Nota AI vs Improbable
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Improbable leads in funding with $700M, well ahead of Nota AI's $10M.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Nota AI
0 wins
Improbable
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇰🇷 South Korea · Gwang-jin Cho
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$10M
1-50 employees
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Herman Narula
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$700M
500-1000 employees
Both companies compete in the ML Platform space, though from different geographies — Nota AI in South Korea and Improbable in United Kingdom. Different stages (Series A vs Series C) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
In the ML Platform market, Nota AI and Improbable represent two distinct approaches. Nota AI develops neural network compression and optimisation technology for deploying AI models on edge devices and embedded systems with limited compute and power resources, providing tools that compress, quantise, and prune large neural network models into lightweight versions suitable for smartphones, surveillance cameras, automotive chips, and IoT devices. Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development.
Funding & Valuation
Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation. On the funding front, Improbable has secured $700M, outpacing Nota AI's $10M by $690M.
Growth Stage
With a 7-year head start, Improbable (founded 2012) has had considerably more time to mature than Nota AI (2019). Stage-wise, Nota AI is classified as Series A and Improbable as Series C, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. Headcount tells a story too: Nota AI has 1-50 employees and Improbable has 500-1000.
Geography & Outlook
Geography separates them: Nota AI in 🇰🇷 South Korea and Improbable in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom, each benefiting from local ecosystems. Improbable scores 68 on Awaira's composite index versus Nota AI's 38, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. Under Gwang-jin Cho and Herman Narula respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Nota AI
Improbable
Funding History
Nota AI has completed 2 funding rounds, while Improbable has gone through 2. Nota AI's most recent round was a Series A of $8.3M, compared to Improbable's Series B ($502M). Nota AI is at Series A while Improbable is at Series C — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Improbable has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 500x the size of Nota AI's 1-50. Improbable has a 7-year head start, founded in 2012 vs Nota AI's 2019. Geographically, they're in different markets — Nota AI operates out of South Korea and Improbable from United Kingdom.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Nota AI | Improbable |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | N/A |
📈Total Funding | $10M | $700MWINS |
📅Founded | 2019WINS | 2012 |
🚀Stage | Series A | Series C |
👥Employees | 1-50 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | South Korea | United Kingdom |
🏷️Category | ML Platform | ML Platform |
⭐Awaira Score | 38 | 68WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Improbable has raised $690M more ($700M vs $10M)
Market experience: Improbable has 7 years more (founded 2012 vs 2019)
Growth stage: Nota AI is at Series A vs Improbable at Series C
Team size: Nota AI has 1-50 employees vs Improbable's 500-1000
Market base: 🇰🇷 Nota AI (South Korea) vs 🇬🇧 Improbable (United Kingdom)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the ML Platform market segment
Awaira Score: Improbable scores 68/100 vs Nota AI's 38/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Nota AI if…
- ✓South Korea-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Nota AI develops neural network compression and optimisation technology for deploying AI models on edge devices and embedded systems with limited compute and power resources, providing tools that compress, quantise, and prune large neural network models into lightweight versions suitable for smartphones, surveillance cameras, automotive chips, and IoT devices
Choose Improbable if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 68/100 vs 38/100
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $700M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2012
- ✓United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development
Funding History
Nota AI raised $10M across 2 rounds. Improbable raised $700M across 2 rounds.
Nota AI
Series A
Oct 2020
Seed
Jun 2019
Improbable
Series B
May 2017
Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund
Series A
Mar 2015
Lead: Andreessen Horowitz
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Improbable
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Nota AI vs Improbable
Is Nota AI bigger than Improbable?▾
Which company raised more funding — Nota AI or Improbable?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Nota AI vs Improbable?▾
What does Nota AI do vs Improbable?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Nota AI and Improbable competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Improbable has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 68 vs Nota AI's 38. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Improbable is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Nota AI has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.