content

Nearthlab vs Tractable

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Tractable is valued at $1B — more than 3x Nearthlab's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Tractable leads on 4 of 4 metrics

Nearthlab

0 wins

-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Tractable

4 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$1B
Total Funding
$15M
$185M
Awaira Score
40/100
80/100
Employees
1-50
100-500
Founded
2015
2014
Stage
Series B
Series E
NearthlabTractable
Nearthlab logo
Nearthlab

🇰🇷 South Korea · Thomas Kim

Series BComputer VisionEst. 2015

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$15M

Awaira Score40/100

1-50 employees

Full Nearthlab Profile →
Winner
Tractable logo
Tractable

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Alexandre Dalyac

Series EComputer VisionEst. 2014

Valuation

$1B

Total Funding

$185M

Awaira Score80/100

100-500 employees

Full Tractable Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the Computer Vision space, though from different geographies — Nearthlab in South Korea and Tractable in United Kingdom. Different stages (Series B vs Series E) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Within Computer Vision, Nearthlab and Tractable rank among the most closely watched rivals. Nearthlab develops AI-powered drone inspection software for wind turbines and critical infrastructure, using computer vision models to automatically detect and classify structural defects from aerial images captured by inspection drones, replacing manual rope access inspection with automated drone-and-AI workflows that are safer, faster, and more consistent. Tractable builds AI systems for visual damage assessment in insurance and automotive claims processing, using deep learning models trained on millions of historical repair estimates and vehicle inspection images.

Funding & Valuation

Only Tractable has a public valuation on record ($1B); Nearthlab's has not been disclosed. Tractable has amassed $185M in total funding, far exceeding Nearthlab's $15M.

Growth Stage

Established in 2014, Tractable has a modest 1-year head start over Nearthlab (2015). Nearthlab is at Series B while Tractable stands at Series E, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Headcount tells a story too: Nearthlab has 1-50 employees and Tractable has 100-500.

Geography & Outlook

Geography separates them: Nearthlab in 🇰🇷 South Korea and Tractable in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom, each benefiting from local ecosystems. A 40-point gap on the Awaira Score (Tractable: 80, Nearthlab: 40) signals a clear difference in overall company strength. Under Thomas Kim and Alexandre Dalyac respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Nearthlab

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$5M
Funding Span2.7 yrs

Tractable

Total Rounds2
Avg. Round Size$45M
Funding Span2.4 yrs

Funding History

Nearthlab has completed 3 funding rounds, while Tractable has gone through 2. Nearthlab's most recent round was a Series B of $10.5M, compared to Tractable's Series D ($65M). Nearthlab is at Series B while Tractable is at Series E — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Tractable has the bigger team at roughly 100-500 people — 100x the size of Nearthlab's 1-50. They're close in age — Nearthlab started in 2015 and Tractable in 2014. Geographically, they're in different markets — Nearthlab operates out of South Korea and Tractable from United Kingdom.

Metrics Comparison

MetricNearthlabTractable
💰Valuation
N/A
$1B
📈Total Funding
$15M
$185MWINS
📅Founded
2015WINS
2014
🚀Stage
Series B
Series E
👥Employees
1-50
100-500
🌍Country
South Korea
United Kingdom
🏷️Category
Computer Vision
Computer Vision
Awaira Score
40
80WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Tractable has raised $170M more ($185M vs $15M)

📅

Market experience: Tractable has 1 year more (founded 2014 vs 2015)

🚀

Growth stage: Nearthlab is at Series B vs Tractable at Series E

👥

Team size: Nearthlab has 1-50 employees vs Tractable's 100-500

🌍

Market base: 🇰🇷 Nearthlab (South Korea) vs 🇬🇧 Tractable (United Kingdom)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the Computer Vision market segment

Awaira Score: Tractable scores 80/100 vs Nearthlab's 40/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Nearthlab logo

Choose Nearthlab if…

  • South Korea-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Nearthlab develops AI-powered drone inspection software for wind turbines and critical infrastructure, using computer vision models to automatically detect and classify structural defects from aerial images captured by inspection drones, replacing manual rope access inspection with automated drone-and-AI workflows that are safer, faster, and more consistent
Tractable logo

Choose Tractable if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 40/100
  • More established by valuation ($1B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $185M
  • More market experience — founded in 2014
  • United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Tractable builds AI systems for visual damage assessment in insurance and automotive claims processing, using deep learning models trained on millions of historical repair estimates and vehicle inspection images

Funding History

Nearthlab raised $15M across 3 rounds. Tractable raised $185M across 2 rounds.

Nearthlab

Series B

Feb 2018

$10.5M

Series A

Oct 2016

$3.3M

Seed

Jun 2015

$1.2M

Tractable

Series D

Jun 2022

Lead: Insight Partners

$65M

Series C

Feb 2020

Lead: Insight Partners

$25M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Tractable

Insight PartnersGeorgian

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Nearthlab vs Tractable

Is Nearthlab bigger than Tractable?
Tractable has a disclosed valuation of $1B, while Nearthlab's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Tractable employs 100-500 people.
Which company raised more funding — Nearthlab or Tractable?
Tractable has raised more in total funding at $185M, compared to Nearthlab's $15M — a gap of $170M. Combined, the two companies have completed 5 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Tractable leads with an Awaira Score of 80/100, while Nearthlab sits at 40/100. That 40-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Nearthlab vs Tractable?
Nearthlab was founded by Thomas Kim in 2015. Tractable was founded by Alexandre Dalyac in 2014. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Nearthlab do vs Tractable?
Nearthlab: Nearthlab develops AI-powered drone inspection software for wind turbines and critical infrastructure, using computer vision models to automatically detect and classify structural defects from aerial images captured by inspection drones, replacing manual rope access inspection with automated drone-and-AI workflows that are safer, faster, and more consistent. The Seoul company platform processes blade inspection imagery to identify cracks, erosion, and lightning strike damage across the turbine blade surface.\n\nThe company raised approximately $15 million in venture funding and has deployed its inspection platform across wind farms in South Korea, Europe, and North America. Nearthlab has built partnerships with drone hardware manufacturers and wind energy operators, positioning the platform within existing operational maintenance workflows. The company reports that its AI defect detection achieves accuracy comparable to expert human inspectors on standardised blade damage classification tasks.\n\nNearthlab competes in the AI infrastructure inspection market against Cyberhawk, Apellix, and DroneBase, as well as in-house drone inspection programs at major wind turbine manufacturers including Vestas and Siemens Gamesa. The wind energy sector represents a growing market for automated inspection as global installed wind capacity expands and blade maintenance costs become a significant component of wind farm operating expenditure. AI-powered defect detection that can prioritise maintenance work orders based on damage severity provides direct cost reduction for wind farm operators managing large fleets of turbines across geographically distributed sites. Tractable: Tractable builds AI systems for visual damage assessment in insurance and automotive claims processing, using deep learning models trained on millions of historical repair estimates and vehicle inspection images. The platform automates appraisals for vehicle collisions, property damage, and disaster recovery, enabling insurers and repairers to process claims in minutes rather than days.\n\nThe company has raised approximately $115 million across five funding rounds and reached unicorn status with a valuation of $1 billion following its Series E. Tractable counts major global insurers and automotive groups among its clients, including Tokio Marine, Covea, and Admiral, with the platform processing claims across North America, Europe, and Japan.\n\nTractable operates in the AI-powered claims automation market, where the total addressable opportunity spans trillions of dollars in annual insurance premiums. The company faces competition from incumbent claims management software vendors and newer AI entrants but maintains a significant advantage through its proprietary training dataset built over a decade of insurance-specific deployment. The platform is estimated to handle billions of dollars in automotive damage assessments annually. Tractable operates in the Computer Vision sector and is headquartered in United Kingdom. Founded in 2014 by Alexandre Dalyac, Tractable has raised $185M in total funding, achieving a valuation of $1B as of its latest round. The company's funding journey includes a Series C of $25M in 2020, a Series D of $65M in 2022. The most recent round was led by Insight Partners. With approximately 100-500 employees, Tractable has established itself as a Series E-stage player in the Computer Vision market. The company holds an Awaira Score of 80/100, reflecting its strong position across valuation, funding trajectory, team scale, and market influence. Tractable competes in a rapidly evolving segment alongside other Computer Vision companies. Based in United Kingdom, Tractable is part of a growing international AI ecosystem attracting talent and investment. The Computer Vision space has attracted significant investment in recent years, with companies racing to capture enterprise and consumer demand for AI-powered solutions.
Which company was founded first?
Tractable got there first, launching in 2014 — that's 1 year of extra runway. Nearthlab didn't arrive until 2015. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Nearthlab has about 1-50 employees; Tractable has about 100-500. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Nearthlab and Tractable competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Nearthlab and Tractable compete in Computer Vision, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Tractable has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 80 vs Nearthlab's 40. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.

Who Should You Watch?

Tractable is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Nearthlab has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive