Skip to main content

Nota AI vs Improbable

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Improbable leads in funding with $700M, well ahead of Nota AI's $10M.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Improbable leads on 4 of 4 metrics

Nota AI

0 wins

-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Improbable

4 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
N/A
Total Funding
$10M
$700M
Awaira Score
38/100
68/100
Employees
1-50
500-1000
Founded
2019
2012
Stage
Series A
Series C
Nota AIImprobable
Nota AI logo
Nota AI

🇰🇷 South Korea · Gwang-jin Cho

Series AML PlatformEst. 2019

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$10M

Awaira Score38/100

1-50 employees

Full Nota AI Profile →
Winner
Improbable logo
Improbable

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Herman Narula

Series CML PlatformEst. 2012

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$700M

Awaira Score68/100

500-1000 employees

Full Improbable Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the ML Platform space, though from different geographies — Nota AI in South Korea and Improbable in United Kingdom. Different stages (Series A vs Series C) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

In the ML Platform market, Nota AI and Improbable represent two distinct approaches. Nota AI develops neural network compression and optimisation technology for deploying AI models on edge devices and embedded systems with limited compute and power resources, providing tools that compress, quantise, and prune large neural network models into lightweight versions suitable for smartphones, surveillance cameras, automotive chips, and IoT devices. Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development.

Funding & Valuation

Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation. On the funding front, Improbable has secured $700M, outpacing Nota AI's $10M by $690M.

Growth Stage

With a 7-year head start, Improbable (founded 2012) has had considerably more time to mature than Nota AI (2019). Stage-wise, Nota AI is classified as Series A and Improbable as Series C, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. Headcount tells a story too: Nota AI has 1-50 employees and Improbable has 500-1000.

Geography & Outlook

Geography separates them: Nota AI in 🇰🇷 South Korea and Improbable in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom, each benefiting from local ecosystems. Improbable scores 68 on Awaira's composite index versus Nota AI's 38, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. Under Gwang-jin Cho and Herman Narula respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Nota AI

Total Rounds2
Avg. Round Size$5M
Funding Span1.3 yrs

Improbable

Total Rounds2
Avg. Round Size$261M
Funding Span2.1 yrs

Funding History

Nota AI has completed 2 funding rounds, while Improbable has gone through 2. Nota AI's most recent round was a Series A of $8.3M, compared to Improbable's Series B ($502M). Nota AI is at Series A while Improbable is at Series C — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Improbable has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 500x the size of Nota AI's 1-50. Improbable has a 7-year head start, founded in 2012 vs Nota AI's 2019. Geographically, they're in different markets — Nota AI operates out of South Korea and Improbable from United Kingdom.

Metrics Comparison

MetricNota AIImprobable
💰Valuation
N/A
N/A
📈Total Funding
$10M
$700MWINS
📅Founded
2019WINS
2012
🚀Stage
Series A
Series C
👥Employees
1-50
500-1000
🌍Country
South Korea
United Kingdom
🏷️Category
ML Platform
ML Platform
Awaira Score
38
68WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Improbable has raised $690M more ($700M vs $10M)

📅

Market experience: Improbable has 7 years more (founded 2012 vs 2019)

🚀

Growth stage: Nota AI is at Series A vs Improbable at Series C

👥

Team size: Nota AI has 1-50 employees vs Improbable's 500-1000

🌍

Market base: 🇰🇷 Nota AI (South Korea) vs 🇬🇧 Improbable (United Kingdom)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the ML Platform market segment

Awaira Score: Improbable scores 68/100 vs Nota AI's 38/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Nota AI logo

Choose Nota AI if…

  • South Korea-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Nota AI develops neural network compression and optimisation technology for deploying AI models on edge devices and embedded systems with limited compute and power resources, providing tools that compress, quantise, and prune large neural network models into lightweight versions suitable for smartphones, surveillance cameras, automotive chips, and IoT devices
Improbable logo

Choose Improbable if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 68/100 vs 38/100
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $700M
  • More market experience — founded in 2012
  • United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development

Funding History

Nota AI raised $10M across 2 rounds. Improbable raised $700M across 2 rounds.

Nota AI

Series A

Oct 2020

$8.3M

Seed

Jun 2019

$1.7M

Improbable

Series B

May 2017

Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund

$502M

Series A

Mar 2015

Lead: Andreessen Horowitz

$20M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Improbable

SoftBank Vision FundAndreessen Horowitz

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Nota AI vs Improbable

Is Nota AI bigger than Improbable?
Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation, making a definitive size comparison difficult. Nota AI employs 1-50 people, while Improbable has 500-1000 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Nota AI or Improbable?
Improbable has raised more in total funding at $700M, compared to Nota AI's $10M — a gap of $690M. Combined, the two companies have completed 4 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Improbable leads with an Awaira Score of 68/100, while Nota AI sits at 38/100. That 30-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Nota AI vs Improbable?
Nota AI was founded by Gwang-jin Cho in 2019. Improbable was founded by Herman Narula in 2012. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Nota AI do vs Improbable?
Nota AI: Nota AI develops neural network compression and optimisation technology for deploying AI models on edge devices and embedded systems with limited compute and power resources, providing tools that compress, quantise, and prune large neural network models into lightweight versions suitable for smartphones, surveillance cameras, automotive chips, and IoT devices. The Seoul company NetsPresso platform automates the model optimisation workflow, reducing the engineering effort required to adapt research models for production hardware deployment.\n\nThe company raised approximately $10 million in venture funding from Korean AI-focused investors. Nota AI targets computer vision and NLP model deployment scenarios where inference must run locally on resource-constrained hardware rather than in the cloud, a requirement driven by latency, privacy, and connectivity considerations. The company customers include semiconductor companies integrating AI features into SoC designs and device manufacturers seeking to add on-device AI capabilities without redesigning around more powerful processors.\n\nNota AI competes in the edge AI model optimisation market against Kneron, Hailo, and embedded AI optimisation tools from semiconductor companies including ARM, Qualcomm, and MediaTek. Its software-first approach, which optimises models for deployment across diverse existing hardware rather than requiring a specific custom chip, addresses the fragmented edge hardware ecosystem where AI model developers need to support many different target processors from different vendors. The Korean semiconductor industry concentration creates a proximate customer base among chipmakers and device manufacturers seeking edge AI capabilities. Improbable: Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development. The London company built SpatialOS, a cloud platform for running distributed simulations of large, persistent virtual worlds, and has applied simulation capabilities to defence, urban planning, and entertainment applications.\n\nThe company raised approximately $700 million including a landmark $502 million SoftBank round in 2017 that was one of the largest venture rounds in European technology history. Improbable has undergone multiple strategic pivots, moving from gaming infrastructure to defence simulation contracts with clients including the UK Ministry of Defence, which uses simulation environments for training and wargaming. The company also built MSquared, a metaverse interoperability network, before refocusing on defence and AI simulation work.\n\nImprobable operates in an AI simulation market where demand from defence agencies, autonomous vehicle companies, and robotics firms has grown substantially. The company competes with simulation platforms from Epic Games (Unreal Engine), NVIDIA (Omniverse), and specialist defence simulation vendors. Its SoftBank backing and large cash reserves have enabled it to survive multiple market pivot cycles that would have ended less well-funded companies, and its current focus on AI-powered synthetic data generation for defence represents a growing government budget category.
Which company was founded first?
Improbable got there first, launching in 2012 — that's 7 years of extra runway. Nota AI didn't arrive until 2019. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Nota AI has about 1-50 employees; Improbable has about 500-1000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Nota AI and Improbable competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Nota AI and Improbable compete in ML Platform, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Improbable has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 68 vs Nota AI's 38. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.

Who Should You Watch?

Improbable is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Nota AI has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive